Anyone here able to make sense of this one.yet it does not change it's truthfulness. by demanding this level of 'security', you keep low income people forever in a low income bracket. good for you.
Anyone here able to make sense of this one.yet it does not change it's truthfulness. by demanding this level of 'security', you keep low income people forever in a low income bracket. good for you.
Anyone here able to make sense of this one.
No ,the keeping low income people poor part. If you don't have the capital to start a business that includes regulations and licenses, then I'm sure not interested in using your unchecked service. Why would anyone.what do you not understand about people who do not have the money to start their own business being prevented from entering the business marketplace because you fucktards require hundreds of dollars in licenses before they can start their own business?
No ,the keeping low income people poor part. If you don't have the capital to start a business that includes regulations and licenses, then I'm sure not interested in using your unchecked service. Why would anyone.
where do you get this tripe.yet it does not change it's truthfulness. by demanding this level of 'security', you keep low income people forever in a low income bracket. good for you.
where do you get this tripe.
That's not true. Not true in the least. But we proclaim the worst intentions to our "opponents"
It's always a stupid idea to let business do what they want and expect them to be good guys and honor their fellow man. IT won't happen.
Hello cawacko,
OK, point taken. Make that:
"Some conservatives don't care what the regulation says.
They just want fewer of them. None, would be good for some, the way they talk.
Basically, they only want a government when they NEED one. Otherwise it should hide and not speak."
This does describe some people, and they sure aren't liberal.
Funny , wheres the reality in your statement that regulations make people poor. or make them stay poor. That's beyond reality that's just simply stupid.reality, as compared to the delusional utopia you seem to come from
You make a great point. No law or regulation the government has put in place during our 225 year history has ever become not needed or outdated. Never. We ought to have a constitutional amendment that once something is signed into law it can never be rescinded.
The whole post was sarcasm. It's essentially what the guy is arguing with his no deregulation stance
All good. I probably should have been more clear about it
Some good some bad so lets drop regulations and maybe??????Hello jbander,
Often the case. But not always. There are good and bad out there. Usually, some regulation is required to ensure a level playing field for business, and protect workers and consumers.
Not true. Many companies/industries like regulation because it can restrict competition.
Hello cawacko,
-deleted criticism of that idea-
Wrong. The OP is correct
I'll say.
then the ONLY thing you've accomplished [with regulations] is to ensure that the lower income people of this country REMAIN lower income people. congrats to you.
Are there actual political circles where folks sit around and say no regulation ever created in this country should be reduced or repealed?
Hello cawacko,
I don't know about other places and times but you did earlier in this thread. At least two of us did not see your sarcasm. Might help to add something like '/sarc' at the end of the post.
Unless we're talking past each other you just said the OP was correct so it seems you two believe it.
Hello cawacko,
I do agree with the OP.
As for deregulation, here's what Republicans like to do:
Cut safety and environmental regulations, keep the ones that help mega-corporations strongarm small business.