SmarterthanYou
rebel
LOL then explain why US Senators were selected by state legislatures before the 17th Amendment?Lol, nope. You've been watching that prager "university" crap.
LOL then explain why US Senators were selected by state legislatures before the 17th Amendment?Lol, nope. You've been watching that prager "university" crap.
The weight of water can be calculated from the atomic weight of water, and for the moles of water in the container.... because you have no clue what a fact is.
Ummmmm, actually, facts DO require my approval (BY DEFINITION) or else they are not facts.
EXAMPLE #1: Let's say that you and I are discussing the weight of a gallon of water (at "room temperature"). You say that it weighs 5 pounds. I say that it weighs a bit over 8 pounds. HERE, there is no existence of a fact (since we both disagree about the weight of a gallon of water).
EXAMPLE #2: Let's say that you and I are discussing the weight of a gallon of water (at "room temperature"). You say that it weighs a bit over 8 pounds. I agree with your assertion. HERE, a fact has now been formed (since we both agree about the weight of a gallon of water).
EXAMPLE #3: Let's say that you and I are discussing the weight of a gallon of water (at "room temperature"). You say that it weighs 5 pounds. I agree with your assertion. HERE, a fact has now been formed (since we both agree about the weight of a gallon of water).
In example #1, there is no fact in existence. You are making one claim and I am making an opposing claim. We now need to go through the extended process of forming arguments in order to support our opposing claims.
In example #2, there IS a fact in existence. You made a claim and I agreed with it. There is now no need for us to go through the extended process of forming arguments in order to support the claim being made (since we both agree with it).
In example #3, there IS a fact in existence. You made a claim and I agreed with it. There is now no need for us to go through the extended process of forming arguments in order to support the claim being made (since we both agree with it).
NOTICE: In example #2, the fact that was formed also happened to be true, meanwhile the fact that was formed in example #3 happened to be FALSE. 'Fact' and 'True' are NOT interchangeable terms.
A fact is simply a form of shorthand predicate. Facts are useful for shortening the length of discussions. In and of itself, there is nothing "holy" about a fact. Claiming the mere existence of a fact (whether one actually exists or not) is NOT a "trump card".
... until they're not.
Since we can't even establish a fact about what a fact is, and you have no desire to learn about that which you do not know, I have the feeling that very few facts will be established between us.
Mantra 1a. Lame.
Strawman fallacy. Redefinition fallacy. Slavery is not a democracy. The United States was never a democracy.Actually no, it's not wrong. It's right in there with the 3/5 doctrine.
You made a pretty good explanation. I'm not surprised he just went into an argument of the Stone fallacy and started throwing insults.^^^ This is YOUR issue.
You refuse to learn. I already explained the details to you about what a fact is and how facts work, but you completely ignored it.
He actually tried to argue that slavery was 'democracy'!!your history class failed you. All of the founders were against a 'pure' democracy because they feared mob rule.
Again, the term 'constitutional republic' is redundant. A republic has a constitution by definition.And who might that be? I've known all about our government for decades now. I just put that meme up
there so you brainless libs can get the real facts of the U.S. being a Constitutional Republic, and not as
you libs believe it to be a democracy.
Inversion fallacy. Omniscience fallacy. Mantra 1a. Lame. MAGA isn't a person.Your anger is only matched by your pin-headed narrowmindedness, Hater. You've repeatedly proved you are a liar, not a Christian and not the brightest person even among MAGAts. In short, you're a fucking idiot. No wonder you're a loser who hates others.
Strawman fallacy. Mantra 1a. Lame.Lol, nope. You've been watching that prager "university" crap.
Indeed. I would like to see the 17th amendment repealed.LOL then explain why US Senators were selected by state legislatures before the 17th Amendment?
Yes, yes you are.Mantra 1a. Lame.
I love the poorly educated.Strawman fallacy. Redefinition fallacy. Slavery is not a democracy. The United States was never a democracy.
Yes, yes you are.Lame.
SOME of them did not. However the EC was not an attempt to keep us from a democracy. They did that by picking who could vote. It was landed educated people. It was not women. Not blacks.wrong. all of it. maybe you should go back and read the historical beliefs of the founders not wanting a pure democracy.
No nation in history even wanted to be a 'pure democracy.' Notice only Trump fascists use this terminology.SOME of them did not. However the EC was not an attempt to keep us from a democracy. They did that by picking who could vote. It was landed educated people. It was not women. Not blacks.
LIF. Grow up.Yes, yes you are.
The United States was never a democracy.SOME of them did not.
The United States was never a democracy.However the EC was not an attempt to keep us from a democracy.
Irrelevant.They did that by picking who could vote. It was landed educated people. It was not women. Not blacks.
There is no such thing as a 'pure' or 'impure' democracy. There is a democracy, or there is not. The United States was never a democracy. Trump is a capitalist. It is DEMOCRATS that are socialists. Fascism is a form of socialism. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON TRUMP!No nation in history even wanted to be a 'pure democracy.' Notice only Trump fascists use this terminology.
They are fighting the term democracy so Americans will figure "so what" when Trump wrecks it.No nation in history even wanted to be a 'pure democracy.' Notice only Trump fascists use this terminology.
Trump cannot "wreck" that which doesn't exist.They are fighting the term democracy so Americans will figure "so what" when Trump wrecks it.