This big Democrat lie is coming back to bite them in the ass

Trump has an eye, and wallet, for beautiful women. Grown adult women. Women who are attracted to him. That's not abuse. Biden, on the other hand, likes little girls: children. Children who then try to get away from him.[/QUOT

Can you really do that? Trump said it clearly. https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/11/27/trump-accepted-hollywood-tape-orig-alee.cnn Are you able to totally ignore the evidence. trump is disgusting. He cheated on all his wives and is still doing it. He pays for sex, at least for silence. He is just a crude man who has no respect for women and uses them crudely. Damn OODA, can you really convince yourself of that premise?

19 women say Trump did exactly what he says he does. That OK for you?

Trump is now using a photo of his visit to one of the insured Parkland students to solicit campaign funds.
 
Not my theory. It is standard economic theory based in math. I made it simple enough. Demand creates hiring and expansion. Do you suspect that a company expands or hires because they are making more profits? If they are keeping up with demand, why would they hire more workers. C'mon think about it. Think they will hire workers to stand around? Nope, it is in response to demand and giving a ton of money to the owners does not change demand. Here is a link. https://www.spglobal.com/our-insigh...But-Rising-Debt-and-Tax-Reform-Pose-Risk.html They are sitting on 2 trillion and more. How is giving them another couple trillion going to change any thing?
,
What Trump will; accomplish. An incredible debt. He is slashing taxes and spending like a madman. Wants a wall, wants a huge kick in military spending, wants more on nukes , spend spend spend. Even a righty like you should be able to figure out what that will result in.

There's nothing "standard" about the theory that you choose to champion. You seem to think that Company X has no competitors to take market share from. Instead, they expand and drive down costs, increasing market share until Company Y does it better. Either way consumers benefit as well as workers.
 
If this is the case, which I doubt for most companies, nobody buries money in their mattress, as what would have to occur for your theory to hold water. Those owners would make other investments, upgrade their car or house, or throw their money out the window and buy a boat. Either way that money creates jobs.
This guy has zero clue ,multiple times in history, even today business has sat on trillions put away in mattresses, or banks with short term bonds for 1% . It wasn't used for hiring people that in a business sense would be stupid , you don't hire people to sit around when there is no increased demand for your product. These people have zero clue on economics , I know shit and I could bury this guy with facts on economics , that would only get a head scratch from him. Most of these slow minded people know shit. His comment being a prime example. Obama and Bush handed out almost a trillion dollars to bail out Bushes all but complete destruction of our economy and country. Business sat on that money and why wouldn't they, how do you increase demand by giving money to corporations , these people are idiots.
 
Competition has absolutely nothing to do with with it. If you are keeping up with demand, you do not hire. Just that easy. Expand when you don't have business? That is what you think? That would devastate a company. And another righty trying to tell me what I think. Sorry, you are wrong again. Why would you drive down costs? The days of capitalism are long gone. We have oligopolies now. They do not drive down costs. They assign areas that they do not compete in. They keep prices and profits as high as possible. That is how they max profits.

Competition is long gone. When I was young, we had price wars. stores provided great service and even competed on that.They spent money making better products. Oligopoly has essentially ended that. Competition is in the dust bin.
 
There's nothing "standard" about the theory that you choose to champion. You seem to think that Company X has no competitors to take market share from. Instead, they expand and drive down costs, increasing market share until Company Y does it better. Either way consumers benefit as well as workers.
Well another half pound of stupid. When did they do that in our history. What a joke. Demand is the only thing that drives markets.
 
The biggest joke here is his Title of this thread.": This big Democrat lie is coming back to bite them in the ass" It means nothing and this guy hasn't a clue that it doesn't , he actually thinks this silly crap has substance.
 
Competition has absolutely nothing to do with with it. If you are keeping up with demand, you do not hire. Just that easy. Expand when you don't have business? That is what you think? That would devastate a company. And another righty trying to tell me what I think. Sorry, you are wrong again. Why would you drive down costs? The days of capitalism are long gone. We have oligopolies now. They do not drive down costs. They assign areas that they do not compete in. They keep prices and profits as high as possible. That is how they max profits.

Competition is long gone. When I was young, we had price wars. stores provided great service and even competed on that.They spent money making better products. Oligopoly has essentially ended that. Competition is in the dust bin.
Why do the ones that know the least, try to cover up their stupidity by changing their response trying to throw out anything that has substance , They are repeating their buddies, you know tell a lie twice and people will believe it. Except the people that know better.
 
Why do the ones that know the least, try to cover up their stupidity by changing their response trying to throw out anything that has substance , They are repeating their buddies, you know tell a lie twice and people will believe it. Except the people that know better.

?????? what?
 
This guy has zero clue ,multiple times in history, even today business has sat on trillions put away in mattresses, or banks with short term bonds for 1% . It wasn't used for hiring people that in a business sense would be stupid , you don't hire people to sit around when there is no increased demand for your product. These people have zero clue on economics , I know shit and I could bury this guy with facts on economics , that would only get a head scratch from him. Most of these slow minded people know shit. His comment being a prime example. Obama and Bush handed out almost a trillion dollars to bail out Bushes all but complete destruction of our economy and country. Business sat on that money and why wouldn't they, how do you increase demand by giving money to corporations , these people are idiots.

I think you're the idiot here.
 
Like we started with . Corporate profits are at all time highs. https://www.cbpp.org/corporate-profits-are-at-an-all-time-high
These haters with there attack on Obamas economy during his presidency, the sin of GDP not going over 3 % increase annually. That fact was exactly what business always wants. During Obamas presidency, We had the highest corporate profits in history , the fastest increase of profit in history and the highest percentage of gross that was profit in history. and the stock market went up 178% and add in the highest GDP in history during Obamas presidency. That is so superior to any other president in our history and was so good that it probably will never be bettered. When would GDP not matter to big b. When you have the highest percentage of gross is profit in history, Make less product but have higher profits , the ultimate dream of big B. No wage increase to do it no jobs being offered and no extra expense but with increased production.
 
I just read an article about the CEO of Lowes Foods. Tell him that there's no competition.
Let me see, Some right wing CEO who was just handed a handful of money promotes the idea by saying what. Did he thank God and say what your leader said that he wouldn't be gaining anything from the tax cut to find out scum bag will gain about one billion on this tax cut. Clowns '
 
What I find amusing is that libs truly believe that their economic theory of taxing the rich not only works (it doesn't), but that there is no competing theory (or theories).
 
Let me see, Some right wing CEO who was just handed a handful of money promotes the idea by saying what. Did he thank God and say what your leader said that he wouldn't be gaining anything from the tax cut to find out scum bag will gain about one billion on this tax cut. Clowns '

I don't know if he's right wing or not, but thanks for self-identifying as yet one more lib-atheist.
 
I think you're the idiot here.
The only people that do think that are people that don't have a clue about economics , that's you buddy. I gave you a lesson on economics and if you would have listened you would have learned something you obviously don't know about. That lesson was easy because you know so little about the subject. I told You I could bury you with facts about economics and I also told you I know shit about it , but my shit is way more then what you have moving around in your head about this. Keep talking , your making a fool of yourself and that's a good thing.
 
I don't know if he's right wing or not, but thanks for self-identifying as yet one more lib-atheist.
This guy brilliant , now I'm a atheist, his mind is his biggest enemy. It shows every time he opens his mouth or pens a phrase.
 
Back
Top