Trump Administration moves to end legal marijuana.

zymurgy said:
did you know what you were saying when you said this?



or this?
Click to expand...
I stand by what I said, it has to do with the strain. Now, a good strain can develop seeds and it is still potent moreso than a strain that is a lower potency. I still agree with country.
 
countryboy said:
To perpetuate a breeding program. A small male plant is much easier to deal with, and only miniscule amounts of pollen are required.
Click to expand...

Since you are a bit out of the loop;
Breed perpetuation is through clone mothers.
One these days buys feminized seeds...
then grows a clone mother.
There us no need or value in male plants, especially since the law limits each grower to a small amount of plants, often six.
Why on earth would one want to give up such production for the sake of seeds which are so much more logically bought?
His question was bogus, another indicator that he is posing...he may have grown some weed but it was luck rathet than knowledge.
 
Covfefe said:
I stand by what I said, it has to do with the strain. Now, a good strain can develop seeds and it is still potent moreso than a strain that is a lower potency. I still agree with country.
Click to expand...

and I never once argued about the strain being the #1 factor

but both you and country boy argued for pages and pages about culling males.
 
zymurgy said:
"I have issues with inaccurate statements by posers."

talk about posers.

you seem very understanding of her complete bullshit, which was the entire fucking point here
Click to expand...

She is my friend and an exemplary human being. I always treat her with gentle understanding.
You, on the other hand, lost your shit over one of the kindest people in the world.
)That's when you fell onto my shitlist.
t
Now, feel free to fuck right off.
 
Covfefe said:
By calling you silly, lol, add hyper sensitive to that.
Click to expand...

yes, but this entire argument started from my completely accurate assessment that the common weed traded in the 70's was not seedless.

you also challenged the scientific notion that we do develop a tolerance to TCH

but rather then actually produce anything of a debate level by way of outside evidence, you name called.

not a "super moderator" in my book.
 
Rune said:
She is my friend and an exemplary human being. I always treat her with gentle understanding.
You, on the other hand, lost your shit over one of the kindest people in the world.
)That's when you fell onto my shitlist.
t
Now, feel free to fuck right off.
Click to expand...

lol. I really don't give a shit. I was met with level headed polite debate with name calling

so you both can fuck off at this point.
 
Covfefe said:
Rune, I grow, and I choose strains for their characteristics. Some are low THC and some are high THC. I know what I am talking about. A bad crop of Girl Scout Cookie with seeds is going to be better than a crop of seedless dirt weed.

I know now a strain of weed can be more potent or less potent due to growing conditions, but I also know that the strain has a great deal to do with the characteristics of the weed.
Click to expand...

Yes but you don't allow it to seed do you?
My point is just that if it is still good with seeds, it would be great without them.
 
Rune said:
Yes but you don't allow it to seed do you?
My point is just that if it is still good with seeds, it would be great without them.
Click to expand...

it doesn't sound like she keeps a male around.

introducing seeding via stress will produce bad seeds and less potent yield, so it is pretty clear she doesn't allow it to go to seed
 
Rune said:
Yes but you don't allow it to seed do you?
My point is just that if it is still good with seeds, it would be great without them.
Click to expand...
Then we agree, it’s better without seeds, of course, but a great strain can still be good even with seeds. The strain determines the potential for potency.
 
Rune said:
She is my friend and an exemplary human being. I always treat her with gentle understanding.
You, on the other hand, lost your shit over one of the kindest people in the world.
)That's when you fell onto my shitlist.
t
Now, feel free to fuck right off.
Click to expand...
Thanks Rune
 
Rune said:
That just proves your methodology was subpar.
Sorry.
I suggest further research.
Click to expand...

Sure, if the methodology of all the top growing minds in the world at the time, was subpar. Because that's where I gleaned most of my knowledge.
 
Rune said:
Since you are a bit out of the loop;
Breed perpetuation is through clone mothers.
One these days buys feminized seeds...
then grows a clone mother.
There us no need or value in male plants, especially since the law limits each grower to a small amount of plants, often six.
Why on earth would one want to give up such production for the sake of seeds which are so much more logically bought?
His question was bogus, another indicator that he is posing...he may have grown some weed but it was luck rathet than knowledge.
Click to expand...

Yes I am familiar with all of the new growing techniques. That doesn't mean there is no value in breeding your own strains, and there are plenty who still choose to do so. There is tremendous value in remaining on the down low, and in stealth. You leave quite a paper trail, or even a physical trail, when you purchase all of these newfangled seeds.
 
zymurgy said:
yes, but this entire argument started from my completely accurate assessment that the common weed traded in the 70's was not seedless.

you also challenged the scientific notion that we do develop a tolerance to TCH

but rather then actually produce anything of a debate level by way of outside evidence, you name called.

not a "super moderator" in my book.
Click to expand...
Who care what you think, I certainly don’t.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top