The Death of Dilbert and False Claims of White Victimhood

The constitution guarantees you a right against government imposed consequences. That is all. You can have consequences from a business or other people without violating the constitutional doctrine of free speech.

Yes which is what i have been saying constantly, so thank you for agreeing with me.

What Ron DeSantis and Trump continually try to do is use the gov't to impose consequences on and to shut down free speech and free association.

If a Social media company, cruise line or Disney or a local diner in Florida wants to say no shirts, no shoes, no service, or no mask no service, or say XYZ and we will ban you, ...that is their free speech and free association right. The customer can tell them to go fuck it and spend their dollars elsewhere as a consequence. But if gov't jumps in and says you must serve them or you must let them say XYZ that is NOT free speech or association. It is gov't fascism. That is what Trump and DeSantis push, fascism.
 
A lobbyist gets paid. There are a few here who may fit that bill, but almost all are amateurs having a diversion.

A lobbyist gets paid, yes, for promoting -- to govt. officials -- the POV of their employer or a legislative request. That is not at all the same as someone who writes a blog article about how wonderful Gov. DeSatan is and what a great idea he had to spend taxpayer money to go to Texas, find some processed asylum-seekers, and fly them to Marthas Vineyard. Or someone else who writes in her blog what a POS he was for doing that.

Which blogger do you think they're targeting here?
 
A lobbyist gets paid, yes, for promoting -- to govt. officials -- the POV of their employer or a legislative request. That is not at all the same as someone who writes a blog article about how wonderful Gov. DeSatan is and what a great idea he had to spend taxpayer money to go to Texas, find some processed asylum-seekers, and fly them to Marthas Vineyard. Or someone else who writes in her blog what a POS he was for doing that.

Which blogger do you think they're targeting here?
You refuse to show that anyone is being targeted ... because you know that's just your standard dishonesty oozing out.

Why haven't you posted the text in question from the bill in question? Is it because you made it all up?

Coward.
 
Yes which is what i have been saying constantly, so thank you for agreeing with me.

What Ron DeSantis and Trump continually try to do is use the gov't to impose consequences on and to shut down free speech and free association.

If a Social media company, cruise line or Disney or a local diner in Florida wants to say no shirts, no shoes, no service, or no mask no service, or say XYZ and we will ban you, ...that is their free speech and free association right. The customer can tell them to go fuck it and spend their dollars elsewhere as a consequence. But if gov't jumps in and says you must serve them or you must let them say XYZ that is NOT free speech or association. It is gov't fascism. That is what Trump and DeSantis push, fascism.

But it’s ok if DeSantis does it, “cuz he owns the libs!”
 
Leftists are generally stupid and undereducated, and you are a shining example.

Try again, and this time post into this thread only the portion of the bill in question, not a link to the entirety of the bill.

Intelligence would be your friend if you wouldn't reject it outright.

Yea places lie the NE are stupid not like in intelligent people in Alabama, Mississippi and jesusland :laugh:
 
Leftists are generally stupid and undereducated, and you are a shining example.

Try again, and this time post into this thread only the portion of the bill in question, not a link to the entirety of the bill.

Intelligence would be your friend if you wouldn't reject it outright.

You're a shining example of an entitled, lazy poser who wants to be spoon-fed instead of doing a little bit of work yourself. And if you actually look at the bill, the portion in question, Section 3, is typed in green.

Now put on your bifocals, zoom into the section and voila! It's not that difficult, hotshot.
 
Total number of members: 17. :laugh:

We have a winner here!

Click on the profile of his socks and note who his "friends" are. Great American's sock Terri4Trump is two of them.

Great American played a veteran in drag. Did Sybil have cybersex with "her"? It wouldn't be the first time a Trumper was caught sexting another guy. LOL
 
Leftists are generally stupid and undereducated, and you are a shining example.

Try again, and this time post into this thread only the portion of the bill in question, not a link to the entirety of the bill.

Intelligence would be your friend if you wouldn't reject it outright.
Projection
 
You're a shining example of an entitled, lazy poser who wants to be spoon-fed instead of doing a little bit of work yourself.
Give it up. This is the standard stupid, undereducated leftist's desperation when his/her dishonesty is exposed.

Recap:

ThatOwlCoward claimed that the bill stifles free speech by forcing bloggers to be regulated as lobbyists.

I think ThatOwlCoward is being totally dishonest, as usual, so I mentioned that she did not post in this thread the part of the bill that she claims accomplishes this.

In a very dim-witted way, you posted a link to the text of the entire bill, inviting me to search for text that I know doesn't exist.

So I throw it back at you and ask you to post the section of the bill that forces bloggers into lobbyist regulation.

You then bitch and moan and whine and gripe and throw your little temper tantrum that I'm somehow too lazy to cover for your dishonesty.

Conclusion:

Post the text of the bill of which you speak in this thread or acknowledge that ThatOwlCoward is once again pulling shit out of her mouth.
 
Back
Top