The Beast Revelation

“It is unbiblical to use the term ‘Antichrist’ for a present-day or future political ruler.

The proper context is theological and pre-A. D. 70” (Gary DeMar, Last Days Madness, p.204).
 
You hopelessly have Biblical Babble.

Nope.. I like archaeology and history.. The stories are far more meaningful if you learn the symbolism the people of the 1st century understood.

The Beast is either Nero or Domitian, or both.

The Mark of the Beast is the permission to buy and sell based on showing up once a year to worship the Roman Emperor on his birthday.
 
Nope.. I like archaeology and history.. The stories are far more meaningful if you learn the symbolism the people of the 1st century understood.

The Beast is either Nero or Domitian, or both.

The Mark of the Beast is the permission to buy and sell based on showing up once a year to worship the Roman Emperor on his birthday.

Like it or not,there are Prophecies unfulfilled.
Get out of the 1st century and get to the 21 century.
 
Revelation was written in Hebrew?......

no, the so called christian prophesies

Non christian of that time knew nothing about the Torah or Hebrew and it was forbidden that they should be taught , when Paul opened his new religion up to pagans they didn't know of Torah, so how could they say it fulfilled the prophesies in the Hebrew bible

it is obvious that the christian bible's referrals to passages in the Hebrew bible are mist-translations and non understanding of Hebrew, plus non understanding of historical context
 
Like it or not,there are Prophecies unfulfilled.
Get out of the 1st century and get to the 21 century.

Nope most of them were fulfilled by 150 AD..

Projecting into the future is central to the Scofield Heresy.. You know.. NY is Babylon , Gog and Magog is Russia.. and Jesus neglected the faithful of his day to talk to people thousands of years into the future.

Gog and Magog invaded hundreds of years before Christ. The stragglers who stayed behind built a city in the Decapolis called Scythopolis.
 
no, the so called christian prophesies

Non christian of that time knew nothing about the Torah or Hebrew and it was forbidden that they should be taught , when Paul opened his new religion up to pagans they didn't know of Torah, so how could they say it fulfilled the prophesies in the Hebrew bible

it is obvious that the christian bible's referrals to passages in the Hebrew bible are mist-translations and non understanding of Hebrew, plus non understanding of historical context

The original Revelation was written in Hebrew. John of Patmos rewrote it in Greek almost verbatim with a few changes to make it "Christian".
 
The original Revelation was written in Hebrew. John of Patmos rewrote it in Greek almost verbatim with a few changes to make it "Christian".

pure atheist fiction......the common language of the day was neither Hebrew or Greek.....it was Aramaic......
 
no, the so called christian prophesies

Non christian of that time knew nothing about the Torah or Hebrew and it was forbidden that they should be taught , when Paul opened his new religion up to pagans they didn't know of Torah, so how could they say it fulfilled the prophesies in the Hebrew bible

it is obvious that the christian bible's referrals to passages in the Hebrew bible are mist-translations and non understanding of Hebrew, plus non understanding of historical context
sorry, atheist........Jesus Christ fulfilled the prophesies because he was the Messiah........your denials are meaningless........
 
The original Revelation was written in Hebrew. John of Patmos rewrote it in Greek almost verbatim with a few changes to make it "Christian".

there was no previous Revelation.......John wrote the original......no biblical scholars say otherwise......
 
Some Preterists believe that although Christ did come at Pentecost (33 AD) and 70 AD, He will make a final appearance at the end of the world (age).

Others strongly maintain that His second appearance was a spiritual one in 70 AD and that is the end of it.
 
Back
Top