The Horror Of Slavery.

Threedee said:
The CSA had no right to order American troops out of their fort. It doesn't matter if they gave them four weeks or 99 years.

The North was offering the South a constitutional amendment protecting slavery in the south. The South rejected this, and chose secession. It's pretty clear that they were not a rational or reasonable people.
Click to expand...

That's basically what I was getting at. Why did the Southerners want them to leave. Calling them unrational is the easy answer. But there must have been some reason. And this is the first time I've heard about any proposed amendment that would have allowed Southern states to keep slavery. If it did happen, it must be that it didn't stand a chance in hell of passing. Otherwise, why would the Southern states choose war. Maybe it was for the same reason that there was an American revolution. Because the Southerners didn't like being taxed. Who knows. Not me.
All that aside, I have written other threads that nobody will comment on. It kind of makes me wonder why you are doing so here.
 
coolzone said:
That's basically what I was getting at. Why did the Southerners want them to leave. Calling them unrational is the easy answer. But there must have been some reason. And this is the first time I've heard about any proposed amendment that would have allowed Southern states to keep slavery. If it did happen, it must be that it didn't stand a chance in hell of passing. Otherwise, why would the Southern states choose war. Maybe it was for the same reason that there was an American revolution. Because the Southerners didn't like being taxed. Who knows. Not me.
All that aside, I have written other threads that nobody will comment on. It kind of makes me wonder why you are doing so here.
Click to expand...

If they didn't like being taxed, they could have mentioned it in their secession documents. Instead, all they did was harp-on about slavery.
 
coolzone said:
That's basically what I was getting at. Why did the Southerners want them to leave. Calling them unrational is the easy answer. But there must have been some reason. And this is the first time I've heard about any proposed amendment that would have allowed Southern states to keep slavery. If it did happen, it must be that it didn't stand a chance in hell of passing. Otherwise, why would the Southern states choose war. Maybe it was for the same reason that there was an American revolution. Because the Southerners didn't like being taxed. Who knows. Not me.
All that aside, I have written other threads that nobody will comment on. It kind of makes me wonder why you are doing so here.
Click to expand...

The reason I'm here is written under my avatar.
 
Threedee said:
The CSA had no right to order American troops out of their fort. It doesn't matter if they gave them four weeks or 99 years.

The North was offering the South a constitutional amendment protecting slavery in the south. The South rejected this, and chose secession. It's pretty clear that they were not a rational or reasonable people.
Click to expand...

Compared to the north the south were quite illiterate and much less educated.

That's why the gop hates public education. They want to dumb down america. trump's pick as the education secretary proves that.
 
UnkaRitche said:
Compared to the north the south were quite illiterate and much less educated.

That's why the gop hates public education. They want to dumb down america. trump's pick as the education secretary proves that.
Click to expand...

Our education system was a mess long before DeVos came along. Pretty much only one direction for it to go at this point.
 
Threedee said:
Our education system was a mess long before DeVos came along. Pretty much only one direction for it to go at this point.
Click to expand...

Yes it was a mess but why throw gasoline on a fire or throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Now maybe we're getting into conspiracies.

As far as I see it the book burners are running the libraries.
 
coolzone said:
Does that last sentence mean he is dead? (I hope so) If so, you should go and take a shit on his grave. As for the slave letter, it is as I was telling somebody else. Many slaves were better off as slaves than they were as freed people.
Click to expand...

I hope he is alive because he is always in incredible pain. Knowing that you hope so makes me think better of you, though. It gives you a little street cred.
 
CFM said:
Slavery still exists in the U.S. today. It's a self imposed form of it by blacks voting overwhelmingly for the Democratic party. Things have changed drastically on how blacks view slavery, too. People like Harriet Tubman worked to free slaves from its horrors. Today, if a black escapes it by opposing the Democratic party, other blacks chastise him for wanting to leave.
Click to expand...

That is such convoluted logic. but trumpies will eat it up like dung beetles in a tall shitpile.
 
UnkaRitche said:
That is such convoluted logic. but trumpies will eat it up like dung beetles in a tall shitpile.
Click to expand...

If blacks want to be self imposed slaves, that's their choice. Don't expect white people to come to the rescue this time and save you.
 
Threedee said:
If they didn't like being taxed, they could have mentioned it in their secession documents. Instead, all they did was harp-on about slavery.
Click to expand...

I've never read their secession documents. So I wouldn't know. Though I have heard that a lot of their bitching had to do with states rights. It could also well be that Southern states were offended by many in the North being against what was so vital to their economy as they structured it. Slavery. And figured that war was the best alternative. But there was another probable reason. Maybe one that worked along side the others. Many who want war will find a way to provoke it. If the North had done so, that could have been another reason for it. Then there were the acts by John Brown. That certainly didn't endear the South to the North.
 
the 4th reich still exists in south america.

Google "Psychiatrists, the men behind hitler". However, note that it was written by the church of scientology, noted for it's secret anti semitic ideology. It's interesting, though because it contains a lot of documents of the third reich.

Keep in mind that there are a lot of jewish psychiatrists in the world.

I would rate it as sophistic propaganda.
 
coolzone said:
I've never read their secession documents. So I wouldn't know. Though I have heard that a lot of their bitching had to do with states rights. It could also well be that Southern states were offended by many in the North being against what was so vital to their economy as they structured it. Slavery. And figured that war was the best alternative. But there was another probable reason. Maybe one that worked along side the others. Many who want war will find a way to provoke it. If the North had done so, that could have been another reason for it. Then there were the acts by John Brown. That certainly didn't endear the South to the North.
Click to expand...

They are worth reading over. I found a reference to St John Brown in one of them. The closest that the secession documents ever get to referencing the powers of the states is, of course, in referencing slavery, and its constitutionality.
 
UnkaRitche said:
the 4th reich still exists in south america.

Google "Psychiatrists, the men behind hitler". However, note that it was written by the church of scientology, noted for it's secret anti semitic ideology. It's interesting, though because it contains a lot of documents of the third reich.

Keep in mind that there are a lot of jewish psychiatrists in the world.

I would rate it as sophistic propaganda.
Click to expand...

There never has been a 4th Reich. Unfortunately. As for the nazi/racist hunter thing beside your avatar, it is always interesting when the hunter becomes the hunted. How does it feel. having "caught" you, I will expose you to some of the truth that comes with being caught. There is no such thing as a "racist." So in that regard, you were hunting the nonexistent. So I freed you from that wild goose chase.
The reason racists don't exist is because "race" doesn't exist. If it did, it would exist somewhere else in the animal kingdom. But it doesn't. Species does. Or at the very least, sub-species. Never sub-race. Like it or not, "race" is just a politically correct way of saying "species." So instead, you should be calling "racists" "specists."
I will show you a book cover. It shows forbidden knowledge. It is interesting that you could go outside or go diving and see the forbidden knowledge with your own eyes. The pictures on this book cover show a couple instances of specism in action.
TTU frontcover.jpg
 
Mott the Hoople said:
We’ve always been sensitive here in Ohio in regards to Confederates, those with brain injury and all mentally challenged people.
Click to expand...

To be fair, nobody really lives in Ohio. That is where they keep their stuff when they are off driving somewhere else. I bet if you went to the most remote part of Sri Lanka, you would see a car with Ohio plates.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top