THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS...

Over 200 posts and no one has been able to form a valid response to my OP.

"non-binary person" remains a meaningless buzzword...
 
gfm7175 said:
Webster's is wrong, and you continue to deny the etymology of the word.
There is more than one dictionary, dude. Ergo, there is no such thing as "the dictionary definition".
Click to expand...
It's amazing how many people figure a dictionary somehow defines a word, as if it owned the word. Unfortunately, etymology doesn't work for the Liberal language, since it's words have no definitions or meanings...hence your buzzword list gets rapidly longer and longer.
gfm7175 said:
I've already told you.
What other "way" of binary is there?
From the etymology that you deny, the word 'binary' comes from the Latin words 'binarius' (consisting of two) and 'bini' (two together).

A system consisting of only 0's and 1's (IOW, the base-2 number system) is a binary system.
A system consisting of only X's and Y's (IOW, the human sex chromosome system) is a binary system.
A system consisting of only male and female (IOW, the human sex ("gender") system) is a binary system.

Irrelevant. The system is binary, by definition, because it only makes use of 0's and 1's. That is the whole point, and what you are desperately flailing around in an attempt to deny.
Click to expand...
You are telling this to someone that doesn't know right or wrong. Good luck!
gfm7175 said:
......... anddddddddd here's the typical sock accusation... Obviously, you have nothing more of substance to offer at this point.
Click to expand...
Yeah. Don't you get tired of this lame tactic? They won't address your questions you put to them in the OP, and they would rather evade and try to pivot to their own personal agendas. When that doesn't work, out come the insults, including the YALSAs (Yet Another Lame Sock Accusation).

Every conservative is a sock.....right? :D

gfm7175 said:
Define "non-binary person".
Identify and describe a sex other than male or female.
Identify and describe a sex chromosome other than X or Y.
Click to expand...

Watch 'em evade again.
 
Mina said:
Entirely relevant, because it illustrates your category error. If you want to call the encoding system "binary," that's fine. In the same sense, in the computer you are using, "male" and "female" and "turnip" and "God," and "feces" are all recorded as a series of zeros and ones. But that doesn't mean there are only two things in that list. The computer can encode effectively infinite varieties of information using those on-off settings.
Click to expand...
There are only two things in the list: One and Zero. That's what binary means, dumbass.
There are only two genders: male and female. That's what binary means, dumbass.
There are only two sex chromosomes: X and Y. That's what binary means, dumbass.

Gfm has been kind enough (tolerant enough) to continue to repeat the etymology of the word 'binary'. This is how words are defined. You don't get to redefined them.

Mina said:
Similarly, the X and the Y are the two sex chromosomes in humans, but that doesn't mean there are only two sexual categories. There are X's and Y's and XY and XX and XXY and XYY and so on. You can call those "copying errors," but everything about us could be described that way. For example, the Y chromosome is widely believed to be the result of a copying error from a set of genes that used to be identical, somewhere between 166 and 300 million years ago. Copying errors are a fundamental feature of evolution.
Click to expand...

So your argument is that anything other than an XX pair or an XY pair is a freak of nature and a deformity. Gotit.
 
Into the Night said:
It's amazing how many people figure a dictionary somehow defines a word, as if it owned the word. Unfortunately, etymology doesn't work for the Liberal language, since it's words have no definitions or meanings...hence your buzzword list gets rapidly longer and longer.
Click to expand...
Very true. The List is now over 300 buzzwords and is growing as rapidly as it ever has. I'm still coming across a number of buzzwords that I've seen used in conversation numerous times before yet have managed to evade getting added to The List. Even if there was a way to form an all-inclusive list, it is apparent to me that Liberal allows for buzzwords to be formed at a faster rate than I can keep up with.

However, thankfully the purpose of forming and maintaining The List is not for it to be all-inclusive (an impossible goal), but rather to provide a "stunning visual" for people, one that shows how too many people have allowed for way too much gibberbabble to become common parlance.

Into the Night said:
Yeah. Don't you get tired of this lame tactic? They won't address your questions you put to them in the OP, and they would rather evade and try to pivot to their own personal agendas. When that doesn't work, out come the insults, including the YALSAs (Yet Another Lame Sock Accusation).
Click to expand...
I sure do.

Into the Night said:
Every conservative is a sock.....right? :D
Click to expand...
Of course! ;)

Into the Night said:
Watch 'em evade again.
Click to expand...
Dodge, duck, dip, dive, and dodge. The "five D's of dodgeball". It's all they have.
 
gfm7175 said:
... a "gender non-binary person". Change my mind.


Here are the rules of this thread; the requirements in order to change my mind:

[1] You MUST clearly and unambiguously define the term "gender non-binary person" (or "genderqueer person") in a manner that doesn't violate logic and/or science. --- Any and all appeals to HOLY LINKS (e.g, to Wikipedia or to a random dictionary definition) are NOT ALLOWED and will be summarily dismissed on sight.

[2] You MUST clearly and unambiguously describe a "third option" of some sort. Meaning, you must identify and describe:

[2a] A sex other than male or female.
[2b] A sex chromosome other than X or Y.


The floor is yours!
Click to expand...

There are two genders: male (they have small sex cells: sperm) and female (they have large sex cells: eggs)

Those are the only options.
 
gfm7175 said:
... a "gender non-binary person". Change my mind.


Here are the rules of this thread; the requirements in order to change my mind:

[1] You MUST clearly and unambiguously define the term "gender non-binary person" (or "genderqueer person") in a manner that doesn't violate logic and/or science. --- Any and all appeals to HOLY LINKS (e.g, to Wikipedia or to a random dictionary definition) are NOT ALLOWED and will be summarily dismissed on sight.

[2] You MUST clearly and unambiguously describe a "third option" of some sort. Meaning, you must identify and describe:

[2a] A sex other than male or female.
[2b] A sex chromosome other than X or Y.


The floor is yours!
Click to expand...




Human bodies include minds


No mind means genitalia is meaningless


That physical genitalia is connected to a human mind


You can’t just ZERO out that mind because your mind is simple and incapable of recognizing that fact


Your idea is failed
 
ZenMode said:
There are two genders: male (they have small sex cells: sperm) and female (they have large sex cells: eggs)

Those are the only options.
Click to expand...

And both are connected to a complex human mind


Interesting you folks want minds zeroed out of the equation
 
evince said:
Human bodies include minds


No mind means genitalia is meaningless


That physical genitalia is connected to a human mind


You can’t just ZERO out that mind because your mind is simple and incapable of recognizing that fact


Your idea is failed
Click to expand...
What do any of those random phrases have to do with my OP??

Try again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top