The Importance of Social Conservatism as it Relates to the GOP

Boris The Animal said:
Oh don't get me wrong. If my daughter got knocked up, be rest assured the sperm donor would be beaten within an inch of his life!!!
Click to expand...

So no idea that the sperm donor should be shunned, just that you will beat him for sex with a willing participant.

You are exactly why people have moved away from the fundamentalist churches. The hypocrisy and the hatred are not what Jesus wanted preached.
 
Boris The Animal said:
I bet you isolationist whackjobs would change your tune whenever one of these maniacs decide to lob a nuke our way and level NYC, for example.
Click to expand...

I would do a dance. First it would eliminate New York which would include the UN. Second it would finally give us the reason we need to carpet bomb the camel fucking hummous eating mohamud pedophile loving sand negroes with a thousand nukes
 
WinterBorn said:
So no idea that the sperm donor should be shunned, just that you will beat him for sex with a willing participant.

You are exactly why people have moved away from the fundamentalist churches. The hypocrisy and the hatred are not what Jesus wanted preached.
Click to expand...

I guess you would just hand yours a coat hanger. Do you have a special one that has been handed down from generation to generation?
 
Boris The Animal said:
What we want to stop is the rampant sexual immorality.
Click to expand...

Then go see your shrink and find out why you’re sexually immoral and what you can do about it. How about letting other folks have the freedom to decide for themselves if they are sexually immoral and need help? What God died and left your sorry ass in charge of morality?

Because the sexual relationship must be confined to the monogamous heterosexual marriage. All else is deviance from the standard and wrong on all fronts.
Click to expand...

What fucking business is it of yours what agreeing adults do as long as nobody’s rights are violated?

Studies have proven that children born out of wedlock are more likely to have negative outcomes.
Click to expand...

Then maybe we need more homosexual marriages, homos don’t procreate. Seems you’re making a case against heterosexuality and its deviant unwed bastards, huh?
 
I Love America said:
I guess you would just hand yours a coat hanger. Do you have a special one that has been handed down from generation to generation?
Click to expand...

You talk about wanting to beat someone within an inch of their life because they slept with your willing daughter, and have the audacity to accuse me of a coathanger abortion? lol Too freakin funny.

No, if my daughter had come up pregnant she would have raised the child. You know, taken responsibility for her actions?
 
Boris The Animal said:
Just because there is are historical records of polygamy doesn't make it acceptable in God's view.
Click to expand...

On the contrary! According to Biblical scripture King Solomon was a biblically recorded Man Of God who had 1000 wives and 1500 concubine and only fell out of favor with God when he took a single Egyptian wife and began worshiping her graven idol gods.
 
Rana said:
No, but they are one of the steps, in the check and balances and this is a pretty conservative body right now and they decided it was constitutional.
Click to expand...

Which doesn't change that they can be grievously wrong. Simply saying, "because the SCOTUS said" is a logical fallacy, especially with evidence of truly horrible decisions of the past. An appeal to an extremely fragile (in the reality of the poor decisions of the past) authority.
 
WinterBorn said:
You talk about wanting to beat someone within an inch of their life because they slept with your willing daughter, and have the audacity to accuse me of a coathanger abortion? lol Too freakin funny.

No, if my daughter had come up pregnant she would have raised the child. You know, taken responsibility for her actions?
Click to expand...

Beating someone within an inch of their life for creating "a sacred life" is the epitome of Christian behavior, dontcha know?
 
Damocles said:
Which doesn't change that they can be grievously wrong. Simply saying, "because the SCOTUS said" is a logical fallacy, especially with evidence of truly horrible decisions of the past. An appeal to an extremely fragile (in the reality of the poor decisions of the past) authority.
Click to expand...

They aren't wrong in this case, sorry, you will have to take your sour grapes elsewhere.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top