THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS...

AProudLefty said:
Sex is biological. Gender is role and a social construct.
Click to expand...
Both words refer to human anatomy and are synonymous in usage.

Feelings and self delusions are not human anatomy.

Define "non-binary person"
Identify and describe a sex other than male or female.
Identify and describe a sex chromosome other than X or Y.
 
I think a core argument from the left has been identified here:

That 'gender' somehow means something other than the sex of a person, and is instead some kind of psychological disorder, that is somehow a benefit to the person suffering from it. it's ignoring English, of course, and it is often hard to translate Liberal, but this seems to be the current meaning of 'gender' in Liberal.
 
Into the Night said:
I think a core argument from the left has been identified here:

That 'gender' somehow means something other than the sex of a person, and is instead some kind of psychological disorder, that is somehow a benefit to the person suffering from it. it's ignoring English, of course, and it is often hard to translate Liberal, but this seems to be the current meaning of 'gender' in Liberal.
Click to expand...

Psychosychoquackery.
 
gfm7175 said:
Both words refer to human anatomy and are synonymous in usage.

Feelings and self delusions are not human anatomy.

Define "non-binary person"
Identify and describe a sex other than male or female.
Identify and describe a sex chromosome other than X or Y.
Click to expand...

RQAA
 
AProudLefty said:
There is no paradox.
Click to expand...
You can't clear your paradoxes by ignoring them, dude.
AProudLefty said:
No it is not. You do not get to redefine the word, dude.
Click to expand...
Inversion fallacy.
AProudLefty said:
Psychosychoquackery.
Click to expand...
It is YOUR argument. YOU brought it up. Now you call it psychoquackery???!? You are AGAIN denying your own argument???!?
AProudLefty said:
RQAA
Click to expand...
Lie. You never answered the questions presented in the OP.
 
Into the Night said:
You can't clear your paradoxes by ignoring them, dude.

Inversion fallacy.

It is YOUR argument. YOU brought it up. Now you call it psychoquackery???!? You are AGAIN denying your own argument???!?

Lie. You never answered the questions presented in the OP.
Click to expand...

I have answered multiple times. There are no others other than X and Y.

Sex is biological and gender is role.
 
gfm7175 said:
You seem to be pretending that 'gender' is not a synonym of 'sex'. You seem to be attempting to redefine the word 'gender' into leftist gibberbabble.

It would do you some good to study etymology.


As you will recall, my question in [2b] asks for a sex chromosome OTHER THAN X or Y, of which you have not provided here and seemingly cannot provide. Ergo, sex (or "gender", if you prefer) is still a BINARY system.


All of this is completely irrelevant and does not provide a sex chromosome other than X or Y.


Abnormalities are not normalities. --- This theoretical person is still male (XY chromosomes, presence of SRY gene). The system is still binary.


Incorrect. It is a simple binary matter. Abnormalities are not normalities.


No, it is not, except for liberals who love to gibberbabble incoherently.


Self delusion and/or feelings do not change biology or anatomy.


Self delusion and/or feelings do not change biology or anatomy.


Feelings are irrelevant.

You have, like all the others, failed to respond in accordance to the rules presented in my OP. Read the rules and try again.
Click to expand...

One...fuck your rules.

Two...some people apparently do not feel comfortable with the gender they had at birth...and want to do something about that.

What you ought to do is spend some time scoping out why that matters to you so much. Are you afraid of something?
 
Frank Apisa said:
One...fuck your rules.
Click to expand...
This is my thread, so my rules will be adhered to. If you wish to operate under your own rules, then make your own thread. My thread will be following my rules, as written in the OP.

Frank Apisa said:
Two...some people apparently do not feel comfortable with the gender they had at birth...and want to do something about that.
Click to expand...
Feelings are irrelevant, and gender cannot be changed. You are what you are. Deal with it.

Frank Apisa said:
What you ought to do is spend some time scoping out why that matters to you so much. Are you afraid of something?
Click to expand...
No, but apparently YOU are afraid of answering my questions per my rules within the OP. Why is that?

Science doesn't give a fuck about your feelings, dude.
 
gfm7175 said:
This is my thread, so my rules will be adhered to. If you wish to operate under your own rules, then make your own thread. My thread will be following my rules, as written in the OP.


Feelings are irrelevant, and gender cannot be changed. You are what you are. Deal with it.


No, but apparently YOU are afraid of answering my questions per my rules within the OP. Why is that?

Science doesn't give a fuck about your feelings, dude.
Click to expand...

Biological sex cannot be changed.
 
Into the Night said:
I think a core argument from the left has been identified here:

That 'gender' somehow means something other than the sex of a person, and is instead some kind of psychological disorder, that is somehow a benefit to the person suffering from it. it's ignoring English, of course, and it is often hard to translate Liberal, but this seems to be the current meaning of 'gender' in Liberal.
Click to expand...
This is the best that I can come up with as well.

They keep talking about "feelings" and "identifying as [something other than what they biologically are]", so I concur with your conclusion that 'gender', in Liberal, at least for the time being, must be a vague reference to some sort of psychological disorder. Liberal seems to never have any clear word definitions like English has, and there sure are a lot of buzzwords that I have noticed them use with regard to sex/gender.

I unfortunately don't have them all included on my Lispy Leftist List (who can keep up with these freaks??!!), but here is what I have so far with regard to this topic... Yes, these are all meaningless words that I have personally witnessed liberals use, thinking that they are actually saying something intelligent:

embodying all genders
full(y) female
full(y) male
gender
gender equality
gender fluid(ity)
gender identity
gender inclusive / gender inclusivity
gender neutral(ity)
gender non-binary
genderqueer
gender questioning
gender sense
gender spectrum
gender studies
human body spectrum
partial(ly) female
partial(ly) male
sexual identity
traditional binary opposition (male/female)
transition(ed)(ing) (male/female)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top