The 'Threat' of Gog and Magog???

USFREEDOM911 said:
The "Jews wanted Jesus crucified" thing, came about as just another way for people to justify their hatred and fear of the Jews.
Click to expand...

Many rabbis were fed up with jesus and his righteousness. They did vote set free barrabas rather than jesus. You can't solely blame romans for the crucifixion of jesus. No sir. He was a thorn in plenty of sides.
 
Strange that he was cruciifed just a few days after he ran the money changers from the temple.

bootlicks in the Pharisees were Jews.
 
Socrtease said:
IF you are a jew for jesus it is self loathing because you have to accept the revisionist history that it was the Jews that wanted Christ crucified when it was the Romans and their bootlicks in the Pharisees that wanted him dead.
Click to expand...

???....Christ wasn't crucified because of Romans or Jews....he was crucified because we were disobedient......it was a self-sacrifice.....
 
uscitizen said:
Strange that he was cruciifed just a few days after he ran the money changers from the temple.

bootlicks in the Pharisees were Jews.
Click to expand...

???....he ran the money changers out of the temple two years before he was crucified.....it was at the time of the first Passover he celebrated in Jerusalem, the crucifixion occurred during the third....
 
AssHatZombie said:
Many rabbis were fed up with jesus and his righteousness. They did vote set free barrabas rather than jesus. You can't solely blame romans for the crucifixion of jesus. No sir. He was a thorn in plenty of sides.
Click to expand...

OOPS, I forgot about the "many".

Are you professing that more Jews wanted Jesus dead, when compated to the Romans??
 
AssHatZombie said:
You're the one who can't read and understand basic stories of the bible. Shrugsky.
Click to expand...

lol.....I'm sorry Asshat, but you've never demonstrated any accurate knowledge of ANYTHING related to religion....apparently you seem drawn to debate those things you know the least about.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....I'm sorry Asshat, but you've never demonstrated any accurate knowledge of ANYTHING related to religion....apparently you seem drawn to debate those things you know the least about.....
Click to expand...

LOl.

You don't understand the basic narrative of the jesus story.
 
Saying that only romans killed jesus and jews had nothing to do with it is just the kind of crazy noahide revisionism we're used to seeing.
 
AssHatZombie said:
LOl.

You don't understand the basic narrative of the jesus story.
Click to expand...

???....you mean the "he died for our sins" part?....you're the one who thinks we need to apportion the blame between the Jews and the Romans.....obviously you missed an important part somewhere along the line.....
 
AssHatZombie said:
Saying that only romans killed jesus and jews had nothing to do with it is just the kind of crazy noahide revisionism we're used to seeing.
Click to expand...

lol, saying either one are to blame shows us something about crazy revisionism, all right....you are very quick to criticize a religion you have no grasp of......perhaps you should actually study it, clear up your misconceptions.....then you would have less to argue about....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol, saying either one are to blame shows us something about crazy revisionism, all right....you are very quick to criticize a religion you have no grasp of......perhaps you should actually study it, clear up your misconceptions.....then you would have less to argue about....
Click to expand...

Set me straight then.

You still refuse to believe that god commanded the hebrews to slaughter neighboring tribes and destroy their religious places.

From all i've seen. Your ignorant, in denial, or a bit of both.


You only reveal yourself as the noahide jew worshipper you are when attempt to obscure such basic points in the bible.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Set me straight then.

You still refuse to believe that god commanded the hebrews to slaughter neighboring tribes and destroy their religious places.

From all i've seen. Your ignorant, in denial, or a bit of both.


You only reveal yourself as the noahide jew worshipper you are when attempt to obscure such basic points in the bible.
Click to expand...

first of all, I have never heard anyone but you talk about "noahide" and you've never defined it since I arrived in July.....I expect it's some figment of your imagination that bears no resemblance to the Christian religion, but I can only deny it based on that assumption....I am fully aware of the basic points of the Bible, further I am aware that you haven't a clue about any of them, based upon the multiple errors you espouse in your posts....

as for being "set straight", see post #43......

I suspect then, for you to say I am in denial, should best be interpreted as meaning I am properly on track.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
first of all, I have never heard anyone but you talk about "noahide" and you've never defined it since I arrived in July.....I expect it's some figment of your imagination that bears no resemblance to the Christian religion, but I can only deny it based on that assumption....I am fully aware of the basic points of the Bible, further I am aware that you haven't a clue about any of them, based upon the multiple errors you espouse in your posts....

as for being "set straight", see post #43......

I suspect then, for you to say I am in denial, should best be interpreted as meaning I am properly on track.....
Click to expand...

You phaild.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top