The evil 1%ers

Evmetro said:
If all wealth were stripped from the top 1% and distributed into equal slices of pie for everybody, there would simply be a new top 1%. Would lefties still hate the new top 1%? How many times would the newest top 1% have to be stripped of their wealth and their wealth distributed into equal pie slices for all before you would not resent the top 1%?
Click to expand...

then we would start over again.

Life doesn't occur at warp speed.
It takes a while for the greed seed to sprout.

I'd like an order of lobsters while the seed is still in the ground.
 
Evmetro said:
If all wealth were stripped from the top 1% and distributed into equal slices of pie for everybody, there would simply be a new top 1%. Would lefties still hate the new top 1%? How many times would the newest top 1% have to be stripped of their wealth and their wealth distributed into equal pie slices for all before you would not resent the top 1%?
Click to expand...

Continiously until they get to me, at which point, we good.
 
Legion said:
Isn't it true that right now the three wealthiest people in America all support DEMOCRATS?

Why don't they just sell all they own and give the government all their money?
Click to expand...

Notice how many lefties here refuse to answer the opening post? There is a conflict in my opening post that they cannot reconcile.
 
Old Trapper said:
First off, your premise is based on a lie. No one has spoken of stripping the 1% of their wealth unlike people like yourself that would gladly strip the bottom 80% of their wealth to give to the 1%. Nor has anyone declared that wealth is to be "evenly distributed".
Click to expand...

Presenting a recreational and hypothetical situation is far from being a lie. Do you understand the definition of "lie"?

Your next error revolves around the lack of knowledge as to the ideology of the Founding Fathers. It was they who wrote the liberal concept of the country opposing monopolies, corporations, inherited wealth, etc. Profit sharing was their idea, not hourly wages.
Click to expand...

Presenting a recreational and hypothetical situation is not an error. The only error we see here is how you were unable to respond to a hypothetical and recreational opening post.

Knowing that, why would you oppose the ideology of the Founders, and also that of Christ, and virtually every other religious leader in the history of mankind save for the current crop of greedy bastards?
Click to expand...

I cannot seem to connect this to the opening post, sorry. What is stopping you from responding appropriately to the opening post?
 
Checkered Demon said:
then we would start over again.

Life doesn't occur at warp speed.
It takes a while for the greed seed to sprout.

I'd like an order of lobsters while the seed is still in the ground.
Click to expand...

How many times would the newest top 1% have to be stripped of their wealth and their wealth distributed into equal pie slices for all before you would not resent the top 1%?
 
Evmetro said:
Presenting a recreational and hypothetical situation is far from being a lie. Do you understand the definition of "lie"?
Click to expand...

In your case this would be a good example of a lie: "Would lefties still hate the new top 1%?"

Presenting a recreational and hypothetical situation is not an error. The only error we see here is how you were unable to respond to a hypothetical and recreational opening post.
Click to expand...

Or you could have stated it was a hypothetical rather then letting it appear like all the beliefs of the rabid right wing.

I cannot seem to connect this to the opening post, sorry. What is stopping you from responding appropriately to the opening post?
Click to expand...

"Appropriately" in who'e eyes? You with your limited intellect? I gave you a clue when I pointed out your second error. Sorry you were not intelligent enough to understand it.
 
Legion said:
That wasn't the link the racist used in her desperate deflection attempt, Mature Masturbator.

It doesn't say the practice is illegal, does it?
Click to expand...

Before flapping your fat useless little wings, try reading the article:

"Despite laws banning foreign money in American elections [1], loopholes in our campaign finance system have left our electoral process vulnerable to spending by foreign governments, corporations and foreign nationals. Foreign entities can and have spent unchecked and undisclosed money to influence U.S. elections. One of the largest vulnerabilities was created by the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision [2], which gave corporations the same rights as people to spend unlimited amounts of money on elections."

<skip>

STRONGER DISCLOSURE LAWS

Strong disclosure laws would prevent foreign governments from the ability to hide their donations in 501(c)4 dark money groups and could shine light on foreign owned companies that are spending in U.S. elections. They would also help prevent the illegal use of LLC shell corporations as a means to funnel money into elections."
 
Last edited:
Old Trapper said:
Before flapping your fat little wings, try reading the artiv]cle:

"Despite laws banning foreign money in American elections [1], loopholes in our campaign finance system have left our electoral process vulnerable to spending by foreign governments, corporations and foreign nationals. Foreign entities can and have spent unchecked and undisclosed money to influence U.S. elections. One of the largest vulnerabilities was created by the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision [2], which gave corporations the same rights as people to spend unlimited amounts of money on elections."
Click to expand...

Never gonna happen.
 
Evmetro said:
If all wealth were stripped from the top 1% and distributed into equal slices of pie for everybody, there would simply be a new top 1%. Would lefties still hate the new top 1%? How many times would the newest top 1% have to be stripped of their wealth and their wealth distributed into equal pie slices for all before you would not resent the top 1%?
Click to expand...

It's amazing how many one percenters you run into these days...
 
Evmetro said:
If all wealth were stripped from the top 1% and distributed into equal slices of pie for everybody, there would simply be a new top 1%. Would lefties still hate the new top 1%? How many times would the newest top 1% have to be stripped of their wealth and their wealth distributed into equal pie slices for all before you would not resent the top 1%?
Click to expand...
The stupid threads you find on these pages. This is in effect what this guy is promoting , a tax System that makes it all but impossible to gain the American dream, the promise of the possibility to get ahead. 45 years of the massive new wealth in this country going to no one, other then pennies, to the top few. That is simply a fact and that is what these people want for this country. If you take the incentive to get ahead out of capitalism , it will die and in this country it will take my country with it. They want it all and there willing to sell out this country to achieve that.
 
Evmetro said:
If all wealth were stripped from the top 1% and distributed into equal slices of pie for everybody, there would simply be a new top 1%. Would lefties still hate the new top 1%? How many times would the newest top 1% have to be stripped of their wealth and their wealth distributed into equal pie slices for all before you would not resent the top 1%?
Click to expand...
This is what the hate party supports, Amazon the first trillion dollar company pays no taxes. Scum bag their leader pays no taxes.

notax.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top