The Suck Zone - Need a science forum

Perry Phimosis said:
Correct. Most of those that are not particularly "controversial" (ie largely misunderstood by the scientific illiterates on the board) it won't get much traction, though.

I like to see the depth of scientific ignorance of many of our posters here on JPP. It is an inspiration to push for actual scientific education improvement in the US.
Click to expand...

You can search until the cows come home, but you would be hard pressed to find MAGAs starting threads about astronomy, biochemistry, physics, genetics.

When one's mind is consumed with toxic grievances about all the blacks, Jews, and feminazis who supposedly screwed your life over, there is not much mental energy or motivation left for physics, maths, and chemistry.

That's why the U.S. scientific community is increasingly going to be stocked and replenished by liberals, Jews, and immigrants. I would be very surprised if more than a small minority of CERN or LLNL researchers are MAGAs.
 
AssHatZombie said:
what do scientists say is the human carrying capacity of the planet?
Click to expand...
It depends upon energy and food/water supplies.

Theoretically, the population density of cities can be spread out across the planet, including underground and under the sea.

Using a moderate 20,000 people per KM X Earth's 510M sq KM surface area = 10,200,000,000,000 people. The problem isn't making people but how to feed them. Notice that when Bush signed the biofuel legislation and the US began burning its corn for fuel, people in other nations began starving more than before. Currently, the human population is limited by resources.

https://www.universetoday.com/25756/surface-area-of-the-earth/
And in the era of modern astronomy, improvements in instrumentation, methodology, and the ability to see Earth from space have certainly helped. According to modern estimates, the surface area of the Earth is approximately 510 million square km (5.1 x 108 km2) or 196,900,000 square miles. Determining this was not only a matter of ascertaining Earth’s dimensions, but also its proper shape.
Click to expand...
Ku3zYNM5pqP1MxFZ9Ro91PDPKqJqWNzGabSrn1eC0Ww.png
 
Cypress said:
Genuine interest in science and the maths is limited to about six people here, unless there is a partisan political angle to be exploited, aka evolution and climate science.

On a tangent, I got the impression William Jefferson Clinton and Jimmy Carter were our most scientifically literate presidents.
Click to expand...

Dutch Uncle said:
It depends upon energy and food/water supplies.

Theoretically, the population density of cities can be spread out across the planet, including underground and under the sea.

Using a moderate 20,000 people per KM X Earth's 510M sq KM surface area = 10,200,000,000,000 people. The problem isn't making people but how to feed them. Notice that when Bush signed the biofuel legislation and the US began burning its corn for fuel, people in other nations began starving more than before. Currently, the human population is limited by resources.

https://www.universetoday.com/25756/surface-area-of-the-earth/

Ku3zYNM5pqP1MxFZ9Ro91PDPKqJqWNzGabSrn1eC0Ww.png
Click to expand...



food is a renewable resource.

the only real problem is murderous psychotics feeling entitle to kill everybody.

THE WORLD ECONOIC FORUM, the military industrial complex and big pharma.
 
AssHatZombie said:
the only real problem is murderous psychotics feeling entitle to kill everybody.
Click to expand...
Like the WSEs attacking the Capitol? I agree.

Better mental healthcare would be necessary. Including screening fetuses for genetic diseases, both physical and mental, and correcting the problem or terminating the fetus.

5dx5qq.gif
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Like the WSEs attacking the Capitol? I agree.

Better mental healthcare would be necessary. Including screening fetuses for genetic diseases, both physical and mental, and correcting the problem or terminating the fetus.

5dx5qq.gif
Click to expand...

no.

not like that at all.

apparently you're an imbecile.
:truestory:
 
Anti-co2 is an insane plan to harm earths overall ecology.

co2 is crucial for all plant life.

it's not a pollutant.

anti co2 policy is an attack on the backbone of earth's ecosystem, our plants.

environmentalism as a banker produced totalitarian mass death scenario is insane.

:truestory:

The Similarities Between ESG and Fascism Are Scary
https://www.newgeography.com › content › 007352-the-similarities-between-esg-and-fascism-are-scary
Jul 19, 2022As Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) divesting in fossil fuels progresses, by many of the masters of the financial universe, the short memories of petrochemicals' golden goose contributions to societies are leading the world to an era of Extreme Shortages Guaranteed (ESG) like we had in the decarbonized world in the 1800's!. Allowing banks and investment giants like BlackRock, led ...
The Similarities Between ESG And Fascism Are Scary
https://blog.heartland.org › 2022 › 02 › the-similarities-between-esg-and-fascism-are-scary
Feb 14, 2022As Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) divesting in fossil fuels progresses, by many of the masters of the financial universe, the short memories of petrochemicals' golden goose contributions to societies are leading the world to an era of Extreme Shortages Guaranteed (ESG) like we had in the decarbonized world in the 1800's!
The Similarities Between ESG and Fascism Are Scary - Heartland Daily News
https://heartlanddailynews.com › 2022 › 03 › the-similarities-between-esg-and-fascism-are-scary
Mar 1, 2022Fascism has no new ideas, and not even its partisans really believe it can accomplish what it sets out to do. The similarities between the effects of ESG divesting objectives and fascism are truly frightening. E fforts to end the use of crude oil would pose a greater threat to civilization, than climate change itself.
The Similarities Between ESG And Fascism Are Scary - OpEd
https://www.eurasiareview.com › 14022022-the-similarities-between-esg-and-fascism-are-scary-oped
Feb 14, 2022As Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) divesting in fossil fuels progresses, by many of the masters of the financial universe, the short memories of petrochemicals' golden goose...
THE ROAD TO GLOBAL FASCISM: How Wall Street Investment Banks Use ...
https://stillnessinthestorm.com › 2021 › 04 › the-road-to-global-fascism-how-wall-street-investment-banks-use-coercion-to-promote-social-justice-climate-change-and-globalism
Apr 19, 2021Italian Dictator Mussolini said fascism was "rule by corporations." Mussolini's definition has mutated where the global elites are now starting to use a corporate social credit score to exert control over corporations and free-market enterprise. ... ESG is Woke Corporate Culture. ESG is a corporate rating system that stands for ...
The Hidden Fascism of Big Tech and ESG Investing - Rod D. Martin
https://rodmartin.org › the-hidden-fascism-of-big-tech-and-esg-investing
Sep 13, 2021by Rod D. Martin September 13, 2021 Rod D. Martin on Economic War Room with Kevin Freeman: The Hidden Fascism of Big Tech and ESG Investing, and How We Can Beat It. The Hidden Fascism behind the Hard Left Democrat Party's National Socialism Agenda — The Hidden Fascism of Big Tech and ESG Investing appeared as a Facebook post by Rod D. Martin.
ESG Is Modern Day Fascism and It Is Going to Be Deadly
https://www.shaledirectories.com › blog-1 › esg-is-modern-day-fascism-and-it-is-going-to-be-deadly
The similarities between the effects of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) divesting strategy and fascism are scary as efforts to cease the use of crude oil could be the greatest threat to civilization, not climate change.
ESG Impact Is Hard to Measure — But It's Not Impossible
https://hbr.org › 2021 › 01 › esg-impact-is-hard-to-measure-but-its-not-impossible
Jan 22, 2021ESG measurement is an increasingly popular way of holding companies accountable when it comes to sustainability efforts, and of giving companies an incentive to improve them. But measurement, no ...
Fascism | Definition, Meaning, Characteristics, Examples, & History ...
https://www.britannica.com › topic › fascism
fascism, political ideology and mass movement that dominated many parts of central, southern, and eastern Europe between 1919 and 1945 and that also had adherents in western Europe, the United States, South Africa, Japan, Latin America, and the Middle East. Europe's first fascist leader, Benito Mussolini, took the name of his party from the Latin word fasces, which referred to a bundle of ...
Matthew Lau: ESG is unnecessary and harmful | Financial Post
https://financialpost.com › opinion › matthew-lau-esg-is-unnecessary-and-harmful
Oct 13, 2021The ESG movement — the acronym stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance — purports to improve the market economy by making corporate activity kinder, gentler, more compassionate, and otherwise better for society by redistributing the economic gains generated by corporations from shareholders to various "stakeholders.".
 
Last edited:
serendipity said:
This is what Perry Thrombosis had to say!

Carter was DEFINITELY among the top. He was a trained nuclear operator as I understood it.
Click to expand...
He was trained as a Nuclear operator.
He didn't complete the training because his father died and he resigned his commission.
 
serendipity said:
The article says he was one of the few that could do the work, which implies he was pretty high in the pecking order not just a mere operator. I am just confused to be honest.
Click to expand...

In my opinion, (I have a friend who's long diseased father worked at the Atomic Energy Commision) was an Atomic Engineer.
He was a trained engineer, an operator is lower in my opinion.

I suppose there is semantics at the root of this discussion.
 
Rune said:
It is a treatise on mining ore, smelting ore into metal and refining the metal.
Click to expand...

Yeah a geology textbook. An early one, granted, but your point isn't really particularly real since geology as a field didn't exist at the time Agricola wrote it.

There is geology involved in mining obviously, but it isn't a book about geology, as illustrated by the title.
Click to expand...

Hate to break it to you but among those of us who actually got our degrees in geology it is considered an early geologic text.
 
Dip Shit said:
Yeah a geology textbook. An early one, granted, but your point isn't really particularly real since geology as a field didn't exist at the time Agricola wrote it.



Hate to break it to you but among those of us who actually got our degrees in geology it is considered an early geologic text.
Click to expand...
Hate to break it to you but those of us who got our degrees in metallurgy consider it an early metalworking book.

early 15c., "of metal, made from metal," from Latin metallicus "of or belonging to metal," from Greek metallikos, from metallon "metal, ore" (see metal). Specific use in chemistry, indicating the condition of a metal in which it exists by itself, not mineralized or combined with substances which convert it into an ore, is by 1797.

metallica etymology - Search (bing.com)
 
Rune said:
It is a treatise on mining ore, smelting ore into metal and refining the metal.

It is a metalworking book.
There is geology involved in mining obviously, but it isn't a book about geology, as illustrated by the title.
Click to expand...
Perry Phimosis said:
Yeah a geology textbook. An early one, granted, but your point isn't really particularly real since geology as a field didn't exist at the time Agricola wrote it.

Hate to break it to you but among those of us who actually got our degrees in geology it is considered an early geologic text.
Click to expand...

I love watching Purists argue since they are often both right and wrong at the same time. LOL

Britannica lists Agricola as "the father of mineralogy" and among the first to "found a natural science based on observation". It is from such humble beginnings that many specialized areas of study branched, such as metallurgy and geology.

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Georgius-Agricola
German scholar and scientist known as “the father of mineralogy.” While a highly educated classicist and humanist, well regarded by scholars of his own and later times, he was yet singularly independent of the theories of ancient authorities. He was indeed among the first to found a natural science upon observation, as opposed to speculation. His De re metallica dealt chiefly with the arts of mining and smelting, and his De natura fossilium, considered the first mineralogy textbook, presented the first scientific classification of minerals (based on their physical properties) and described many new minerals and their occurrence and mutual relationships.
Click to expand...
 
Dutch Uncle said:
I love watching Purists argue since they are often both right and wrong at the same time. LOL
Click to expand...

It isn't a "purist" position for me. It is both things. Most people think mining is somehow different from geology because we teach them in different buildings on the campus. But they are integral to each other.

It is a sign that the other poster has no actual training in either topic that they would demand a hard-line differentiation from a time before either field existed.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
I love watching Purists argue since they are often both right and wrong at the same time. LOL

Britannica lists Agricola as "the father of mineralogy" and among the first to "found a natural science based on observation". It is from such humble beginnings that many specialized areas of study branched, such as metallurgy and geology.

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Georgius-Agricola
Click to expand...

I read last week that a reason military technology and capability exploded in the iron age is because iron minerals are so widespread and readily available, whereas the tin needed for bronze weapons is relatively rare and hard to obtain.

In the realm of science competition, my favorite story is about the one time geologists outperformed physicists -- in the debate over the age of the Earth. Physicists thought the Earth was only a few million years old based on measurements of heat dissipation. Geologists thought the Earth was way older, possibly hundreds of millions of years, because of observations of erosion and deposition.
 
Perry Phimosis said:
It isn't a "purist" position for me. It is both things. Most people think mining is somehow different from geology because we teach them in different buildings on the campus. But they are integral to each other.

It is a sign that the other poster has no actual training in either topic that they would demand a hard-line differentiation from a time before either field existed.
Click to expand...
Hence my point. You both are playing semantic games about how to categorize your individual specialties.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top