The American Way.

cawacko said:
Translation: I don't like the facts so I'm going to make something up to try and discredit them because they go against my ideology and what I stand for. My ideology is more important than being honest.
Click to expand...

You posted an Op-Ed that doesn't provide any context for the numbers you're also using to make your hair-on-fire argument.

You can't speak to this pension crisis at all because you're not even clear on what the actual crisis is, or if there's even a crisis at all.

You don't ask any questions of your argument, nor do you do the research necessary to know the points you're making.

You're a turd.
 
Quote Originally Posted by LV426 View Post
I don't think you can co-operate with Russia, but I think you can with our traditional European allies. I do think we need to be more confrontational to Russian cyber aggression, and the sanctions were a key part of that. But Trump...you know...not enforcing sanctions and having the GOP defend Russia...

For me, any candidate that brags about their "moderate" bonafides is a non-starter candidate for me. I don't want moderates because the Overton window has been pushed so far to the right that "moderate" is just code for "Republican circa 1992"; pre-Gingrich, but still sucky.
Click to expand...

no problem then, only allow lib'ruls in your coalition.......
 
Truth Detector said:
What is with all the lying from the left these days?

In Most States, the Middle Class Is Now Growing — But Slowly.
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/resear...es-the-middle-class-is-now-growing-but-slowly

U.S. middle-class incomes reached highest-ever level in 2016, Census Bureau says
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ec2d7f5d82a7

The Growth of the World’s Middle Class May Be the Greatest Story of Our Age
https://fee.org/articles/the-growth...e-class-may-be-the-greatest-story-of-our-age/
Click to expand...

the death of the middle class is essential for the rise of the lib'rul party......
 
cawacko said:
I don't like the facts so I'm going to make something up to try and discredit them because they go against my ideology and what I stand for. My ideology is more important than being honest.
Click to expand...

That's you, bruh.

You posted an Op-Ed, that provides no context, to advance this false issue of a pension crisis. Then when asked to provide that context, you scream and whine and appeal to authority all while not providing the context!

Wouldn't a $1T liability be a lot less terrifying if it was over 50 years instead of 5?

Wouldn't the liability be determined by the baseline revenues?

So what are the baseline revenues you and/or your Op-Ed are using to determine there's a liability?

Is the baseline 2010, when the economy was in the midst of the Great Recession caused by the Conservative policies you support?

Is the baseline 2018, when the economy was booming as a result of the recovery Obama managed and handled?

These are very basic questions that will reveal the true context of this issue...but you refuse to do that because there's a chance that the context will reveal you are exaggerating a problem for political and ideological reasons.
 
LV426 said:
That's you, bruh.

You posted an Op-Ed, that provides no context, to advance this false issue of a pension crisis. Then when asked to provide that context, you scream and whine and appeal to authority all while not providing the context!

Wouldn't a $1T liability be a lot less terrifying if it was over 50 years instead of 5?

Wouldn't the liability be determined by the baseline revenues?

So what are the baseline revenues you and/or your Op-Ed are using to determine there's a liability?

Is the baseline 2010, when the economy was in the midst of the Great Recession caused by the Conservative policies you support?

Is the baseline 2018, when the economy was booming as a result of the recovery Obama managed and handled?

These are very basic questions that will reveal the true context of this issue...but you refuse to do that because there's a chance that the context will reveal you are exaggerating a problem for political and ideological reasons.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
cawacko said:
Nope. Look at you trying to bully again. The math speaks for itself. You choose not to understand it. That's your issue.
Click to expand...

You're the bully, pal.

You're bullying people with your de-contextualized screeching about a pension crisis, of which you know literally no details.

Wouldn't the liability be affected by revenues? Meaning, wouldn't the liability be reduced as revenues increase? So if you're using baseline revenues from when the economy was depressed, then that makes the liability look bigger than if you used baseline revenues from when the economy was booming, RIGHT?
 
cawacko said:
The math speaks for itself.
Click to expand...

WHAT MATH?

Show me.

To show THE MATH, you'd have to provide the context of the things I'm asking; the baseline revenues and the time frame.

But you've refused to do that.

So THE MATH doesn't speak for itself because you refuse to even do that math. The reason is because doing the math would reveal the context, and the context will ultimately diminish the severity of what you're claiming.

So, show me the math. Show your fucking work.

(Pension Expenditures - Baseline Revenues) x # of years = liability

There's your equation...have at it. But be sure to cite your source so we know what baseline revenues you're using.
 
Last edited:
LV426 said:
WHAT MATH?

Show me.

To show THE MATH, you'd have to provide the context of the things I'm asking; the baseline revenues and the time frame.

But you've refused to do that.

So THE MATH doesn't speak for itself because you refuse to even do that math. The reason is because doing the math would reveal the context, and the context will ultimately diminish the severity of what you're claiming.

So, show me the math. Show your fucking work.

(Pension Expenditures - Baseline Revenues) x # of years = liability

There's your equation...have at it. But be sure to cite your source so we know what baseline revenues you're using.
Click to expand...

He can't do the math because Rush hasn't posted it on his website yet. Give him time.
 
LV426 said:
They're democratic socialists. Which is what we are calling for here. We're not calling for Venezuela, we're calling for Canada. But you leap to Venezuela so you don't have to speak to Canada, and you do that because you're a coward.
Click to expand...

If true, then you are calling for progressivism; not for socialism. Cowards are the people who make-up words, like democratic socialism.
 
Threedee said:
If true, then you are calling for progressivism; not for socialism. Cowards are the people who make-up words, like democratic socialism.
Click to expand...

They're not making up Democratic Socialism, they just don't understand what it is and usually confuse it with Social Democracy.
 
Threedee said:
If true, then you are calling for progressivism; not for socialism. Cowards are the people who make-up words, like democratic socialism.
Click to expand...
You’re silly, it’s not a made up word. It’s why we have public school, highways and Medicare.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top