THEY WON'T DEFEND TRUMP!

Maybe Trump haters are trying to defend the record 47 + million on food stamps under Obama despite claims of jobs being created, a 19000 DOW is better than a 29000 DOW, or that record unemployment for all groups is better than the 10+ % during the previous 8 years.

Yank Apenis .... read this idiot !
 
This is a copy of a comment I made in another thread. But realized that if I were actually "doing as much as I can"...I would have dedicated a thread to my thoughts on it. So...here are those thoughts about the Trump defense team:


They won't DEFEND Trump...they can't.

It must be embarrassing for each of them to know people suppose that is what they are going to do.

They will say the least they can...and rest their case. They want to get out from under this bus they've got idling over them.

They know that if they do nothing but recite, "Mary had a little lamb"...they will win an acquittal.

This is farce at this point.

We have allowed one man to say, "I will do whatever I want...and nobody will dare to stop me."

No big deal. We were warned that this could happen just minutes after our Republic was established.**

In a way, I'm sad it happened on the watch of a generation of which I am a part. But I realize that I have done as much as I can to fight it...and that mitigates the sadness.

For those of you who are complicit...I suspect that when you realize what you have done you will cringe at how thoughtless you are being.


**"Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?"

"A Republic, if you can keep it."

Response attributed to Benjamin Franklin at the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, when queried as he left Independence Hall on the final day of deliberation, in the notes of Dr. James McHenry, one of Maryland's delegates to the Convention.

This is a copy of a comment I made in another thread. But realized that if I were actually "doing as much as I can"...I would have dedicated a thread to my thoughts on it. So...here are those thoughts about the Trump defense team:


They won't DEFEND Trump...they can't.

It must be embarrassing for each of them to know people suppose that is what they are going to do.

They will say the least they can...and rest their case. They want to get out from under this bus they've got idling over them.


I love your misguided partisan post Frank, How are you these days?

Actually Frank the way I see it Trump’s defense team has nothing to defend. The House has ZERO high crimes, Treason or Bribery charged against Trump. A misdemeanor being simply “bad behavior” is simply a matter of “opinion” Apparently your Democrat infested House is accusing Trump of the bad behavior of obstructing Congress. However, Trump never claimed Executive Privilege he simply threatened to claim it if they, (The House), called members of his administration as witnesses and Nancy and your rabid mad junkyard dog Democrat House Committee Chairman never even bothered to attempt to call any of those witnesses. Where’s the obstruction of Congress Frank? Since when is it obstruction of Congress Frank even if Trump had claimed Executive Privilege? Every President has claimed Executive Privilege. Congress has then the opportunity to go to court and have the privilege overturned Frank, that’s how a Constitutional Republic works Frank. Could it be that Nancy and your mad rabid junkyard dog Democrats know that if Trump claims Privilege, he’ll win in court?

Could it be Frank that this farce impeachment is Nancy’s trick to get Bernie off of the campaign trail and give “Quid-Pro-Quo Joe Biden a huge advantage in the Iowa Democrat caucus? Is that why Nan held the articles of Impeachment for a month to get closer to the Iowa vote and tie Burnie up in the Senate Frank? Is that really why Democrats are calling for witnesses in the Senate that they wouldn’t call in the House Frank? Nan and her Democrat partners in crime Frank had to get the Impeachment into the Senate at the right time where they could have a shot at prolonging it and keeping Bernie and Warren off of the campaign trail and rig another Democrat primary election to shove it up Bernie’s ass Frank. Look at the time line Frank, think about it Frank!
 
Maybe Trump haters are trying to defend the record 47 + million on food stamps under Obama despite claims of jobs being created, a 19000 DOW is better than a 29000 DOW, or that record unemployment for all groups is better than the 10+ % during the previous 8 years.

CFM is so defeated he has to deflect!
CFM the forums biggest coward!
 
**"Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?"

"A Republic, if you can keep it."

Response attributed to Benjamin Franklin at the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, when queried as he left Independence Hall on the final day of deliberation, in the notes of Dr. James McHenry, one of Maryland's delegates to the Convention.

And Trump has created a “Trump Monarchy” how Frank? You need to cast off your addiction to the crooked Democrat’s and their factitious talking points and CNN & MSNBC propaganda Frank and begin thinking for Frank!
 
This is a copy of a comment I made in another thread. But realized that if I were actually "doing as much as I can"...I would have dedicated a thread to my thoughts on it. So...here are those thoughts about the Trump defense team:


They won't DEFEND Trump...they can't.

It must be embarrassing for each of them to know people suppose that is what they are going to do.

They will say the least they can...and rest their case. They want to get out from under this bus they've got idling over them.

They know that if they do nothing but recite, "Mary had a little lamb"...they will win an acquittal.

This is farce at this point.

We have allowed one man to say, "I will do whatever I want...and nobody will dare to stop me."

No big deal. We were warned that this could happen just minutes after our Republic was established.**

In a way, I'm sad it happened on the watch of a generation of which I am a part. But I realize that I have done as much as I can to fight it...and that mitigates the sadness.

For those of you who are complicit...I suspect that when you realize what you have done you will cringe at how thoughtless you are being.


**"Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?"

"A Republic, if you can keep it."

Response attributed to Benjamin Franklin at the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, when queried as he left Independence Hall on the final day of deliberation, in the notes of Dr. James McHenry, one of Maryland's delegates to the Convention.

You don't seem to understand or grasp the categories which the people who support Trump fall under if you think for one second that they are capable of regret, truthfulness or realizations. There are several categories and I posted a thread about that a few days ago.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...Donald-Trump-Supporters&p=3445534#post3445534

And we can add end of times Evangelicals to the list.
 
Only a left wing idiot would ask how unemployment at record lows, food stamp use going back down, and jobs being created isn't better off.

Hitler's government did all of that in the mid-1930s. Was Germany "better off"? In a sense, yes. In a more important sense they were on the highway to hell.

I'm not comparing Trump to Hitler. But three years of this administration have normalized incompetence, cynical divisiveness, abuse of power, contempt for American tradition, and constant shameless lying by the First Citizen. Hardly anyone raises an eyebrow now; it's taken for granted.

His party (the party he battened on to) will not stop him. Its senior elements, those who haven't quit or died, are too concerned for their own positions. So he will be "exonerated".

Only the People can stop him - if they really want to.
 
Hitler's government did all of that in the mid-1930s. Was Germany "better off"? In a sense, yes. In a more important sense they were on the highway to hell.

I'm not comparing Trump to Hitler. But three years of this administration have normalized incompetence, cynical divisiveness, abuse of power, contempt for American tradition, and constant shameless lying by the First Citizen. Hardly anyone raises an eyebrow now; it's taken for granted.

His party (the party he battened on to) will not stop him. Its senior elements, those who haven't quit or died, are too concerned for their own positions. So he will be "exonerated".

Only the People can stop him - if they really want to.

Trump can be compared to any dictator and it will be accurate. The fuckwad has more than proven his sadism and sociopathy and his willingness to do whatever benefits him. Caging and separating kids from their families and excusing the Saudis butchering of Khashoggi is Nazi to the umpteenth degree.

USA....meet your Sweet Potato HITLER and shame the "F" on us!
 
the Dems are not trying to remove the 2016 election, the Repugs are trying to ignore the 2018 election. There was a message sent their way but they cannot read it or understand it.
 
I love your misguided partisan post Frank, How are you these days?

Actually Frank the way I see it Trump’s defense team has nothing to defend. The House has ZERO high crimes, Treason or Bribery charged against Trump. A misdemeanor being simply “bad behavior” is simply a matter of “opinion” Apparently your Democrat infested House is accusing Trump of the bad behavior of obstructing Congress. However, Trump never claimed Executive Privilege he simply threatened to claim it if they, (The House), called members of his administration as witnesses and Nancy and your rabid mad junkyard dog Democrat House Committee Chairman never even bothered to attempt to call any of those witnesses. Where’s the obstruction of Congress Frank? Since when is it obstruction of Congress Frank even if Trump had claimed Executive Privilege? Every President has claimed Executive Privilege. Congress has then the opportunity to go to court and have the privilege overturned Frank, that’s how a Constitutional Republic works Frank. Could it be that Nancy and your mad rabid junkyard dog Democrats know that if Trump claims Privilege, he’ll win in court?

Could it be Frank that this farce impeachment is Nancy’s trick to get Bernie off of the campaign trail and give “Quid-Pro-Quo Joe Biden a huge advantage in the Iowa Democrat caucus? Is that why Nan held the articles of Impeachment for a month to get closer to the Iowa vote and tie Burnie up in the Senate Frank? Is that really why Democrats are calling for witnesses in the Senate that they wouldn’t call in the House Frank? Nan and her Democrat partners in crime Frank had to get the Impeachment into the Senate at the right time where they could have a shot at prolonging it and keeping Bernie and Warren off of the campaign trail and rig another Democrat primary election to shove it up Bernie’s ass Frank. Look at the time line Frank, think about it Frank!

All these words due to the lack of any defense of the indefensible. OMFG!
 
Hitler's government did all of that in the mid-1930s. Was Germany "better off"? In a sense, yes. In a more important sense they were on the highway to hell.

I'm not comparing Trump to Hitler. But three years of this administration have normalized incompetence, cynical divisiveness, abuse of power, contempt for American tradition, and constant shameless lying by the First Citizen. Hardly anyone raises an eyebrow now; it's taken for granted.

His party (the party he battened on to) will not stop him. Its senior elements, those who haven't quit or died, are too concerned for their own positions. So he will be "exonerated".

Only the People can stop him - if they really want to.

No one raises an eyebrow except left wingers that are still pissed about losing in 2016. The problem with their eyebrow raising is that's it nothing more than an attempt to run a duly elected President out of office because they can't put in place their programs.

He will be exonerated because he did nothing wrong. You have all the left wing talking points down.

Maybe you want another incompetent Obama type back to make yourself feel better about electing a black guy or maybe you want a female because you think it's time we have a woman President. Neither of those is a qualification. It may make you feel better inside but it doesn't do the country a bit of good.
 
CFM is so defeated he has to deflect!
CFM the forums biggest coward!

So you're defending 47+ million freeloaders on food stamps?

So you're defending a DOW of 19000 as better than 29000?

So you're defending an unemployment rate of 10+% over record lows?

When your primary purpose for supporting someone is because you like kissing black ass, you'll defend anything, boy.
 
Yank Apenis .... read this idiot !

Not sure why you think I am an idiot, but...if it makes you feel better about yourself...have a ball.

I read it. So...are you saying that because Trump is doing for America what Hitler did for Germany...that "we are better" for it.

C'mon!
 
I love your misguided partisan post Frank, How are you these days?

Doing great, Robo...although I would be doing even better if the weather breaks enough for a round of golf or several.

Actually Frank the way I see it Trump’s defense team has nothing to defend. The House has ZERO high crimes, Treason or Bribery charged against Trump. A misdemeanor being simply “bad behavior” is simply a matter of “opinion” Apparently your Democrat infested House is accusing Trump of the bad behavior of obstructing Congress. However, Trump never claimed Executive Privilege he simply threatened to claim it if they, (The House), called members of his administration as witnesses and Nancy and your rabid mad junkyard dog Democrat House Committee Chairman never even bothered to attempt to call any of those witnesses. Where’s the obstruction of Congress Frank? Since when is it obstruction of Congress Frank even if Trump had claimed Executive Privilege? Every President has claimed Executive Privilege. Congress has then the opportunity to go to court and have the privilege overturned Frank, that’s how a Constitutional Republic works Frank. Could it be that Nancy and your mad rabid junkyard dog Democrats know that if Trump claims Privilege, he’ll win in court?

Okay. Thank you for sharing that.

Could it be Frank that this farce impeachment is Nancy’s trick to get Bernie off of the campaign trail and give “Quid-Pro-Quo Joe Biden a huge advantage in the Iowa Democrat caucus? Is that why Nan held the articles of Impeachment for a month to get closer to the Iowa vote and tie Burnie up in the Senate Frank? Is that really why Democrats are calling for witnesses in the Senate that they wouldn’t call in the House Frank? Nan and her Democrat partners in crime Frank had to get the Impeachment into the Senate at the right time where they could have a shot at prolonging it and keeping Bernie and Warren off of the campaign trail and rig another Democrat primary election to shove it up Bernie’s ass Frank. Look at the time line Frank, think about it Frank!

I've given it lots of thought, Robo...and all I can offer is what I would like our elected officials to do.

I would like them to investigate the charges brought against Trump...and decide whether to vote to find him guilty or to acquit him. They are very serious charges.

I'd prefer that they call as many witnesses as possible...and to demand as much in the way of evidence as they can...so that they can make as informed a decision as possible.

Would you prefer that they not do that?
 
All these words due to the lack of any defense of the indefensible. OMFG!

How does one defend a non-crime? All the President's lawyers need to do is point out the hundreds of lies spewed in the Democrat's 24 hour marathon of repetitious, boring hogwash. The end game here is either a successful vote by the Senate to dismiss, or not guilty. The trick for Nancy and her House henchmen is to prolong it long enough to screw Bernie & Warren & allow Quid-Pro-Quo Joe to have the campaign trail all to himself, huh?

You'd be more credible if you had a few sentences of actual logical rebuttal for my post, but I never expect such from the left. Ya never have credible, logical rebuttal for my truths! I understand why!
 
How does one defend a non-crime? All the President's lawyers need to do is point out the hundreds of lies spewed in the Democrat's 24 hour marathon of repetitious, boring hogwash. The end game here is either a successful vote by the Senate to dismiss, or not guilty. The trick for Nancy and her House henchmen is to prolong it long enough to screw Bernie & Warren & allow Quid-Pro-Quo Joe to have the campaign trail all to himself, huh?

You'd be more credible if you had a few sentences of actual logical rebuttal for my post, but I never expect such from the left. Ya never have credible, logical rebuttal for my truths! I understand why!

One does not need to defend someone against something that didn't occur. That would be like trying to prove Leprechauns exist.
 
And Trump has created a “Trump Monarchy” how Frank? You need to cast off your addiction to the crooked Democrat’s and their factitious talking points and CNN & MSNBC propaganda Frank and begin thinking for Frank!

I am thinking for myself, Robo.

You seem to be out of sorts, old friend. Try not to get all worked up.

I have not asserted that Trump has created a monarchy. In fact, I've not even mentioned "monarchy." YOU did.

I think Trump would love to be dictator...but I think he is more suited to become dick head. He's pretty much already there.

I am anxious that he not succeed in that endeavor.

Do you prefer that he become dictator?
 
Not sure why you think I am an idiot, but...if it makes you feel better about yourself...have a ball.

I read it. So...are you saying that because Trump is doing for America what Hitler did for Germany...that "we are better" for it.

C'mon!

It's clear that Trump is doing what your black BOY Obama couldn't do.

What's a shame is that you don't have the guts to admit it and would rather kiss his black ass than admit you're wrong.

Pucker up, n-l.
 
I am thinking for myself, Robo.

You seem to be out of sorts, old friend. Try not to get all worked up.

I have not asserted that Trump has created a monarchy. In fact, I've not even mentioned "monarchy." YOU did.

I think Trump would love to be dictator...but I think he is more suited to become dick head. He's pretty much already there.

I am anxious that he not succeed in that endeavor.

Do you prefer that he become dictator?

So paranoid about something that isn't going to happen. Hopefully it will cause your blood pressure to go sky high and your old ass will stroke out.

As for what you've become, pucker up n-lover.
 
Back
Top