Ok. One black guy.
He doesn't have the right to viciously assault someone because he's black.Or trayvons right to stand his ground.
but hes black so you don't think he has that right
He doesn't have the right to viciously assault someone because he's black.
He was an angry little thug who wanted to beat up duh creepy ass cracka like he daid that bus driver he 'swung on'.
You realize there was evidence on his cell phone which couldn't be presented at the trial, right? Talking about how you can win fights by mounting someone and other similar things.
against the guy who rushed him in the dark and then got on him
You have NO proof trayvon attacked zimmerman .
In fact the evidence says other wise.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/...Could-Have-Been-Averted-if-Only-He-Had-a-Gun#
Tue Jul 16, 2013 at 09:26 AM PDT.
Why Isn't NRA Arguing Trayvon Martin Tragedy Could Have Been Averted if Only He Had a Gun?
imagine if open carrying wasn't illegal. the gun would have been seen and nobody would have attempted to assault the other.http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/...Could-Have-Been-Averted-if-Only-He-Had-a-Gun#
Tue Jul 16, 2013 at 09:26 AM PDT.
Why Isn't NRA Arguing Trayvon Martin Tragedy Could Have Been Averted if Only He Had a Gun?