The Jesus story destroyed using the christian bible

Do you have a coherent answer?

That's the most honest answer I could possibly give you!
There are some who would instantly understand what I'm saying.
But to make it easy,before there was a physical universe with matter.
There was a pure Spiritual universe with just Spirits,we call Angels.
Until Lucifer attempted to overthrow
YHWH,causing "The Big Bang",creating the physical universe,and the third of the Angels who backed him,became what we call fallen Angels or Demons.
Also at that moment of "The Big Bang",the ArchAngel Michael was created.
So ,do I believe there are Angels?
Absolutely!
 
That's the most honest answer I could possibly give you!
There are some who would instantly understand what I'm saying.
But to make it easy,before there was a physical universe with matter.
There was a pure Spiritual universe with just Spirits,we call Angels.
Until Lucifer attempted to overthrow
YHWH,causing "The Big Bang",creating the physical universe,and the third of the Angels who backed him,became what we call fallen Angels or Demons.
Also at that moment of "The Big Bang",the ArchAngel Michael was created.
So ,do I believe there are Angels?
Absolutely!

Which one of the Demons is Owl? :)
 
how can one hate a mythical invention , plaid skirt wearer?


watch the video again

even you buy-bull book gosh spiels contradict one another

Still having a problem with cultures, now a religion, that's not your own, bigot?

The Gospels are eyewitness reports. If they agreed 100%, then they would be suspect.
 

Claim: Mithras was born of a virgin on December 25th, in a cave, attended by shepherds
Truth: Mithras was actually born out of solid rock, leaving a hole in the side of a mountain (presumably described as a “cave”). He was not born of a virgin (unless you consider the rock mountain to have been a virgin). His birth was celebrated on December 25th, but the first Christians knew this was not the true date of Christ’s birth anyway, and both Mithraic worshippers and the early Roman Church borrowed this celebration from earlier winter solstice celebrations. Shepherds are part of Mithraism, witnessing his birth and helping Mithras emerge from the rock, but interestingly, the shepherds exist in the birth chronology at a time when humans are not supposed to have been yet born. This, coupled with the fact the earliest version of this part of the Mithraic mythology emerges one hundred years after the appearance of the New Testament, infers it is far more likely this portion of Mithraism was borrowed from Christianity rather than the other way around.
Claim: Mithras was considered a great traveling teacher and master
Truth: There is nothing in the Mithraic tradition indicating he was a teacher of any kind, but he was could have been considered a master of sorts. This would not be unexpected of any deity, however. Most mythologies describe their gods in this way.

Claim: Mithras had 12 companions or disciples
Truth: There is no evidence for any of this in the traditions of Iran or Rome. It is possible the idea Mithras had 12 disciples is simply derived from murals in which Mithras is surrounded by twelve signs and personages of the Zodiac (two of whom are the moon and the sun). Even this imagery is post Christian, and, therefore, did not contribute to the imagery of Christianity (although it could certainly have borrowed from Christianity).

Claim: Mithras promised his followers immortality
Truth: While there is little evidence for this, it is certainly reasonable to think Mithras might have offered immortality, as this is not uncommon for any God of mythology.

Claim: Mithras performed miracles
Truth: Of course this is true, as this too was not uncommon for mythological characters.

Claim: Mithras sacrificed himself for world peace
Truth: There is little or no evidence this is true, although there is a story about Mithras slaying a threatening bull in a heroic deed. But that’s about as close as it gets.

Claim: Mithras was buried in a tomb and after three days rose again, and Mithras was celebrated each year at the time of His resurrection (later to become Easter)
Truth: There is nothing in the Mithraic tradition indicating he ever even died, let alone resurrected. Tertullian did write about Mithraic believers re-enacting resurrection scenes, but he wrote about this occurring well after New Testament times. Christianity could not, therefore, have borrowed from Mithraic traditions, but the opposite could certainly be true.

Claim: Mithras was called “the Good Shepherd”, and was identified with both the Lamb and the Lion
Truth: There is no evidence that Mithras was ever called “the Good Shepherd” or identified with a lamb, but since Mithras was a sun-god, there was an association with Leo (the House of the Sun in Babylonian astrology), so one might say he was associated with a Lion. But once again, all of this evidence is actually post New Testament; Mithraic believers may once again have borrowed this attribute from Christianity.

Claim: Mithras was considered to be the “Way, the Truth and the Light,” and the “Logos,” “Redeemer,” “Savior” and “Messiah.”
Truth: Based on the researched and known historic record of the Mithraic traditions, none of these terms has ever been applied to Mithras with the exception of “mediator”. But this term was used in a very different from how Christians used the term. Mithras was not the mediator between God and man but the mediator between the good and evil gods of Zoroaster.

Claim: Mithraic believers celebrated Sunday as Mithras’ sacred day (also known as the “Lord’s Day,”)
Truth: This tradition of celebrating Sunday is only true of Mithraic believers in Rome and it is a tradition that dates to post Christian times. Once again, it is more likely to have been borrowed from Christianity than the other way around.

Claim: Mithraic believers celebrated a Eucharist or “Lord’s Supper”
Truth: Followers of Mithras did not celebrate a Eucharist, but they did celebrate a fellowship meal regularly, just as did many other groups in the Roman world
http://coldcasechristianity.com/2014/is-jesus-simply-a-retelling-of-the-mithras-mythology/

poor guano.....
 
Horus....
Claim: Horus was conceived by a virgin mother named Meri, and had a stepfather named Seb (Joseph)
Truth: Horus was NOT conceived of a virgin. In fact, mural and textual evidence from Egypt indicates Isis (there is no evidence that “Meri” was ever part of her name) hovered over the erect penis (she created) of Osiris to conceive Horus. While she may have been a virgin before the conception, she utilized Osiris’ penis to conceive. She later had another son with Osiris as well. There is no evidence of three wise men as part of the Horus story at all. Seb was actually the “earth god”; He was not Horus’ earthly father. Seb is not the equivalent of Joseph and, in most cases, Seb is described as Osiris’ father.

Claim: Horus was born in a cave, his birth announced by an angel, heralded by a star and attended by shepherds.
Truth: There is no reference to a cave or manger in the Egyptian birth story of Horus. In fact, none of these details are present in the ancient Egyptian stories of Horus. Horus was born in a swamp. His birth was not heralded by an angel. There was no star.

Claim: Horus attended a special rite of passage at the age of twelve and there is no data on the child from the age of 12 to 30.
Truth: There is no continuous effort in the Horus mythology to account for all these years, so there are no real gaps in the chronology. Horus never taught in any temple at twelve (as did Jesus).

Claim: Horus was baptized in a river at the age of 30, and his baptizer was later beheaded.
Truth: Horus was never baptized. While conspiracy theorists often point to “Anup the Baptizer” (claiming he was later beheaded), there is no such person in Horus’ story.

Claim: Horus had 12 disciples.
Truth: Horus had only four disciples (called ‘Heru-Shemsu’), but at some point in his story there is reference to sixteen followers and a group of unnumbered followers who join Horus in battle (called ‘mesnui’).

Claim: Horus performed miracles, exorcized demons, raised someone from the dead, and walked on water.
Truth: Horus certainly performed miracles (he was, after all, described as a god). But there was no mention of exorcizing demons, raising people from the dead or walking on water.

Claim: Horus was called “Iusa”, the “ever-becoming son” and the “Holy Child”.
Truth: No one in Egyptian history was ever called “Iusa” (the word does not exist) nor was anyone called “Holy Child”.

Claim: Horus delivered a “Sermon on the Mount”, and his followers recounted his sayings. He was transfigured on the Mount.
Truth: Horus never delivered a “Sermon on the Mount”, nor was he transfigured.

Claim: Horus was crucified between two thieves, buried for three days in a tomb, and was resurrected.
Truth: Horus is not reported to have died at all in the vast majority of Egyptian narratives. There is also no crucifixion story. Instead, Horus is usually described as eventually merging with Re (the Sun god) after which he “dies” and is “reborn” every day as the sun rises. There is a parallel account describing Horus’ death and detailing how he was cast in pieces into the water, later fished out by a crocodile at Isis’ request.

Claim: Horus was called “Way”, “the Truth the Light”, “Messiah”, “God’s Anointed Son”, “Son of Man”, “Good Shepherd”, “Lamb of God”, “Word made flesh”, “Word of Truth”, “the KRST” or “Anointed One”.
Truth: None of these titles are in Egyptian history, but Horus is called by several names you might expect for any god in mythology: “Great God”, “Chief of the Powers”, “Master of Heaven”, and “Avenger of His Father”. Horus was not called “the Krst”. This word in Egyptian means “burial” (it wasn’t a title at all).

Claim: Horus was “the Fisher” and was associated with the Fish, Lamb and Lion.
Truth: Some of conspiracy theorists associate Horus with fish (by virtue of the fact that Horus was a fish in some portion of the ancient narrative), but there is no evidence Horus was ever called a “fisher” or was ever associated with the Lion or the Lamb.

Claim: Horus came to fulfill the Law, and was supposed to reign one thousand years.
Truth: There was no Egyptian “law” for Horus to fulfill, and there is no mention of a thousand year reign in Egyptian mythology.
http://coldcasechristianity.com/2017/is-jesus-simply-a-retelling-of-the-horus-myth/
poor guano.....
 
Which one of the Demons is Owl? :)

stock-photo-a-scary-demon-woman-with-big-sharp-teeth-232130074.jpg
 
Attis?
How much truth is there to these claims? Not a lot of details are available regarding Attis, but most sources do not mention any of these similarities and the only ones that do mention them postdate the time of Jesus by several centuries and were written by Christian authors - meaning that any similarity to Christianity may have been due to the religion being interpreted through a Christian lens. Also, if the actual myth is examined, it bears little resemblance to the Gospel narrative.

According to one version of the myth, Attis was made high priest by Cybele and one of the requirements was chastity on the part of Attis. When he broke this vow of faithfulness to her with a nymph, she caused him to go insane and he eventually castrated himself. After he regained his senses, he committed suicide and she turned him into a tree which became sacred to her.
https://www.ancient-origins.net/myths-legends-europe/pagan-attis-and-christian-jesus-spurious-connection-009634

if you are an enraged atheist, committing suicide and turning into a tree is just like being crucified on a cross.......poor guano....
 
Dionysus

Though Zeus begged her not to ask this, she persisted and he agreed. Therefore, he came to her wreathed in bolts of lightning; mortals, however, could not look upon an undisguised god without dying, and she perished in the ensuing blaze. Zeus rescued the unborn Dionysus by sewing him into his thigh. A few months later, Dionysus was born on Mount Pramnos in the island of Ikaria, where Zeus went to release the now-fully-grown baby from his thigh. In this version, Dionysus is borne by two "mothers" (Semele and Zeus) before his birth, hence the epithet dimētōr (of two mothers) associated with his being "twice-born".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dionysus
gosh, just like the nativity.....poor uninformed guano....
 
Now that humanity has access to to history and sociology at their fingertips , truth is readily available to matters of the roots of belief systems
 
You are a fool. People have been trying to discredit the Bible for 2000 years. No one has succeeded. In fact, many parts of Scripture once thought to be myths have been proven true through archeology. Not once. Not twice. Not three times, but many times. Over and over again, Scripture has been proven to be accurate in everything it says. They even found what's left of Sodom and Gamorrah. And guess what? They were destroyed by fire and brimstone. Just like the Bible said.


education is your friend
 


Several books in Christian Bibles were demonstrably not written by their alleged authors. Many of these books are now designated the “Pseudepigrapha” or “Apocrypha.” The term pseudepigrapha means generally “falsely written,” and the term apocrypha means “secret” or, more suspiciously, “hidden.” How did such seemingly spurious writings become part of the biblical canon? In this lecture, Prof. Wright will explain how these books came into being and how they became canonical. This fresh look at these “false,” “secret,” or “hidden” books will reveal the great diversity that existed in earliest Judaism and Christianity.

J. Edward Wright is Professor of Hebrew Bible and Early Judaism and has served as the Director of the Arizona Center for Judaic Studies at The University of Arizona since 2000. Wright received his Ph.D. from Brandeis University and did additional graduate study at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Harvard Divinity School.
 
That's the most honest answer I could possibly give you!
There are some who would instantly understand what I'm saying.
But to make it easy,before there was a physical universe with matter.
There was a pure Spiritual universe with just Spirits,we call Angels.
Until Lucifer attempted to overthrow
YHWH,causing "The Big Bang",creating the physical universe,and the third of the Angels who backed him,became what we call fallen Angels or Demons.
Also at that moment of "The Big Bang",the ArchAngel Michael was created.
So ,do I believe there are Angels?
Absolutely!

Who told you all that garbage?
 
Still having a problem with cultures, now a religion, that's not your own, bigot?

The Gospels are eyewitness reports. If they agreed 100%, then they would be suspect.

Joseph Smith had eyewitness accounts, too. So, you must believe in his golden tablets.
 
You are a fool. People have been trying to discredit the Bible for 2000 years. No one has succeeded. In fact, many parts of Scripture once thought to be myths have been proven true through archeology. Not once. Not twice. Not three times, but many times. Over and over again, Scripture has been proven to be accurate in everything it says. They even found what's left of Sodom and Gamorrah. And guess what? They were destroyed by fire and brimstone. Just like the Bible said.

People have been trying to discredit the Bible for more than 2000 years...

...and most have succeeded.

But stick with your mythology. It helps get you past the graveyard...although whistling a happy tune works also.
 
That's the most honest answer I could possibly give you!
There are some who would instantly understand what I'm saying.
But to make it easy,before there was a physical universe with matter.
There was a pure Spiritual universe with just Spirits,we call Angels.
Until Lucifer attempted to overthrow
YHWH,causing "The Big Bang",creating the physical universe,and the third of the Angels who backed him,became what we call fallen Angels or Demons.
Also at that moment of "The Big Bang",the ArchAngel Michael was created.
So ,do I believe there are Angels?
Absolutely!

So...your blind guess is that the Bible is the word of a god...

...and a further blind guess is that "angels" exist.

Why do you word that as, "I believe?"
 
Back
Top