The Relentless Feminist War Against Men in America.

reX. The Electric Lion.

To Sun Devil. Thank You for Answering me.

You are Correct - Adultery is illegal in Islam and - punishable with death. But the MEN in ISLAMIC Doctrine and Islamic Teaching - are Allowed to Hire Women for any amount of time. an Hour or two, A Day or Two or a Month, Just to have a Sexual eXchange for a SUM of Money or a Gift. .

This is Adultery in the Bible and If they are Caught in the USA doing that. They Could Be Committing A CRIME.

Because if the Muslim MAN is LEGALLY Married to a Woman and then Hires a Muslim Woman for this sexual Encounter, He CAN NOT Legally Marry Her. So he Is committing adultery . by the LAWs - OF THE UNITED STATES. - And Many Other Countries.

Polygamy is not LEGAL in the USA,... An American Man Can Have sex with 40 women a week and have Homosexual seX with 40 Men As well all in the Same WEEK. BUT if He Marries More than One Partner, He is Breaking the LAW. and To HIRE another Woman, jUST For seX for a Period of Time. IS Called ADULTERY. and Prostitution.

You can CALL it What You Would Like. LOOKING through the Eyes of ISLAMIC Law. But YES Adultery and Prostitution is Condoned, Practiced and Sanctioned in ISLAM.

. But *( BY The Biblical and American LAWs and Standards... it is NOT, - OK. Please Re Read the Facts and Support the Truth,

Men are not Killed or Punished in ISLAM. for Having a Few Hours of a sexual FLING with another Islamic Woman, Who has been Paid Money or Gifts,./ They Call this Marriage. Even if the Woman Has been with 100 Other Men . She Can DIVORSE and Re- Mary Forever.

If the HUSBAND decides to Keep her for a few more Hours, Days or Months. She Can be PINISHED or Killed for Going to another Customer. and Committing Islamic Adultery !
 
philly rabbit said:
Hate is a very powerful word. Political incorrectness has got nothing to do with hate nor does waving around a sexist card at anyone revealing the radical feminist agenda or calling that person a hater of women and especially whining again about being a victim.

Especially the victim card.
Click to expand...

None of the feminist I know are victims, in fact the opposite, they are activist and have been brave enough to stand up to people with small minds who put limitation on women with their "roles" that men and women should play.

Feminist have told the orthodox that women no longer have to play by the old rules. We are not chattel. We are your peers.

I know it frightens a lot of older folks, but thank goodness, the younger people are being raised with these new fangled ideas and they are better for it. The world is growing better for it.
 
Last edited:
philly rabbit said:
Rana knows how to play the game.

She's a gold star mother who bakes cookies for the girl scouts when it's expedite to be such, she's a helpless female victim of a woman hating redneck when it's politically expedite to be so, but in truth, she's a radical leftist feminist with an anti male agenda who's no different than the other two here.
Click to expand...

I live to be happy, you should try it sometime.

Yes, my hatred of men is so radical that not one male on this board likes me. ;)
 
Sardonic said:
None of the feminist I know are victims, in fact the opposite, they are activist and have been brave enough to stand up to people with small minds who put limitation on women with their "roles" that men and women should play.

Feminist have told the orthodox that women no longer have to play by the old rules. We are not chattel. We are your peers.

I know it frightens a lot of older folks, but thank goodness, the younger people are being raised with these new tangled ideas and they are better for it. The world is growing better for it.
Click to expand...

You believe that men don't and shouldn't have reproduction rights. You also believe that all children should be planned children. Those are two undeniable facts that you have refused to even dispute because they are - true undeniable facts.

And you are no different, absolutely no different than evince and Darla because the three of you detest men and want them to be as insignificant as possible within the country's social structure and the three of you wholly support queer lesbians marrying each other because men no longer are viable within the family structure with women now holding all the pro creation cards only.
 
Sardonic said:
I live to be happy, you should try it sometime.

Yes, my hatred of men is so radical that not one male on this board likes me. ;)
Click to expand...

And no one male on this board has bothered to defend you because they know no matter what they think of me that I am right about this.

...... except that idiot over in England with his: I'm such a hater fluff because he didn't know what else to say.
 
philly rabbit said:
And no one male on this board has bothered to defend you because they know no matter what they think of me that I am right about this.

...... except that idiot over in England with his: I'm such a hater fluff because he didn't know what else to say.
Click to expand...


In a word...NO.

No males on this board have come to defend Sardonic because it's common knowledge amongst all but the most petty, vitriol spewing partisans that she's kicked your partisan ass too many times to count now, and if needed she can do so anytime she chooses.

ROTFLMAO!
 
philly rabbit said:
And no one male on this board has bothered to defend you because they know no matter what they think of me that I am right about this.

...... except that idiot over in England with his: I'm such a hater fluff because he didn't know what else to say.
Click to expand...


Well, I think sardonic is usually about right. I didn't know there were any English in this discussion, but it is a bit tedious to read it all, fair play, and I have a lot of weirdoes on 'ignore'..
 
christiefan915 said:
I guess nothing's "TMI" for you. Then again you're the guy whose snout's been in Bill Clinton's sex life since 1992.
Click to expand...
You didn't answer the question. Do you really think that knowing that a child was unplanned is the same as knowing about the sex lives of the parents?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
In a word...NO.

No males on this board have come to defend Sardonic because it's common knowledge amongst all but the most petty, vitriol spewing partisans that she's kicked your partisan ass too many times to count now, and if needed she can do so anytime she chooses.

ROTFLMAO!
Click to expand...

I said men, not guitar plucking dopers.
 
iolo said:
Well, I think sardonic is usually about right. I didn't know there were any English in this discussion, but it is a bit tedious to read it all, fair play, and I have a lot of weirdoes on 'ignore'..
Click to expand...

Rana doesn't think that men should have any reproductive rights and that all children should be planned.

And I'm yet to hear your gold star mother challenge any aspect of these two condemning statements because Rana cannot deny either.

Rana wants to be an eternal whiner and a victim of all no good men and Rana needs predator male animals dominate in society to remain such.
 
Sardonic said:
Conquer? lol what a Neanderthal!
Click to expand...

Notice I didn't say conquer women, but conquer in general, it's in our DNA, I will tell you I think the problem we have in America today is to many women in politics, sue me. But I also believe it's Gods way of saying look, Eve made poor decisions and you paid for it, now you are making women decision makers, and you are paying for it. I don't care if you don't like that I have said this so save yourself some time.
 
philly rabbit said:
Rana doesn't think that men should have any reproductive rights and that all children should be planned.

And I'm yet to hear your gold star mother challenge any aspect of these two condemning statements because Rana cannot deny either.

Rana wants to be an eternal whiner and a victim of all no good men and Rana needs predator male animals dominate in society to remain such.
Click to expand...

Sorry - don't understand. Women carry unborn babies, and it seems sensible that all children should be wanted, both points seeming rather relevant. Fathers have rights equivalent to their contributions, I reckon. Do you disagree?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top