Are you implying that stay at home moms are less educated?
Most aren't. There are exceptions. I know a real ignorant hick, high school dropout at 16, later got a ged, and though education isn't everything, she is the living stereotype. She's married to a low-earner, and they're poor, but she's a stay at home mom.
But typically, this is a high-falutin debate taking place between educated women on both ends of this. Typically, educated women marry educated men, and in order to have the choice to be a stay at home mom, you normally would have to be married to a high earner, ie; a highly educated man.
Also typically, uneducated women marry uneducated men, both are low earners and both must work.
That is why this new debate, which is really the old debate brought about by Betty Friedan's "The Feminine Mystique" is so alienating to so many women, just as it was during second wave feminism.
You can't have this debate without bringing class into it, and I'd argue, without race as well, and during second wave feminism it took the black feminist intellectuals to bring both those things into it.
Otherwise what you are doing is having an arguement between the top percentile, representative of no one other than themselves, and thus excluding the majority of women in this country.
Then you throw men into the mix, with them molding their idea of the perfect woman, whatever that might be, the driven accomplished, brilliant career woman, or the mother earth type, (and a lot of that is about their mothers) and you really have nothing except a bunch of bullshit.