trump blames low-income people, minorities for 'ruining' suburbia

I asked what mainstream left-wing politicians do this, not what left-wing presidential candidates.

It’s all done at the local level so it’s not going to be names you recognize nationally. For California, Dianne Feinstein or Kamala Harris aren’t diving into this. Nor is Nancy Pelosi. It’s your local leaders or state level Congressional folks.
 
It’s all done at the local level so it’s not going to be names you recognize nationally. For California, Dianne Feinstein or Kamala Harris aren’t diving into this. Nor is Nancy Pelosi. It’s your local leaders or state level Congressional folks.

Can you name ANY on a local level that I could look up?
 
Hello StoneByStone,

Society wants it so badly that they're willing to vote for a mentally challenged criminal to make it happen.

And that tells us why it is never going to gain general acceptance. It's an extreme view. There's a reason they call things like that extreme. It's because they are not popular, too radical for the general public. The idea is actually very distasteful to most people. It will remain a fringe idea never taken seriously by the general public as it is now a fringe idea, and will continue to be.

Most Trump voters are not racists. They simply don't care much about the issue and are willing to overlook it if it gets them what they want, which is mostly, wealth. They really don't care about much else. They want low taxes and they don't care if it drives the entire USA bankrupt. Not their problem. They figure that wouldn't hurt them. They don't want to pay for the USA because they reason that all liberal programs should be cut while all conservative spending should be kept. They only want to pay for the conservative government spending and object to the liberal spending. So they refuse to fully fund the government with higher taxes on the rich, and they don't care if the government racks up trillions in additional debt, to support the rich who do not require support. It's insane.
 
Last edited:
And that tells us why it is never going to gain general acceptance. It's an extreme view. There's a reason they call things like that extreme. It's because they are not popular, too radical for the general public. The idea is actually very distasteful to most people. It will remain a fringe idea never taken seriously by the general public as it is now a fringe idea, and will continue to be.

But is it really fringe if it was popular enough to make Trump president? Especially considering how flawed Trump is?

Most Trump voters are not racists. They simply don't care much about the issue and are willing to overlook it if it gets them what they want, which is mostly, wealth. They really don't care about much else. They want low taxes and they don't care if it drives the entire USA bankrupt. Not their problem. They figure that wouldn't hurt them. They don't want to pay for the USA because they reason that all liberal programs should be cut while all conservative spending should be kept. They only want to pay for the conservative government spending and object to the liberal spending. So they refuse to fully fund the government with higher taxes on the rich, and they don't care if the government racks up trillions in additional debt, to support the rich who do not require support. It's insane.

So how come Conservatives didn't rally around any of the other Republicans running for president in 2016? They were all making the same promises about low taxes, cutting healthcare, restricting abortion, and so on. Trump's signature issue, the one that shot him to the front of the line, was the wall. I'm sure there were other factors in his popularity, such as him being so stupid, but there's no denying that the wall played a major role.
 
cheap shot lie, Bill......when asked if he condemned white supremacists he said sure........what Trump can't escape are lies from fuckwits such as yourself........

Sorry, I don't believe it is.

trump tells them what they want to hear & yet does not do it through his actions & words..

Thus necessitating his need to keep reiterating a denial.......

It is like this:

The Parable of the Two Sons

28 “What do you think? There was a man who had two sons. He went to the first and said, ‘Son, go and work today in the vineyard.’

29 “‘I will not,’ he answered, but later he changed his mind and went.

30 “Then the father went to the other son and said the same thing. He answered, ‘I will, sir,’ but he did not go.

31 “Which of the two did what his father wanted?”

:|
 
Back
Top