NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
You continue to prove my point.
No wonder you argue with Dutch.
You share many of the very same attributes.
The Covid Jab Jive: a gentle reminder
- Thread starter Taichiliberal
- Start date
No wonder you argue with Dutch.
You share many of the very same attributes.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
You can parrot yourself until doomsday, but you cannot point for point logically or factually prove what you say. Sight the EXACT post(s) that demonstrate the objective reader what you say and THEN it can be determined if what you say is true. Anything else is just more smoke blowing and BS from you. Carry on.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
I'm not wasting the time to pour through posts to find what I know is there.
You refused to discuss the ramifications of the House electing POTUS on multiple occasions.
We didn't even have an argument as to whether it was good or bad.
You refused to discuss it at all, and without discussing it,
your other points. good or bad, weren't meaningful or debatable..
You decide in advance the outcomes you like, and then fabricate a questionable argument to support them,
reality always being far from a consideration, just as Dutch does..
You go so far as to apply totally clueless interpretations as to the what the OTHER person said,
just as Dutch does, even though your views may be in conflict with his.
If I keep bringing up the things that you refuser to consider,
then of course it will look as though I'm parroting myself.
I'm not blowing smoke. You're refusing to meaningfully engage, and I'm pointing that out.
My REAL mistake, however, is trying to engage you in logical discourse of which you're apparently incapable.
That is in fact on me
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
You took time and effort to post the same old dodgy blather. You're just full of it. I'm done here with you.
Daylight63
Verified User
Here's a peer-reviewed article from 2024 (that's this year):
"Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has proved ineffective in treating patients hospitalised with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), but uncertainty remains over its safety and efficacy in chemoprevention. Previous chemoprevention randomised controlled trials (RCTs) did not individually show benefit of HCQ against COVID-19 and, although meta-analysis did suggest clinical benefit, guidelines recommend against its use." (Highlighted the important part in red).
You can find the article here: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004428
I encourage every leftie that wants one to go for it. I think you would be at #9 if you want to stay current..
Daylight63
Verified User
I've kept up with all mine.
Don't worry. I'll come see you in the hospital. I didn't realize it but you can actually be conscious with a respirator shoved down your throat. When I watched my brother struggling on a respirator it looked really uncomfortable.
You have no idea hoe happy that makes me.
While you anxiously await #10, I will continue to mill around among the unmasked masses. For some odd reason, my immune system remains intact. It must be the booze.
Perhaps you haven't heard. All those respirators that faucci told us to have on hand, were actually killing people and are no longer used for the treatment of a cold.
If you do visit a hospital room, stop at Costco first and purchase a large tray of cookies for the nurse's station, they are all angels.
Daylight63
Verified User
Gosh, I HADN'T heard that. Thanks for the information. I hope you will realize I don't actually trust your word for it so I'll just go off on my own to do the research.
OOPS! Turns out that's a false narrative.
Viral headline twists study about ventilators and COVID-19 deaths
A headline shared widely on social media is spreading an erroneous narrative that COVID-19 deaths were actually caused by medical interventions, not the disease.
apnews.com
The study actually says somethign quite different. “One of the major features that we found that contributes to poor outcomes is if patients develop a secondary pneumonia, meaning a pneumonia that occurs while they’re already on the ventilator for pneumonia,” Singer said. “And specifically, if that secondary pneumonia does not resolve, meaning that despite antibiotics and supportive care, the patient does not resolve their pneumonia.”
I guess it pays to check up on just about everything the MAGA crowd says because most of the time they are wrong or lying about something.
Huh. Surprising.
We bought a bunch of gift bags for the nurses in both the neurological ICU as well as some of the nurses in the general floor.
We didn't then go around passing out bad medical information to other people.
You need to understand the difference between a ventilator and a respirator.Gosh, I HADN'T heard that. Thanks for the information. I hope you will realize I don't actually trust your word for it so I'll just go off on my own to do the research.
OOPS! Turns out that's a false narrative.
Viral headline twists study about ventilators and COVID-19 deaths
A headline shared widely on social media is spreading an erroneous narrative that COVID-19 deaths were actually caused by medical interventions, not the disease.
The study actually says somethign quite different. “One of the major features that we found that contributes to poor outcomes is if patients develop a secondary pneumonia, meaning a pneumonia that occurs while they’re already on the ventilator for pneumonia,” Singer said. “And specifically, if that secondary pneumonia does not resolve, meaning that despite antibiotics and supportive care, the patient does not resolve their pneumonia.”
I guess it pays to check up on just about everything the MAGA crowd says because most of the time they are wrong or lying about something.
Huh. Surprising.
We bought a bunch of gift bags for the nurses in both the neurological ICU as well as some of the nurses in the general floor.
We didn't then go around passing out bad medical information to other people.
Surprising huh?
Daylight63
Verified User
So you can't point to any actual study that supports your claim? I'm not entirely surprised.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review
Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review - PubMed
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in some but not all studies. We hypothesized that a systematic review would show HCQ to be effective against COVID-19, more effective when provided earlier, not associated with worsening disease and safe. We...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Daylight63
Verified User
I'm going to out on a limb here and say:
"Whatever it is you do for a living is made up ONLY of grifters and thieves who will say and do whatever they need to to get money."
Does that feel about right? Because that is EXACTLY what you are saying to scientists.
If you believe that that is how science works then it is because that is how YOUR BUSINESS OPERATES.
What does that say about YOU?
Follow the money. Now that is science.