The Democrats had my support

The Democrats had my support when they condemned the police killing of George Floyd.

The Democrats lost my support when they allowed the looting and firebombing of our cities.

And now the Democrats condemn the president for wanting to send troops to protect our cities and people.

How were the Dems supposed to stop it? The cities are not in peril. The Dems allowed it? WTF.
 
The Democrats had my support when they condemned the police killing of George Floyd.

The Democrats lost my support when they allowed the looting and firebombing of our cities.

And now the Democrats condemn the president for wanting to send troops to protect our cities and people.

Have they really allowed the looting? They sent out cops to stop the looters and arrested a bunch of them, they just don't want to use the military.
 
I don't care for Trump, but what choice do I have. Biden wants to open the boarders and allow millions of Mexicans and Muslims into our nation. I do not think that would be wise to do so.

Damn it. No fucking body wants open borders. The border fencing was built and maintained during Dem and Repub administrations. There is fencing everywhere it is required. Trump wants a show fence in areas that are not crossed.
Illegals come in on planes. There are very few who will brave walking through the desert to work in American farms. They come in through the border crossings. That is also where drugs pass through.
 
I honestly don't know what Biden wants and I'm not so sure he does either. But definitely dems in gen'l want open borders. And I find that a bit scary. I know of no other country with open borders with the exception of Germany recently and temporarily and it backfired bigtime.

Can you provide some evidence of this, or do you merely comfort yourself and your reprehensible political views with lies?
 
Cherub thought he was being slick and would fool the left. it was a big failure. We saw him from post 1 as a pretender.,because lefties can analyze a lot better.
 
Can you provide some evidence of this, or do you merely comfort yourself and your reprehensible political views with lies?

Advocating the closing of border detention centers, decriminalization of illegal entry, accepting anyone claiming asylum, advocating free health care for illegals which we don't even provide for a majority of our own citizens is inviting them, sanctuary cities where violent criminals have more protection from the law than citizens. You may not call these policies "open borders" but that's what it is.
 
Advocating the closing of border detention centers, decriminalization of illegal entry, accepting anyone claiming asylum, advocating free health care for illegals which we don't even provide for a majority of our own citizens is inviting them, sanctuary cities where violent criminals have more protection from the law than citizens. You may not call these policies "open borders" but that's what it is.

No one supports concentration camps. Not sure why that's controversial.

Apart from that, do you have any proof that these are policies in the Dem platform? Because literally none of them are. By law, we're supposed to consider asylum claims, so that's a complete red-herring.

Do you know what a red-herring is, you borderline-literate fuck?
 
Damn it. No fucking body wants open borders. The border fencing was built and maintained during Dem and Repub administrations. There is fencing everywhere it is required. Trump wants a show fence in areas that are not crossed.
Illegals come in on planes. There are very few who will brave walking through the desert to work in American farms. They come in through the border crossings. That is also where drugs pass through.

The Democrats are against deporting illegals. So yes, that is open borders.
 
I honestly don't know what Biden wants and I'm not so sure he does either. But definitely dems in gen'l want open borders. And I find that a bit scary. I know of no other country with open borders with the exception of Germany recently and temporarily and it backfired bigtime.

Completely disagree with this statement. I have seen very few Dems advocating for 'open borders'. I guess it depends on your definition. The immigration reform that has been proposed over the last decade is most certainly NOT open borders in any way shape or form. It hasn't been Democrats that have killed immigration reform. It's Republicans. 'Build that Wall' is not a plan. It's a slogan.
 
The Democrats are against deporting illegals. So yes, that is open borders.

That's your definition? First, I would argue with that blanket statement. Obama was the great deporter. And dems have proposed paths to citizenship, which is most certainly NOT being 'against deporting illegals'. It is completely impractical from a logistics standpoint and a practical standpoint to deport every person here illegally. Second, advocating for a path to citizenship is not in any way, shape or form 'open borders'. That term is just a Trump punchline at this point. It's nonsense.
 
That's your definition? First, I would argue with that blanket statement. Obama was the great deporter. And dems have proposed paths to citizenship, which is most certainly NOT being 'against deporting illegals'. It is completely impractical from a logistics standpoint and a practical standpoint to deport every person here illegally. Second, advocating for a path to citizenship is not in any way, shape or form 'open borders'. That term is just a Trump punchline at this point. It's nonsense.

If you watched the Democratic primaries, you saw that Obama was mercilessly criticized for deporting ILLEGAL immigrants. Even Biden, who constantly takes credit for being Obama's VP, distanced himself from Obama when immigration came up.
A path to citizenship for immigrants who came here illegally is amnesty and thus open borders. If anyone is allowed to migrate here without any repercussions, then that is open borders.
 
If you watched the Democratic primaries, you saw that Obama was mercilessly criticized for deporting ILLEGAL immigrants. Even Biden, who constantly takes credit for being Obama's VP, distanced himself from Obama when immigration came up.
A path to citizenship for immigrants who came here illegally is amnesty and thus open borders. If anyone is allowed to migrate here without any repercussions, then that is open borders.

No it isn't amnesty. But it is practical. I'm not denying that we should address the immigration. There have been many attempts to do so. You are painting with a ridiculously broad brush. Your definition is nonsense. No one is allowed to migrate here without following the rules. Not anyone can come here for any reason.
 
No it isn't amnesty. But it is practical. I'm not denying that we should address the immigration. There have been many attempts to do so. You are painting with a ridiculously broad brush. Your definition is nonsense. No one is allowed to migrate here without following the rules. Not anyone can come here for any reason.

If illegal immigrants don't get deported, then what exactly stops anyone from coming here? And how is that not amnesty? We'd essentially be saying that you broke the law, but we'll let you get away with it.
 
Back
Top