The Gun debate renewed

Nordberg said:
Nobody was trained.
Click to expand...
what gives you that idea?
Nordberg said:
There should be a national licensing program. You cannot have reasonable and intelligent gun laws and let people from Florida and Texas carry them to other states.
We actually should allow far fewer guns in America. They are lost, stolen, and sold to questionable people regularly.
Click to expand...

and this is why we will not let you make such laws............you will lose.
 
Concart said:
Because they choose to. Wow, are you really this dumb?
Click to expand...

absolutely ridiculous, you stupid moron. It's called the full faith and credit clause.........otherwise you'd have stupid shit going on like gov. Newsom instituting a 'no texas drivers in california' bullshit.

god you're a fucking constitutional idiot.
 
Concart said:
Yawn.
Click to expand...

hey, you're free to live in ignorance, but it will be at your own peril. If you can honestly believe that the stupid fuckers you saw at the capitol on 1/6 make up the backbone and majority of die hard 2nd Amendment gun owners, you are in for quite the shock should you try for gun prohibitions and/or confiscations.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
yeah, lies like that......that's all your sorry ass is capable of. how does it feel?

knowing that you are that big of a coward?
Click to expand...
Feel free to put me on ignore and go back to polishing your helmet with your WSE buds. :thup:

The irony of White Feather calling me a coward is deliciously funny.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Feel free to put me on ignore and go back to polishing your helmet with your WSE buds. :thup:

The irony of White Feather calling me a coward is deliciously funny.
Click to expand...

what's even funnier is I don't have to lie about what you post. you have to lie about mine to feel better about your sorry ass.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
what's even funnier is I don't have to lie about what you post. you have to lie about mine to feel better about your sorry ass.
Click to expand...
Where's the lie, DtM? Are you denying you and your "unit" would murder a Fed who infiltrated your group?

SmarterthanYou said:
......my new unit has been together a while...we'd know if there was a traitorous government fuckstick among us....he'd have been disappeared already
Click to expand...
 
SmarterthanYou said:
talking about a social contract is meaningless, because it doesn't exist and NOBODY has ever signed one.

now, your hyperbolic bullshit aside, the REASON we stop at stop signs and obey speed limits is because of state constitutions. you've probably never read yours, but i'm reasonably sure that every single one of them gives over some power to the states to regulate the roadways. things like how many lanes, stop signs, speed limits, etc. THAT is why we do those things and it's not considered losing freedom because the regulations are provided with constitutional authority.



guess what else was included in the framers work? 'shall make no law', 'shall not be infringed', among other things.
Click to expand...

"Nobody ever signed the social contract," is it any wonder he doesn't understand how "freedom" is an abstract concept and not a bumper sticker?

So you stop at Stop signs because the State tells you to, in other words, the Government can regulate your "freedom," yet, in other circumstances, one's you want to be true, your desires, the Gov't can not. You are actually contradicting yourself

And all those "freedoms" from your understanding that are guaranteed under "shall make no law', 'shall not be infringed," have always been regulated, even dating back to the time of the Founders
 
archives said:
"Nobody ever signed the social contract," is it any wonder he doesn't understand how "freedom" is an abstract concept and not a bumper sticker?

So you stop at Stop signs because the State tells you to, in other words, the Government can regulate your "freedom," yet, in other circumstances, one's you want to be true, your desires, the Gov't can not. You are actually contradicting yourself

And all those "freedoms" from your understanding that are guaranteed under "shall make no law', 'shall not be infringed," have always been regulated, even dating back to the time of the Founders
Click to expand...

you could have just said that you can't understand how constitutional governments work and that you dont' even want to. as long as someone, i.e. government, tells me what to do and when to do it, you're golden. who needs to learn history when big daddy gov can tell me what it means.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
hey, you're free to live in ignorance, but it will be at your own peril. If you can honestly believe that the stupid fuckers you saw at the capitol on 1/6 make up the backbone and majority of die hard 2nd Amendment gun owners, you are in for quite the shock should you try for gun prohibitions and/or confiscations.
Click to expand...

GLWT! He's clueless. He will continue to mindlessly chant.
 
archives said:
"Nobody ever signed the social contract," is it any wonder he doesn't understand how "freedom" is an abstract concept and not a bumper sticker?

So you stop at Stop signs because the State tells you to, in other words, the Government can regulate your "freedom," yet, in other circumstances, one's you want to be true, your desires, the Gov't can not. You are actually contradicting yourself

And all those "freedoms" from your understanding that are guaranteed under "shall make no law', 'shall not be infringed," have always been regulated, even dating back to the time of the Founders
Click to expand...

Are are free to make your own decisions. You are NOT free of the consequences of those decisions.
If you like running stop signs, you are putting other people at risk of injury or death besides yourself. Cops have a legitimate reason to stop you, and States have a legitimate reason to penalize you for it.

It is unconstitutional to ban or limit any weapon, including any gun.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
hey, you're free to live in ignorance, but it will be at your own peril. If you can honestly believe that the stupid fuckers you saw at the capitol on 1/6 make up the backbone and majority of die hard 2nd Amendment gun owners, you are in for quite the shock should you try for gun prohibitions and/or confiscations.
Click to expand...

I'll be sure to have a drink in the hot tub while you are crouched combat style ready to stop the evil men from taking your guns. I'm sure CNN will cover it.
 
Concart said:
I'll be sure to have a drink in the hot tub while you are crouched combat style ready to stop the evil men from taking your guns. I'm sure CNN will cover it.
Click to expand...

He'll probably end up shooting the mailman or UPS lady and then turn it into a Turner Diary version of the Alamo before offing himself and his family.

Nutjob are nutjobs, which makes them fairly predictable. Violent nutjobs who constantly write about killing Americans and overthrowing the US and state governments are predictable nutjobs. They move in certain circles, both online and IRL. They have limited behaviors, education levels, IQs and rationals which makes them predictable.

He's looking for a violent end and is actively looking for a way to make it happen. IMO, that's nuts.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you could have just said that you can't understand how constitutional governments work and that you dont' even want to. as long as someone, i.e. government, tells me what to do and when to do it, you're golden. who needs to learn history when big daddy gov can tell me what it means.
Click to expand...

Not even that complicated, you claim freedom is absolute and then confirm the Gov’t can regulate freedom, you contradicted yourself
 
Into the Night said:
Are are free to make your own decisions. You are NOT free of the consequences of those decisions.
If you like running stop signs, you are putting other people at risk of injury or death besides yourself. Cops have a legitimate reason to stop you, and States have a legitimate reason to penalize you for it.

It is unconstitutional to ban or limit any weapon, including any gun.
Click to expand...

So you are confirming my point, the Enlightenment thinkers point, freedom is based upon reason, not desire

Thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top