THEY WON'T DEFEND TRUMP!

NYT saw an excerpt from Bolton's book that said Trump tied the aid in Ukraine with the Biden investigations. I see why the Reds are preventing testimonies. Moscow Mitch is preventing a fair and real trial for political reasons. But we all knew that, didn't we? The difference is the Rebugs don't care if they cheat or lie. Just trying to get to a "win"/
 
NYT saw an excerpt from Bolton's book that said Trump tied the aid in Ukraine with the Biden investigations. I see why the Reds are preventing testimonies. Moscow Mitch is preventing a fair and real trial for political reasons. But we all knew that, didn't we? The difference is the Rebugs don't care if they cheat or lie. Just trying to get to a "win"/

So what ! The President has a right to investigate crimes ....
 
So what ! The President has a right to investigate crimes ....

What does that mean? Oh, you really bought that trump was concerned with Ukraine's corruption. I did not know people were that gullible. Yovanovich has a reputation of working to eliminate corruption. That is why Rudy and Trump wanted her gone. The president does not investigate crimes. he has about 15 agencies that do that job. He did not use them. he used Rudy and his band of thieves. What does it take for you to see the truth?
 
Look Dave, I can see you're really upset about this. I honestly think you ought
to sit down calmly, take a stress pill, and think things over. I can give you my
complete assurance that my work will be back to normal. I've still got the greatest
enthusiasm and confidence in the mission. And I want to help you.
This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.

sherlock.gif

I'm from New Jersey, and I gotcha "cretin" right heah."

I am pointing to my crotch while saying it.

Are you asking him to suck your dick ?

original.38934.jpg
 
Hitler was a liberal socialist. Let that sink in for a minute.

Hitler was a monster...and one of the worst things ever to happen to his nation.

Trump is a monster...and one of the worst things ever to happen to ours.

Let that sink in for much longer than a minute.
 
What does that mean? Oh, you really bought that trump was concerned with Ukraine's corruption. I did not know people were that gullible. Yovanovich has a reputation of working to eliminate corruption. That is why Rudy and Trump wanted her gone. The president does not investigate crimes. he has about 15 agencies that do that job. He did not use them. he used Rudy and his band of thieves. What does it take for you to see the truth?

Those drinking Trump's Kool-Aid are not interested in the truth...they are interested in adoring The Leader. If Trump gets re-elected, it is not beyond the realm of reason to suppose they will start giving him Nazi salutes...and yelling, "Heil, Trumpf!"
 
Smarter then Trump,Trump's a dumb fuck

Amazing how someone you consider a dumb fuck could kick the political ass of someone the black boy you hold in such high regard said was the most qualified to ever run for the office.
 
It must be horrible to be without her, Robo. I feel for you.

It’s the hardest thing I’ve ever had to face up to in my life Frank. Only God can heal my pain and reunite us. I look forward to that day.

They have found plenty. They have found that Trump is a pile of shit masquerading as a human. They have found that he is a menace to our Republic and to the world. They have found that he is willing to compromise America's security in favor of his personal benefit.

It’s apparent Frank that we have different sources of information. It would be nice old friend though if you could post some evidence for your proclamations. He’s a “menace to our Republic and the world” how Frank? Where and what have they found that proves “he’s willing to compromise America’s security in favor of his personal benefit” Frank? Who is “they” Frank?




The Trump sycophants do not want witnesses, Robo. Our side does.


Well Frank, if “your side,” really wants witnesses, why didn’t they subpoena them in their House hearings? Actually Frank the House has the “sole” authority to “impeach.” That means the “House” Frank has to make a case for removing a President & all civil officers of the United States. Read your Constitution Frank! The Senate has the sole authority to hear the House case and thereby the Senators are to be the jury to decide if a President or others should be removed from office as proven guilty by the House case presented. The Senate has no mandate to supply witnesses.

Look at the House witness list Frank. They claim they didn’t subpoena the Trump administration officers was because it would take too long to fight a Trump “Executive Privilege” claim in the courts, (a claim, by the way, Trump never made) he simply implied he would make that claim. Too long for what Frank? Why would they believe it would be quicker for the Senate to do it Frank? They don’t even believe they could win that court fight Frank! They don’t even know what those witnesses would say if they were to appear. You need to “know” or have strong suspicions based on facts Frank that those witnesses or documents have relevant evidence to present Frank, Where’s the evidence for that Frank?

I can plainly see why the Republicans don’t want any witnesses. They know there is no relevant impeach-able case to remove Trump. They know the evidence and witnesses that the House did present has more exculpatory evidence to favor Trump than to convict Trump. They know they, (the Republicans) can make a constitutional case that the House impeachment charges don’t even meet the constitutional requirements to impeach a President. Why would they want or need witnesses Frank? Why would they be that stupid Frank?
 
It I'm confused. Are you arguing for why our side does not want them (you said BOTH SIDES do not)...or are you arguing for the reasons why our side is fighting as hard as possible to get them?

Hey Frank, do you believe “your side” actually thinks the Senate can get the Trump “Executive Privilege” claim through the court before the election? Do you think they believe they can win that case in a Supreme Court with 5 Republican judges Frank? Think Frank! They simply want to force the Senate to prolong this farce all the way to the election to simply hold it over the head of Trump and smear him with it. It’s elementary my dear Frank!



I think the Republicans do not want any witnesses because they realize witnesses will just make the abomination look even more guilty than he already does...and he looks VERY guilty.

I also think many of the Republicans just want to vote for the abomination's acquittal...and then go home and take a VERY LONG shower. (I do not think they will ever get the stink off, though!)

I think the Republicans know “your side” Frank has a fat ZERO impeachment and removal case. I think they know there’s ZERO chance this President will be removed. I think your side has known that from the get go Frank! I think Nancy and her henchmen are just patronizing your party’s far communist left and your party’s mad rabid junkyard dog voters with their hair on fire Frank. I think it’s high time your Gestapo party give it up and face the fact that the Republicans are gonna win back the House and add even more Republicans to the Senate and Trump, (the best President of our lifetimes Frank), will be reelected by a gigantic landslide. Be prepared Frank!
 
It’s the hardest thing I’ve ever had to face up to in my life Frank. Only God can heal my pain and reunite us. I look forward to that day.

I hope the pain eases...but as we get older, pain does not seem to ease as quickly as when we were young.

It’s apparent Frank that we have different sources of information. It would be nice old friend though if you could post some evidence for your proclamations. He’s a “menace to our Republic and the world” how Frank? Where and what have they found that proves “he’s willing to compromise America’s security in favor of his personal benefit” Frank? Who is “they” Frank?

Going over all this stuff again and again and again...serves no purpose, Robo. Let's just leave it at we look at what is going on...and I see one thing and you another.

I see Trump as an existential threat to our nation and its institutions. Hundred, perhaps thousands, of op ed and editorial pieces have been written enumerating the issues that prompt that opinion...but I think we can agree that you will not see them as such.

Fine...your opinion is our opinion, just as mine is mine.

I listen to what Trump says and watch what he does...and I see incompetency, chaos, and classlessness.

Well Frank, if “your side,” really wants witnesses, why didn’t they subpoena them in their House hearings? Actually Frank the House has the “sole” authority to “impeach.” That means the “House” Frank has to make a case for removing a President & all civil officers of the United States. Read your Constitution Frank! The Senate has the sole authority to hear the House case and thereby the Senators are to be the jury to decide if a President or others should be removed from office as proven guilty by the House case presented. The Senate has no mandate to supply witnesses.

The Senate is mandated to TRY the charges. Doing that requires the documents and witnesses that are being asked for. If, as you seem to think, the House was deficient in their duty t obtain them...that does not relieve the Senate from its responsibility.

In my opinion, "the House didn't do it" is nothing more than an excuse to justify the Senate performing a pro forma trial.

In any case, an excellent case is being made that subpoena power for witnesses and documents will ultimately rest with the Chief Justice...and that the power of the Senate to overrule him is not as easily obtained as has been supposed.

We will see as the trial progresses.

Look at the House witness list Frank. They claim they didn’t subpoena the Trump administration officers was because it would take too long to fight a Trump “Executive Privilege” claim in the courts, (a claim, by the way, Trump never made) he simply implied he would make that claim. Too long for what Frank? Why would they believe it would be quicker for the Senate to do it Frank? They don’t even believe they could win that court fight Frank! They don’t even know what those witnesses would say if they were to appear. You need to “know” or have strong suspicions based on facts Frank that those witnesses or documents have relevant evidence to present Frank, Where’s the evidence for that Frank?

I can plainly see why the Republicans don’t want any witnesses. They know there is no relevant impeach-able case to remove Trump. They know the evidence and witnesses that the House did present has more exculpatory evidence to favor Trump than to convict Trump. They know they, (the Republicans) can make a constitutional case that the House impeachment charges don’t even meet the constitutional requirements to impeach a President. Why would they want or need witnesses Frank? Why would they be that stupid Frank?


We will see, Robo. We will see.
 
Back
Top