The American Way.

Boris The Animal said:
The DP is reserved for murderous thugs. Just like the totalitarian Leftists throughout history you support.
Click to expand...

Says who?

The death penalty should be applied to the Wall Street bankers because the damage they did was far worse and affected far more people than the worst serial killer.

BTW - I *LOVE* watching Conservatives defend Wall Street bankers.
 
Frank Apisa said:
FUCK EQUALITY.

If that is what you are efforting toward...even I will oppose you.

Some will always have more than others...and some will always have MUCH MORE than others. In fact, I will go further...it is truly just and appropriate that some have more...even MUCH MORE than others...depending upon contribution to society.

No one should give a rat's ass about that...

...SO LONG AS EVERYONE HAS SUFFICIENT FOR A DECENT LIFE.

If EVERYONE has sufficient food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, educational opportunities, transportation, ability to communicate, and leisure of sorts...IT SHOULD NOT MATTER THAT OTHERS HAVE fancier clothing, fancier houses, bigger cars or leisure opportunities not available to everyone.

(And by "decent"...I mean "abundant.")
Click to expand...

Problem is, Liberals want everyone to be EXACTLY identical in every freaking way.
 
TTQ64 said:
It's why they hung Blacks in the open so other Blacks could see what would happen to them when they disobey.

Crime and punishment is for Blacks only....it's the American Way!
Click to expand...

Exactly.

Racist white Conservatives lynched black people for hundreds of years...so we should return the favor on their Wall Street lords.
 
LV426 said:
Says who?

The death penalty should be applied to the Wall Street bankers because the damage they did was far worse and affected far more people than the worst serial killer.

BTW - I *LOVE* watching Conservatives defend Wall Street bankers.
Click to expand...

It is NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS how much money people make.
 
Boris The Animal said:
So you support one party leftist rule, amirite?
Click to expand...

I think we should exclude Conservatism in every shape and form from our political system, yes. The reason is because Conservatives have accomplished nothing and will accomplish nothing with power. They seek to destroy our institutions instead.

Conservatism is terrorism. Everything about the belief system is terrorist in nature. There is no good among Conservatives. Being a Conservative means you have to be a bad person and act exclusively in bad faith. We don't need that in our political system because it contributes nothing.
 
LV426 said:
I think we should exclude Conservatism in every shape and form from our political system, yes. The reason is because Conservatives have accomplished nothing and will accomplish nothing with power. They seek to destroy our institutions instead.

Conservatism is terrorism. Everything about the belief system is terrorist in nature. There is no good among Conservatives. Being a Conservative means you have to be a bad person and act exclusively in bad faith. We don't need that in our political system because it contributes nothing.
Click to expand...

Well guess the fuck what? What you think does not matter! Truth is we NEED Conservatives to keep you Communists on a chokingly tight leash!
 
Boris The Animal said:
It is NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS how much money people make.
Click to expand...

It's not about making money, it's about HOW they made their fortunes. They did so by actively and knowingly committing fraud. And they did it because you let them get away with it because of your Conservative approach to the economy.

So you screech about globalism but then defend the primary purveyors of that globalism you want people to think you hate so much.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Only a fucking moron would come away with a thought like that after reading what I wrote.

Oh, wait...that is the thought you came away with.

I see!
Click to expand...

You think people will revolt against liberty, because it allows for wealth inequality. The funny thing is that we have previously lived under systems, like aristocracy, which mandated wealth inequality.
 
Threedee said:
Venezuela.
Click to expand...

It's always Venezuela but never Canada, or Germany, or Sweden, or Norway, or South Korea, or Israel, or Denmark, or Swizterland, or the UK, or Portugal, or Japan, or Australia.

No, you use "Venezuela" because you think everyone else is as stupid as you.
 
LV426 said:
It's not about making money, it's about HOW they made their fortunes. They did so by actively and knowingly committing fraud. And they did it because you let them get away with it because of your Conservative approach to the economy.

So you screech about globalism but then defend the primary purveyors of that globalism you want people to think you hate so much.
Click to expand...

Still better than your Communist approach, Bolshevik scumbag. Here's hoping that when Communism takes hold in the US, you suffer the same fate as the Romanoffs did.
 
Threedee said:
You think people will revolt against liberty, because it allows for wealth inequality. The funny thing is that we have previously lived under systems, like aristocracy, which mandated wealth inequality.
Click to expand...

IF you think the people who revolted in France in the laste18th century and in Russia during the early 20th century were REVOLTING AGAINST LIBERTY...

...you are not only stupid, you are probably insane.

Get a grip. You are not forced to be a sheep.
 
LV426 said:
It's always Venezuela but never Canada, or Germany, or Sweden, or Norway, or South Korea, or Israel, or Denmark, or Swizterland, or the UK, or Portugal, or Japan, or Australia.

No, you use "Venezuela" because you think everyone else is as stupid as you.
Click to expand...

Those countries aren't socialist. They are progressive, meaning they are leaning away from liberalism, but none have yet abandoned liberalism for socialism.
 
Frank Apisa said:
FUCK EQUALITY.

If that is what you are efforting toward...even I will oppose you.

Some will always have more than others...and some will always have MUCH MORE than others. In fact, I will go further...it is truly just and appropriate that some have more...even MUCH MORE than others...depending upon contribution to society.

No one should give a rat's ass about that...

...SO LONG AS EVERYONE HAS SUFFICIENT FOR A DECENT LIFE.

If EVERYONE has sufficient food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, educational opportunities, transportation, ability to communicate, and leisure of sorts...IT SHOULD NOT MATTER THAT OTHERS HAVE fancier clothing, fancier houses, bigger cars or leisure opportunities not available to everyone.

(And by "decent"...I mean "abundant.")
Click to expand...

By equality, I mean being able to walk down the street as a Black person without being murdered by LAW ENFORCEMENT because of the color of skin.

By equality, I mean being afforded the same opportunities as whites.

We are not on the same page with this discussion. It's way deeper than what you describe above. Equality not as in material things, but in equality as a people. You have to look beyond the surface and dig deep into American history to understand where I'm coming from. Racism is deep rooted in this country and it's as bad now as it was 100 years ago. We are still not equal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top