I have a racist comment to make:
Obama is a lousy president.
Thank you.
Good true, but no cigar...come on sweetie, you can do better than this, have bravo or Dixie coach you on racism! Even Damo can do better than this!
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
No, the GOP regained the House and some Senate seats because a good portion of the people who voted for Obama sat on their hands in protests of his over-compromising with the neocon GOP. The records show lower voter turn out in the States, Damo....and history shows the GOP has done better with lower voter turn out in the last 40 years of so. Deal with it.
I think you misinterpret, and that if the economy doesn't improve and we continue on the path to stagflation that Obama will be as vulnerable as Bush Sr. in his reelection bid. So far, the path to stagflation is well set, and Bernanke went out and warned that we will continue on that path with a prediction of meager growth. Foolishly they are attempting to tell people that there is "no inflation", the same people who are staring higher prices in the face.
I'm good with you believing that there is some guarantee for Obama. Seriously, this conversation is wasted. I notice that you did realize that the ads I talked about would be effective, even if you don't want to admit it, it was in your omission... not your inclusion. I'm good with that.
I hope you remain sure of the immediate reelection of Obama, I hope you can convince every Democrat that nobody cares about the Debt and that Obama is a shoo-in.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Tweedle Dumber complimenting Tweedle Dumb. Look up the word "tinge", my intellectually impotent Bravo.
you were flat out whipped. end of story. all your pseudo intellectual ramblings are worthless right now.
How about "I want to see his birth certificate" ?/????Good try, but no cigar...come on sweetie, you can do better than this, have bravo or Dixie coach you on racism! Even Damo can do better than this!
How about "I want to see his birth certificate" ?/????
Thats racist....
I didn't work for Chris Matthews but it sure worked for Trump.....
So like every other intellectually dishonest neocon, Damo just IGNORES information that disproves his assertions on one point and then just repeats a previous claim.
I referring to documented FACT, while YOU are treating your personal supposition and conjecture as such. Just enter "low voter turnout 2010" in a google search to verify what I'm saying. I expected better of you, Damo...hope springs eternal.
More people believe that tax cuts and lower spending are the way to go.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...feel_tax_cuts_less_spending_will_help_economy
I don't know why I want you to understand, but it is reality. There was low turnout because Obama's independent supporters felt buyers remorse, the republicans won because their ideas got more people to the booths than those of the democrats.
But again, I truly hope you are successful in convincing every democrat that there is no need to worry, Obama is a shoo-in. I should stop now, and let you convince all the democrats that you "won the debate," that way you can be more sure that Obama is just a walk-in.
So like every other intellectually dishonest neocon, Damo just IGNORES information that disproves his assertions on one point and then just repeats a previous claim.
I referring to documented FACT, while YOU are treating your personal supposition and conjecture as such. Just enter "low voter turnout 2010" in a google search to verify what I'm saying. I expected better of you, Damo...hope springs eternal.
Most people know Rasmussen has a documented penchant for backing the neocon mantra du jour despite the majority of polls pointing in the opposite direction. But reality has a habit of cutting through the BS:
http://www.pollster.com/blogs/polling_repeal_of_the_bush_tax.php?nr=1
Sorry Damo, you can't get the stink of Buchanan and Kern off of the birthers & teabaggers who mouthed the same attitudes and mindset over the last two years. That's one major take away from the GOP voting base. The rest is not a lock as you would perceive, either. Deal with it.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Most people know Rasmussen has a documented penchant for backing the neocon mantra du jour despite the majority of polls pointing in the opposite direction. But reality has a habit of cutting through the BS:
http://www.pollster.com/blogs/pollin...h_tax.php?nr=1
Sorry Damo, you can't get the stink of Buchanan and Kern off of the birthers & teabaggers who mouthed the same attitudes and mindset over the last two years. That's one major take away from the GOP voting base. The rest is not a lock as you would perceive, either. Deal with it.
You're such a neocon Taichiliberal.
Just like Bush one and just like our current president,,,,,,,,, Bush two. (Obama)
we also notice how your vocabulary seems limited to neocons, teabaggers, threepers, and chronology.
Now now Clarabell....all that silly shit you posted in 29 and 30 was discredited by major media long long ago and your re-writing it doesn't change things....It was proven lies then and its still lies...Oh yeah, Trump is made out to be a chump, the birthers are disgraced, and neither Buchanan or YOU, my intellectually impotent Bravo, have the cojones to answer a simple questions......why should this President be constantly asked to confirm his identity AFTER being elected? No other President has gone through this, so what is it about this President that warrants such treatment? Posts #29 and 30 are STILL making a fool out of Bravo.
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;811093 said:If he left out "chronology" and added "internet blowhard", he'd have covered the rest of your synonyms, Smarter Than Few.
we also notice how your vocabulary seems limited to neocons, teabaggers, threepers, and chronology.
Notice folks, that this Liberty fool does not have the intellectual capacity or courage to actually debate the issue (example being my last response to Damo)....but just follows me around spitting sour grapes. So until Liberty grows up, he'll be ignored.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Oh yeah, Trump is made out to be a chump, the birthers are disgraced, and neither Buchanan or YOU, my intellectually impotent Bravo, have the cojones to answer a simple questions......why should this President be constantly asked to confirm his identity AFTER being elected? No other President has gone through this, so what is it about this President that warrants such treatment? Posts #29 and 30 are STILL making a fool out of Bravo.
Now now Clarabell You must be MUCH older than I am, my Bravo bumpkin, because when I was a kid, Howdy Doody wasn't cutting it on TV....guess that "insult" must rate with your barstool buddies. ....all that silly shit you posted in 29 and 30 was discredited by major media long long ago and your re-writing it doesn't change things....It was proven lies then and its still lies...
Pity YOU, my Bravo bumpkin, cannot produce any valid, documented FACTS to back up what you say. I surely can, as always. Just ask, if you've got any true "bravado".
and as to you question......damn, you got me.....I don't know the answer to that.....but he finally caved by making his bc public didn't he.....