The difference between Communism and Fascism

fascism is not necessarily totalitarian, or nationalistic.

fascism today is predominantly internationalist in nature.

check my sig re: internationalist fascism.

Fascism, like any form of socialism, is theft of wealth. It can only be implemented by oligarchy or dictatorship. Implementing it is totalitarian by nature.

Fascism exists in every nation. So does communism, and so does capitalism.
 
Doesn't mean the statement is correct.

The only major difference between Fascism and Communism is that the former is Nationalist, while the later is Internationalist.

No. There is no such thing as international communism nor fascism. There is no international government. The UN is not a government.
 
nwpPYHN.png

Communism is not governed by the people. Neither is fascism.
Both require an oligarchy or dictatorship to implement.

There is no merit to either communism nor fascism, and no merit for an oligarchy or dictatorship.
 
Wrong. Both seek to remove class from society. Both seek to strip the rich and powerful of their wealth and power handing it to the state. In Communism, the economy is taken over by the state. In Fascism, the economy is directed by the state in minute detail, but the means of production remain private with strict restrictions on profit.

From the Nazi political platform:



Nationalism is a big part of Fascism. The state is everything. Internationalism is a big part of Communism. We must spread our ideas everywhere.

Hitler wanted to take over the world. You don't call that 'internationalism'?
 
Communism can never be achieved. It's that simple. It defies basic human nature.

Above the tribal/village level, I agree. Whenever representatives need to be elected, that's when a one-party systems falters. At least two-parties are needed to keep the other side in check.

OTOH, if one or both sides starts cheating and violating the laws, either legally or in spirit, then the system self-destructs.

The Republican Party of 2021 is killing democracy and our Constitution. The answer is certainly not communism, but it's not letting authoritarian assholes take over out of trumped up fears of the fucking socialists.
 
Hitler wanted to take over the world. You don't call that 'internationalism'?

Not true. Hitler wanted Lebenstraum. He wanted, to claim what he considered historical "German" lands. Mussolini, similarly, wanted to restore Italy's control over lands the Romans had controlled. Neither had much if any view of taking over the planet.

On the other hand, Communism did.

https://www.marxists.org/history/international/comintern/index.htm

The object of the International was to bring Communist revolution to every nation and incorporate it into a one-world state where Communism ran the planet.
 
Back
Top