The Safety and Efficacy of Vaccines

[Scott]

Yeah, the mainstream media has basically become the stenographers of deep state propaganda, itself beholden to various corporate interests. Fortunately, there is still alternative media sources that do talk about these things.

They are shills for UTOPIA.

And they will say anything.

I think the majority of mainstream reporters have their limits, but some may say whatever their corporate/government masters wish for the right price.

 

[Hawkeye10]

I think the majority of mainstream reporters have their limits, but some may say whatever their corporate/government masters wish for the right price.

You are wildly overly optimistic,

 

[Hawkeye10]

Those who choose to live in fantasy will get what they deserve.

"I have never seen anyone ever get away with anything"
The Great Jordan Peterson

 

[Hawkeye10]

I think that JP quote is right....I am deep into Party Mode.

 

[Scott]

You are wildly overly optimistic,

I don't see my view as particularly optimistic . But I do believe that even your average corporate shill journalist has limits as to what they will say- shading the truth about the evidence concerning vaccine injuries and deaths or not reporting it, sure, but overtly lying about the evidence could potentially land them in trouble further down the line. Corporate news has no problem with firing journalists if claims they make are shown to be untrue if it becomes politically inconvenient for them, and I think most corporate journalists are aware of this.

 

[Hawkeye10]

I don't see my view as particularly optimistic . But I do believe that even your average corporate shill journalist has limits as to what they will say- shading the truth about the evidence concerning vaccine injuries and deaths or not reporting it, sure, but overtly lying about the evidence could potentially land them in trouble further down the line. Corporate news has no problem with firing journalists if claims they make are shown to be untrue if it becomes politically inconvenient for them, and I think most corporate journalists are aware of this.

They work for UTOPIA not us, and NO there is no limit on that.

Do you pay any attention at all?

 

[Hawkeye10]

I don't see my view as particularly optimistic . But I do believe that even your average corporate shill journalist has limits as to what they will say- shading the truth about the evidence concerning vaccine injuries and deaths or not reporting it, sure, but overtly lying about the evidence could potentially land them in trouble further down the line. Corporate news has no problem with firing journalists if claims they make are shown to be untrue if it becomes politically inconvenient for them, and I think most corporate journalists are aware of this.

They are shooting for UTOPIA, their shit quality Heaven.....NO there is no limit you dope.

 

[Hawkeye10]

They will kill as many as they must.

 

[Scott]

They work for UTOPIA not us, and NO there is no limit on that.

What is this UTOPIA you speak of?

 

[Hawkeye10]

What is this UTOPIA you speak of?

The place were the miserable WOKE will be happy.

 

[Scott]

The place were the miserable WOKE will be happy.

I see.

 

[Hawkeye10]

I see.

I doubt it.

 

[Concart]

Why do you believe that?



Insulting someone's beliefs is easy, supporting your own is what's hard.



I believe it wasn't a virus, yes, due to the lack of evidence that viruses exist. If you're interested in debating that subject, I've made thread for it here:
Settling the Biological Virus Debate | justplainpolitics.com

As to what causes smallpox outbreaks, I strongly suspect toxins, but that's as far as I'll go there. I found a video that gets into evidence that the definition of smallpox has always been ambiguous and has frequently been confused with measles and chicken pox, suggesting that smallpox was never eradicated, so much as reclassified as other diseases. It's here:

The smallpox, plague & lepracy hoax + a farewell to virology and contagion theory ft Dr Mark Bailey | Goyimtv.com




Name any article I've ever posted that doesn't agree with some point I'm making.



Based on the video linked to above, I no longer believe that smallpox has been eliminated at all, just reclassified.



I have never claimed that people haven't suffered from smallpox or that cows haven't suffered from cowpox. The issue is what is causing these diseases. As to alleged immunity to these alleged viruses, you'd need to show your evidence that these any virus exists before I'd be interested in continuing that discussion.

You are insane.

 

[Scott]

Why do you believe that?

Insulting someone's beliefs is easy, supporting your own is what's hard.

I believe it wasn't a virus, yes, due to the lack of evidence that viruses exist. If you're interested in debating that subject, I've made thread for it here:
Settling the Biological Virus Debate | justplainpolitics.com

As to what causes smallpox outbreaks, I strongly suspect toxins, but that's as far as I'll go there. I found a video that gets into evidence that the definition of smallpox has always been ambiguous and has frequently been confused with measles and chicken pox, suggesting that smallpox was never eradicated, so much as reclassified as other diseases. It's here:

The smallpox, plague & lepracy hoax + a farewell to virology and contagion theory ft Dr Mark Bailey | Goyimtv.com

Name any article I've ever posted that doesn't agree with some point I'm making.

Based on the video linked to above, I no longer believe that smallpox has been eliminated at all, just reclassified.

I have never claimed that people haven't suffered from smallpox or that cows haven't suffered from cowpox. The issue is what is causing these diseases. As to alleged immunity to these alleged viruses, you'd need to show your evidence that these any virus exists before I'd be interested in continuing that discussion.

You are insane.

I write you a long post with various points and links. Your response is an ad hominem attack, full stop. Someone clearly isn't holding up their share of the discussion.

 

[Concart]

I write you a long post with various points and links. Your response is an ad hominem attack, full stop. Someone clearly isn't holding up their share of the discussion.

We have no framework for a discussion. Viruses exist. Period, end of story. To believe otherwise is to be either remarkably stupid or completely insane. I chose the latter. There is no point in discussion when a basic fact informing that discussion can’t be agreed upon. You didn’t answer my questions because you couldn’t. Those FACTS make your position impossible to support but you continue with it anyway. Been there done that. Carry on with your crazy. I think I’ll pass.

https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/histor...nation began,used to protect against smallpox.

That article supports all of what I said. I expect you simply impugn the source. Where did you get your medical degree again?

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

We have no framework for a discussion. Viruses exist. Period, end of story. To believe otherwise is to be either remarkably stupid or completely insane. I chose the latter. There is no point in discussion when a basic fact informing that discussion can’t be agreed upon. You didn’t answer my questions because you couldn’t. Those FACTS make your position impossible to support but you continue with it anyway. Been there done that. Carry on with your crazy. I think I’ll pass.

https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/histor...nation began,used to protect against smallpox.

That article supports all of what I said. I expect you simply impugn the source. Where did you get your medical degree again?

ad hominem attacks are not valid argumentation, yet it's all you want and do.

 

[Concart]

This message is hidden because AssHatZombie is on your ignore list.

I guess I should remind you once in a while that I'm not listening to your fucking insane conspiracy theory bullshit. You're welcome.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

ad hominem attacks are not valid argumentation, yet it's all you want and do.

Let everyone know when you figure out what argumentum ad hominem ACTUALLY means. (Hint: it isn't just an insult.)

Wow, you guys like to act like you have all this education but you keep showing up how little you actually have! It's hilarious to see you thrash around trying to sound all "intelleckshul".

Go back to the trailer, mouthbreather.

 

[Concart]

Let everyone know when you figure out what argumentum ad hominem ACTUALLY means. (Hint: it isn't just an insult.)

Wow, you guys like to act like you have all this education but you keep showing up how little you actually have! It's hilarious to see you thrash around trying to sound all "intelleckshul".

Go back to the trailer, mouthbreather.

This. If you post insane things, calling you insane is not an adhom. Perhaps I could say instead that his argument was insane, but brevity is the soul of wit.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Let everyone know when you figure out what argumentum ad hominem ACTUALLY means. (Hint: it isn't just an insult.)

Wow, you guys like to act like you have all this education but you keep showing up how little you actually have! It's hilarious to see you thrash around trying to sound all "intelleckshul".

Go back to the trailer, mouthbreather.

it means saying someone is correct just because of some authority they hold.

that's what you do with fauci.

other medical professional with equal degrees disagree with him.

the vaccine was never tested for transmission.

your whole worldview is an appeal to authority fallacy.