Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
No, it’s separate from how. How and why are different inquiries.
Thanks.
No, it’s separate from how. How and why are different inquiries.
Exactly what I posted.
Are you drinking, Perry? You seem to do a lot of day posting and it wouldn't surprise me if that included day drinking.
Is one reason you are so stressed that you are between jobs?
In aviation safety, we ask a lot of similar "how did this occur" questions.
Fair enough. You can't put it in your own words. Got it. (Another bit of intellectual laziness on your part...but definitely "on brand")
Ahhh, more diagnoses from the board's own fake "psychologist".
Wow. You are SO BAD at this! It's hilarious!
Thanks for the laugh, though. LOLOLOLOLOL.
LOL Yes. Also, thanks for proving you don't have a clue about my career.Oh god, now you are in "aviation safety"?????
How questions to what degree or by what method, why determines purpose or for what meaning.Thanks.
that sounds right.How questions to what degree or by what method, why determines purpose or for what meaning.
I tend to view how questions as mechanistic and materialistic , and why questions as typically phylsophical, teleological, or metaphysical.
Why do you believe that?
Isaac Newton
How questions to what degree or by what method, why determines purpose or for what meaning.
LOL Yes. Also, thanks for proving you don't have a clue about my career.
Abraham Lincoln
You could have just wrote that you didn't know what Newton said about the nature of his laws of motion, and action at a distance
Agreed. How is an inquisitive question used to determine how something works. Why looks for purpose or meaning.
You are always an asshole. Not even entertaining anymore.
Your Abraham Lincoln retort was intended to be snarky.
When I wrote Isaac Newton was my touchstone on the question at hand, that was a genuine and honest answer.
We can explain how the Big Bang happened. We can't mechanistically explain why it happened.
Disagreed, Ms. BP.You are always an asshole. Not even entertaining anymore.You could have just wrote that you didn't know what Newton said about the nature of his laws of motion, and action at a distance
Remember when I chided you for leaping to conclusions, Perry PhD? You're doing it again. LOLIt sounds like you were a psychological screener (per your own claims) and now you are in aviation safety. Did you work for an airline? Jet Blue perhaps? Or were you USAF or something? I'm guessing military since I believe you once made some oblique reference to USAF.
Your career isn't as interesting to me since I doubt very highly you were worth much in it. I can DEFINITELY see your failures in terms of technical topics and science (even the science you claim you got your degree in.)
But you are right, I don't know what your career entailed. I can see you are generally a prick on here which I assume somehow correlates with real life, but again, you could be like me and just letting your hair down. Only difference between us is I'm honest about it.
Remember when I chided you for leaping to conclusions, Perry PhD? You're doing it again. LOL
Then don't worry about it. Just keep leaping to conclusions. I know I can use the laughs and expect a few others will too.
Yes, some people think being told the blunt truth is being a "prick". I disagree. I call it "brass tacks". When I told you shortly after you arrived, my words "pricked" your fragile ego, and you've been angry at me ever since. Your choice. C'est la vie!