IBDaMann
Well-known member
... after you tell me which ones have a heartbeat, Terry.
The Question that Makes Cowards out of Leftists
- Thread starter IBDaMann
- Start date
IBDaMann
Well-known member
guno, here's a quiz on Jewish law. Let's see if you can pass.
QUESTION 1. Does Jewish law recognize that having human DNA is conclusive proof of being human?
QUESTION 2. Does Jewish law recognize that after 40 days of gestation, and a heartbeat develops, that the fetus is alive?
QUESTION 3. Does Jewish law permit the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die?
You don't know anything about Jewish law, do you?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Do you ever have thoughts of harming yourself or others, Sybil?NO ANSWERS FROM ME
I NEVER ANSWER QUESTIONS
A PSYCHO I AM
We don’t. Wait no more.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
He ignores all intelligent answers.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You do. It makes you a shitty person. Governments that throw homosexuals off roofs of tall buildings are comprised of people like you. Jirgas that have women stoned to death at the husbands' request are comprised of people like you. People like you justify throwing Jews into ovens by claiming that they are not living humans. You would applaud a woman putting a contract out on the life of another living human and tell yourself that the hit is justified because the living human is young enough.
Can you think of anyone shittier?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
QED
I reject your definition of a living human being. You lose. Your emotionally wrought post did make me laugh through. Poor baby.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Naturally I wasn't including you. I wasn't referring to people actually covered in their own feces because the nurses haven't begun to clean up the "accident."
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I know you do. You reject the global medical community's axiom "where there is a heartbeat, there is life." You reject the idea that human DNA precludes pertinence to any other species. You reject fundamental principles that are otherwise universally accepted because you are a shitty person who is desperate to justify the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die.
You are too dishonest to admit that you can't think of anyone shittier than yourself.
I know you do. You reject the global medical community's axiom "where there is a heartbeat, there is life." You reject the idea that human DNA precludes pertinence to any other species. You reject fundamental principles that are otherwise universally accepted because you are a shitty person who is desperate to justify the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die.
You are too dishonest to admit that you can't think of anyone shittier than yourself.
False. You are a liar. That is not the accepted definition among the global medical community. Your casual relationship with the truth is obvious. Your feeble attempt at an emotional appeal makes you look like a fucking clown.
Waaaaaa!!! You suck!!!!
Great debate style you’ve got there chump. Your cute little pictures sure do bolster your argument.
ROTFLMFAO!!!
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You would be the liar in this discussion.
You're pivoting, liar. "Definition" is not the correct word, liar. The axiom followed by the global medical community is that if there is a heartbeat, there is life. All medical personnel first check non-responsive people for a pulse. All doctors check blood pressure and pulse. You have no wiggle room here. Your assertion that there are dead creatures that nonetheless have beating hearts is absurd and only underscores your desperation to justify killing living humans. Just admit it, you're shitty that way.
Are you seriously going to claim that human DNA is somehow found in other species? Let me know who you fool.
Great debate style you’ve got there chump. You insist that those with human DNA and a beating heart are somehow not living humans because ... well, because you were ordered to insist that they aren't alive and human by your political slave masters who do your thinking for you.
ROTFLMFAOUICFB!
You would be the liar in this discussion.
You're pivoting, liar. "Definition" is not the correct word, liar. The axiom followed by the global medical community is that if there is a heartbeat, there is life. All medical personnel first check non-responsive people for a pulse. All doctors check blood pressure and pulse. You have no wiggle room here. Your assertion that there are dead creatures that nonetheless have beating hearts is absurd and only underscores your desperation to justify killing living humans. Just admit it, you're shitty that way.
Are you seriously going to claim that human DNA is somehow found in other species? Let me know who you fool.
Great debate style you’ve got there chump. You insist that those with human DNA and a beating heart are somehow not living humans because ... well, because you were ordered to insist that they aren't alive and human by your political slave masters who do your thinking for you.
ROTFLMFAOUICFB!
An axiom is a catch phrase. It isn’t ‘accepted’ as canon by anyone but you. I am not ‘ordered’ to do anything. My opinions are my own. Does this crying crocodile tears, babbling like an idiot and bullying work in real life? Cute little pictures though.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
An axiom is that which is always true, and is therefore universally accepted. Some examples:
* If there is a heartbeat, there is life.
* having human DNA means it's human
Nope. Your opinions are others' political agendas. You don't have any opinions that aren't handed to you for regurgitation.
Your opinions are others political agenda.
Mine are my own. An axiom has no legal or scientific force. It means nothing. You aren't a serious person. You are a troll..
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You flatter me with your attempts to mimic me, but axioms are simply statements that are necessarily true and are not my opinion. Another example "breathing is good" is universally accepted and is not merely my opinion.
What you will notice is that I am free and fully capable of acknowledging all axioms because I am not a shitty person who is desperate to justify the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die.
I suppose that when your slave-masters tell you to advocate for the deaths of the following living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die, you will fall right in line and OBEY because you are shitty that way:
Conart, what if the living human being killed hasn't committed any crime but disagrees with you politically? That's sufficient justification for killing that living human, right? Take me, for example, I disagree with you politically, so killing me would be totally justified, right?
Declaration fallacy. Obviously I am very serious about my opposition to the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die ... and I fully understand your distaste for people like me who threaten to hinder you from satisfying your blood-thirst. I don't pretend to know why you wish death upon children but you do, and I oppose you on every one of those fronts.
You're a shitty person who refers to those who defend the lives of living humans as "trolls". At least we agree that, to the best of our combined knowledge, we can't think of anyone shittier.
You flatter me with your attempts to mimic me, but axioms are simply statements that are necessarily true and are not my opinion. Another example "breathing is good" is universally accepted and is not merely my opinion.
What you will notice is that I am free and fully capable of acknowledging all axioms because I am not a shitty person who is desperate to justify the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die.
I suppose that when your slave-masters tell you to advocate for the deaths of the following living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die, you will fall right in line and OBEY because you are shitty that way:
Conart, what if the living human being killed hasn't committed any crime but disagrees with you politically? That's sufficient justification for killing that living human, right? Take me, for example, I disagree with you politically, so killing me would be totally justified, right?
Declaration fallacy. Obviously I am very serious about my opposition to the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die ... and I fully understand your distaste for people like me who threaten to hinder you from satisfying your blood-thirst. I don't pretend to know why you wish death upon children but you do, and I oppose you on every one of those fronts.
You're a shitty person who refers to those who defend the lives of living humans as "trolls". At least we agree that, to the best of our combined knowledge, we can't think of anyone shittier.
Wow are you pathetic. I see you channeled one of your socks there. Ooops.
Boohoohoo, you think I'm a shitty person. I'm SO crushed. Why exactly are you addicted to death porn. Do you jack off to those pictures? Never mind, of course you do. Try to clean up your mess.
ROTFLMFAO!!!!
IBDaMann
Well-known member
So, no answers to any of my totally legitimate questions? I see. You aren't allowed to answer. I get it.
Aren’t you going to post more of your death porn pictures? I’ll bet you have them for every jerk off occasion. Which one gets you off the most? Your pictures of kids getting shot in the head? Is that what you go with if you’ve only got a minute?
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Rana isn't awake yet, he doesn't know what to say.