The best part of the zimmerman saga

What a stupid bitch. 1-0??????????????? His victim was unarmed. And don't you worry about my chickens...you best strap up like Zimmie, with your mindset, for all the good it will do. It's a shameful day to be an American ("capitalized", you idiot). They'll get in in the civil suit. He'll never be the same.

trayvon was armed with his fists and the concrete sidewalk. The legal definition of a deadly weapon disagrees with you.

But dont just listen to me, listen to the 6 jurors decided upon by both parties.

Not.

Guilty.
 
Don't you mean his attacker was unarmed?

Did I stutter? He was attacked for at least presenting a "clear and present danger". We don't even know if Zimmerman said any threatening words, or racial pejoratives, because the eyewitness is no longer here. Martin had just as much right as Zimmerman to defend himself. And if Martin had shot Zimmerman, we wouldn't even be having a discussion about guilt, or Justice "deferred".
 
trayvon was armed with his fists and the concrete sidewalk. The legal definition of a deadly weapon disagrees with you.

But dont just listen to me, listen to the 6 jurors decided upon by both parties.

Not.

Guilty.

5 white racist women and 1 black woman. If she disagreed, she was outnumbered. Obviously. Don't worry...the second time is a charm. Ask O.J..
 
Your premise is wrong. Watch doesn't mean stalk or follow. Admit it.....you wish you had been Zimmerman, so you could know the thrill of killing a black boy. It's written all over your rhetoric. But everyone knows you for the coward you are. At least you share that with Zimmie.

I support all of those that use self defense against a violent attacker. If it had been two black people, I would have supported the person that shot the violent attacker. If it was two white people, I would have supported the person that shot the violent attacker. If Zimmerman was black and trayvon was white, I would happily take pride in a black zimmerman shooting his violent attacker.

And in this case, I continue to support the one that defended his body against harm, when he had done nothing illegal before being violently attacked.
 
Your premise is wrong. Watch doesn't mean stalk or follow. Admit it.....you wish you had been Zimmerman, so you could know the thrill of killing a black boy. It's written all over your rhetoric. But everyone knows you for the coward you are. At least you share that with Zimmie.


I believe you are correct. It's all about killing black people. Doesn't matter who's doing the killing as long as the victim is black. Then these kkk motherfuckers blame the victim. Nothing new, it's been happening in this country for centuries.

Killing is ok in the U.S. as long as the body is black and the killer is white.


This is not over by a long shot.
 
5 white racist women and 1 black woman. If she disagreed, she was outnumbered. Obviously. Don't worry...the second time is a charm. Ask O.J..

You clearly didn't watch the case. The State did not prove their case, they had zero evidence against zimmerman. Almost every state witness either emphatically supported zimmerman, or at the very least admitted his account was not inconsistent with the evidence. The lead detective called by the state said he believed zimmerman was being truthful. The witness professor carter talked about self defense and how he would not advise for someone to wait till they are dead to defend themselves. Multiple witnesses on behalf of the state said zimmerman did not have ill will hatred or spite (which is what you need to prove second degree murder).

No matter how much you want to believe otherwise, one has a right to use deadly force if they have a reasonable fear of grave bodily injury, death, or to stop someone from committing a forceable felony upon them.

The state presented no case, and had sparse evidence at best. Reasonable doubt was all over this. Even if you hate zimmerman, the not guilty verdict is the only just verdict that could be returned. Anyone saying otherwise is completely ignorant to the facts of the case and has zero clue as to the content of the trial.
 
I support all of those that use self defense against a violent attacker. If it had been two black people, I would have supported the person that shot the violent attacker. If it was two white people, I would have supported the person that shot the violent attacker. If Zimmerman was black and trayvon was white, I would happily take pride in a black zimmerman shooting his violent attacker.

And in this case, I continue to support the one that defended his body against harm, when he had done nothing illegal before being violently attacked.


Zimm stalked Martin with murderous intent. Martin defended himself against a guy who had stalked him. So you support 'white' people who defend themselves not black people like Treyvon Martin. All your bullshit excuses will never be enough to hide your racism.

Lets face it, you are giddy and overjoyed that a black child was murdered and the 'white' murderer got off because he isn't black.
 
Zimm stalked Martin with murderous intent. Martin defended himself against a guy who had stalked him. So you support 'white' people who defend themselves not black people like Treyvon Martin. All your bullshit excuses will never be enough to hide your racism.

The jury agreed upon by both parties, the one that listened and heard and reviewed every witness, and deliberated for 16 hours, disagrees with you.

no one but the hugest idiots think he had murderous intent that night. There is zero evidence of that. Almost every legal analyst knew that 2nd degree murder was dead in the water after 2-3 days of trial. A lot knew before that. Everyone has talked about zimmerman being overcharged. The less idiotic have agreed by now that manslaughter was at max what zimmerman deserved.

you have no evidence.
certainly not proven.

not guilty.
 
Funny, if the same jury had found Zimmerman guilty the praise from the lefties would have been endless.

obviously. they have never been interested in justice. They just wanted the result that would support their own ignorance. They are lazy motherfuckers that refuse to educate themselves. I am convinced 80% of team trayvon on here barely paid attention to the trial. I have seen people say things that are just completely objectively off base in the context of what transpired during the proceedings.
 
obviously. they have never been interested in justice. They just wanted the result that would support their own ignorance. They are lazy motherfuckers that refuse to educate themselves. I am convinced 80% of team trayvon on here barely paid attention to the trial. I have seen people say things that are just completely objectively off base in the context of what transpired during the proceedings.

Justice? Who's justice? What justice? This justice? http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/23/nyregion/23trial.html?src=tp&_r=3&
 
Justice is when a jury weighs the evidence and renders a verdict.

Just because you don't like the verdict doesn't negate it.
 
I support all of those that use self defense against a violent attacker. If it had been two black people, I would have supported the person that shot the violent attacker. If it was two white people, I would have supported the person that shot the violent attacker. If Zimmerman was black and trayvon was white, I would happily take pride in a black zimmerman shooting his violent attacker.

And in this case, I continue to support the one that defended his body against harm, when he had done nothing illegal before being violently attacked.

BS. Double BS. Infinite BS. Don't backtrack from your racist rhetoric now, as it would be totally uncharacteristic.
 
BS. Double BS. Infinite BS. Don't backtrack from your racist rhetoric now, as it would be totally uncharacteristic.

what is racist rhetoric? Not agreeing with you? Every time an african american violently assaults someone for doing nothing illegal I must defend them or I am a racist? I believe in self defense, and I believe in gun rights. I believe in shooting those that violently attack those that have done nothing illegal, and that is exactly what happened that night.
 
what is racist rhetoric? Not agreeing with you? Every time an african american violently assaults someone for doing nothing illegal I must defend them or I am a racist? I believe in self defense, and I believe in gun rights. I believe in shooting those that violently attack those that have done nothing illegal, and that is exactly what happened that night.

No, bitch...coming to the conclusion you came to. And for the reasons you listed. I totally disagree with your perception. In your mind, Martin was in the wrong. In my mind, Zimmerman was completely in the wrong. What about Martin's self defense. I guess he had none because he was black.
You people have lost your fucking minds, and if you don't get it together, it will be nutjobs like you that bring on a race war. Because, trust me.....Trayvon Martin was the camel's back. We are not taking it anymore. Kill another black youngster. And wait.
 
Back
Top