Trump Makes It Official...

I think of the moron AssHat as more of a xenophobe than a racist, but maybe I haven't paid close enough attention.
With him, it's hard to do.
 
Street Glider said:
Well, Trump has officially announced his candidacy, erasing any doubt if it ever really existed.

My concern is that his campaign will further fracture the GOP. He'll now go from being critical of our left-wing leaders, and he'll start attacking those within his own party, which will only hurt the conservative movement.

I fully expect DeSantis to run, and I expect him to conduct himself like the responsible leader he has proven himself to be during the campaign, and he'll do so without the level of personal attacks Trump is surely poised to make towards DeSantis...
Click to expand...

Trying to imagine what is squirming around in Trump's criminal mind, baffles even the brightest psychologists in the world. But, psychologists do not have criminal minds- and that is what it may take to crack this crack-a-doodle!

I'm no psychologist or a criminal, but I'm willing to take a closer look. I believe Donald Trump is running for president, and announcing now at this time, is because he thinks that, this is his only chance to throw all the open investigations on him into chaos.

In Trump's mind, he see's announcing his campaign for the 2024 presidential election, two years away from the election, as some kind of executive power, or a get-a-outta'-jail-Free-Card from the Justice Department.

But, here is the problem for his thinking that- THERE IS ONLY A BRIEF PERIOD WHERE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LAYS OFF INVESTIGATIONS, INDICTMENTS, and PROSECUTIONS FOR CANDIDATES RUNNING IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS- and that is 2 months before a Federal election- and UP TO ELECTION DAY! That is only a 2 month window that the Justice Department provides for.

And of course, should he actually win the 2024 election HEAVEN FORBID, HE KNOWS, the Democrats know, and his TRUMPTARDS all know that TRUMP WILL BE ABLE TO HIDE BEHIND EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE FOR another 4 years (LIKE HE DID LAST TIME) and be shielded from INDICTMENTS AND PROSECUTION!

He's free game to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law until that.

BUT- HERE IS THE TRUMP CARD- HE THINKS HE CAN STALL THE COURT SYSTEM WITH LAWSUITS UNTIL TWO MONTHS BEFORE THE ELECTION.

Actually, Trump's motives are very easy to understand! Donald Trump has figured out how to scam the system, and milk the system, so that his Criminality and crimes have a perpetual motion or certain autonomy to them.

TRUMPLARD thinks all the politically corrupted judges he has in place are still going to save him somehow- and he still feels like the potted plants he selected for the Supreme Court are going to toss him a favor somehow! Remember- "I'm just looking for 36,021 votes, one more than I have now"? Yes, we have always known what Donald Trump just wants- HE WANTS TO PUT HIMSELF ABOVE EVERYONE ELSE- BE ABLE TO CORRUPT EVERYTHING HE CAN GET HIS HANDS ON, PUT HIMSELF ABOVE THE LAW- AND ENRICH HIMSELF IN THE PROCESS!

THAT IS THE DONALD TRUMP WE ALL KNOW- TOO WELL!

And now that he has a campaign, Trump knows his parasites, who are still hopelessly in love with Trump, not so much Trump, but more of the love they have for the CHAOS and CORRUPTION that he BRINGS ALONG WITH HIM, will be sending in millions of dollars of Campaign donations- that he intends to laundry, and use for all of his attorney fees, court costs, penalties, and lawsuits!

Like I said, ONE has to think like a criminal- or someone completely void of morals and ethics, to understand his true motives.

Trumps-XRay-131918.jpg
 
Last edited:
Street Glider said:
I see. But it's perfectly fine when the federal government does it, right?

Hypocrite...
Click to expand...

The federal government never tricked foreigners into getting on a plane or lied to them about where they were going, promised them non-existent jobs, then just dumped them off with nowhere to go and not a clue as to what to do next.

Liar...

Street Glider said:
Please tell me you want to compare the extremism of the right to the extremism of the left.

Please, Holy Mother of God, tell me you want to do that...
Click to expand...

I'm not, because there really is no comparison.

Certainly not in terms of scale. A very small percentage of the left are extremist progressives who go around demanding and advocating for the silly shit we've seen out of them.

I know they exist, and I do not support their agenda, but they hold an infinitesimal amount of sway in the Democratic Party compared to the sway held by the Trumper lunatic cult, the QAnon Christian Nationalist goofballs and the white supremacists like The Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers and others.

Nowhere near the same thing.

Also, though the progressives may have extremist views on certain issues, their extremism is always in the form of the government giving too much, whereas the extremists on the right are solely concerned with the government taking things away.

Except for guns, of course.

The 2nd Amendment is the only right the right truly respects and has deep reverence for.

I disagree with the level of government handouts the progressives advocate, but at least their overreach is based in generosity rather than mean-spirited stinginess.

Which makes them better, more moral people than the a-holes of the right.
 
Street Glider said:
I don't have Trump confused with anyone.

I won't disagree that McConnell has to go, but Trump as already started going after the big dogs in the GOP, and there's just no way that ends well.
Click to expand...
GOOD! It is much needed, no matter how ugly it gets (and it WILL get much uglier). The corrupt RNC club needs to be utterly crushed and replaced by America First MAGA.

Street Glider said:
If Trump insists on attacking DeSantis,
Click to expand...
Does DeSantis insist on using his current $200M+ in globalist RNC club big donor war-chest of money for a Presidential run against Trump? If yes, then DeSantis deserves to be attacked as he at that point will have declared himself as an enemy of the America First movement.

Street Glider said:
there's no shortage of voters right in Florida who'll hold it against him in the General.
Click to expand...
True, but there's also no shortage of voters right in Florida who'll hold it against DeSantis for choosing to run against Trump, as it was Trump who got DeSantis into the governor's seat to begin with. Without Trump and his MAGA movement, there wouldn't've been any Governor DeSantis.

Street Glider said:
It's tough to win the Presidency without Florida...
Click to expand...
Even worse, it's impossible to win the Presidency without free and fair elections.


You are sadly WAYYYYYYY behind the times, since you still care about the "health of the GOP" and "needing particular states in order to win".

Democrats currently have 270+ "electoral votes" in their pockets right now due to their fraudulent (s)elections in key states. Due to this, there is literally NO viable path for Republicans to win the Presidency or any statewide office in key states. That's partly why we need Trump rather than anyone else as the nominee, as he will continue to be our voice against all of these corrupt institutions which are behind the removal of free and fair elections in this country.

Key states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, and a number of others (such as Washington, Oregon, Minnesota, and even Wisconsin to a lesser extent for the moment, as well as the dictatorship of California and the oligarchy of New York) will NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER see another Republican win at the state (or former-state) level EVER again unless and until Republicans start embracing the "new normal" of going solely after ballots rather than going after voters, and getting those ballots collected as early as possible, rather than allowing Democrats to largely separate their own early harvested ballots from election day Republican voters' ballots which Dems can then adjudicate or otherwise disenfranchise via shoddy corrupt machinery.

Those states that I mentioned above are all completely lost atm with regard to election integrity, thus the strategy of going after voters in those states will always be a losing strategy until Republicans can steal power back and make the necessary changes in order to turn (s)elections back into elections.


This is a war, and we need Trump at the helm to fight it. DeSantis is not the man for this particular job, nor is anyone else. It is Trump all the way.
 
Street Glider said:
....Please tell me you want to compare the extremism of the right to the extremism of the left.

Please, Holy Mother of God, tell me you want to do that...
Click to expand...
Yes, please tell me how you compare the extremism on the right to that on the left.

FWIW, all violent or criminal people should face justice. The problem with you is that you seek to justify RW violence by finger-pointing at LW violence.

Are you equating the violence in Portland, a local police issue, with the attack on the Capitol on 1/6?

You're already on record supporting Trump, supporting White Nationalist ideology and your racism as quoted previously and posted Here: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...than-an-angry-White-man&p=4801088#post4801088

7108gw.jpg
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Close enough. LOL

Article 117 applies to both of us equally, son, if we were prosecuted under it. I'll be happy to wager my guilt is far less than yours over the past few days. :thup:
Click to expand...

Again, your ignorance of the law is astounding.

Even if your guilt was less than mine, we could both go to prison for 6 months under the UCMJ for doing it.

Are you prepared to do that?

Fine. Again, it would take an act of Congress to change the law, but stripping traitors of their veterans benefits and pensions would be an easy sell after a major White Supremacist terrorist attack.
Click to expand...

I would have no problem at all removing all pay and benefits from someone who conducts such an attack.

But merely being a white supremacist, as revolting as that is, should not result in someone losing all of their retirement benefits. Next thing you know, someone would want to do the same to all NAMBLA members and you'd lose everything...

The only people who think I'm stupid are WSE members and others seeking to overthrow our Constitution, son.
Click to expand...

Along with any sane, rational individual who reads your bullshit.

The people who take issue with what I say all beat women...

See, numbnuts? I can do it, too...

Nice racist rant. It's comments like those which prove you are a racist and white supremacist.
Click to expand...

Properly identifying a group of people for what they are isn't racist.

How many whites did you see burning our cities to the ground in 2020? It may be cultural, it may be the way they're raised, but it's not a racist comment to say that blacks have definitely show a fer greater propensity for violence than whites.

Believing otherwise is stupid...
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Yes, please tell me how you compare the extremism on the right to that on the left.
Click to expand...

When the left wants no limits on abortion, that's extremism.

When the left wants you to believe that a biological male can compete fairly on a woman's swim teram, that's extremism.

When the left believes that it's okay to let a grown mad use a ladies room because he identifies as a woman, that's extremism.

When the left demands more laws targeting law abiding citizens as opposed to criminals, that's extremism.

When the left wants to take pre-school children to a drag show and tell them it's "normal", that's extremism.

I could go on, but I'm bored...

FWIW, all violent or criminal people should face justice. The problem with you is that you seek to justify RW violence by finger-pointing at LW violence.
Click to expand...

Says the douchebag who just said "I'll be happy to wager my guilt is far less than yours".

Your propensity for hypocrisy is truly fascinating...

Are you equating the violence in Portland, a local police issue, with the attack on the Capitol on 1/6?
Click to expand...

How stupid are you?

I've mentioned neither. The intelligent individual (read: NOT YOU) would understand that in order to compare them, I would need to talk about them...
 
Street Glider said:
Again, your ignorance of the law is astounding.

Even if your guilt was less than mine, we could both go to prison for 6 months under the UCMJ for doing it.

Are you prepared to do that?

I would have no problem at all removing all pay and benefits from someone who conducts such an attack.

But merely being a white supremacist, as revolting as that is, should not result in someone losing all of their retirement benefits. Next thing you know, someone would want to do the same to all NAMBLA members and you'd lose everything...


Along with any sane, rational individual who reads your bullshit.

The people who take issue with what I say all beat women...

See, numbnuts? I can do it, too...

Properly identifying a group of people for what they are isn't racist.

How many whites did you see burning our cities to the ground in 2020? It may be cultural, it may be the way they're raised, but it's not a racist comment to say that blacks have definitely show a fer greater propensity for violence than whites.

Believing otherwise is stupid...
Click to expand...

Yes. If it puts away you and other WSEs demeaning our service and attacking our nation, I'd do it. :thup:

Add "or materially supports WSEs" and we're in agreement. Thanks for the 12B violation. It suits your nature, son. :thup:
No, I'm not a pedophile nor a member of NAMBLA.
 
Street Glider said:
When the left wants no limits on abortion, that's extremism.

When the left wants you to believe that a biological male can compete fairly on a woman's swim teram, that's extremism.

When the left believes that it's okay to let a grown mad use a ladies room because he identifies as a woman, that's extremism.

When the left demands more laws targeting law abiding citizens as opposed to criminals, that's extremism.

When the left wants to take pre-school children to a drag show and tell them it's "normal", that's extremism.

I could go on, but I'm bored...



Says the douchebag who just said "I'll be happy to wager my guilt is far less than yours".

Your propensity for hypocrisy is truly fascinating...



How stupid are you?

I've mentioned neither. The intelligent individual (read: NOT YOU) would understand that in order to compare them, I would need to talk about them...
Click to expand...

Son, get a fucking grip. All of those are First Amendment issues. While I disagree with most of them, like Voltaire once wrote, I defend their right to have those opinions.

The facts remain true:
1) you support White Nationalist ideology.
2) You're a racist.
3) You believe violence is the answer to our nation's problems.
 
Street Glider said:
Why would I believe that?

I said I was retired military and you didn't believe me. So, if you say something why on earth would I believe you?
Click to expand...

For one thing, dumbass, it's not against the rules to call someone a fucking liar or an idiot.

Are you really so fucking stupid you didn't read the rules you agreed to when you signed up on this forum, son? How is anyone supposed to accept you are a millionaire businessman with a hot Puerto Rican GF and a retired PO1 when you're too fucking stupid to read and abide by the rules?

Here, let me help you pull your head out of your ass Petty Officer Glider: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?2-Rules-of-the-Board!&p=2#post2
12. Rule 12 - Limits on sexual content:


12(a) - No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc. We especially DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another member and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids of members being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, members being called pedophiles, suggesting members may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

12(c) - Language that is sexually violent (e.g. rape/incest/graphic sex details that simply go 'too far') and/or is used in a manner to harass other users may be removed at moderator discretion without notice or apology, and could end up resulting in a ban if we get tired of repeatedly having to edit posts made by the same individuals over and over.
Click to expand...

The good news, dumbass, is that you'll probably get off with a warning. Do it again and you might have a short vacation. LOL
 
Last edited:
Nordberg said:
Illogical.
Click to expand...
Not at all.

Nordberg said:
He is cleansing the party not tearing it down,
Click to expand...
Correct.

Nordberg said:
then you say a civil war within the party .
Click to expand...
Yup. RINOs vs MAGA.

Nordberg said:
That is certainly tearing it down.
Click to expand...
Nope. That is cleansing the party of RINOs so that only MAGA remains.

Nordberg said:
The Repub party is done with Trump.
Click to expand...
... and Trump (and MAGA) are done with the Republican Party (specifically the RINOs within it and controlling it). Hence, the upcoming "big ugly".

Nordberg said:
he is a dangerous ,stupid, corrupt person who should spend the rest of his life in courts.
Click to expand...
Are you describing Fauci? Biden? Schumer?
 
gfm7175 said:
Not at all.


Correct.


Yup. RINOs vs MAGA.


Nope. That is cleansing the party of RINOs so that only MAGA remains.


... and Trump (and MAGA) are done with the Republican Party (specifically the RINOs within it and controlling it). Hence, the upcoming "big ugly".


Are you describing Fauci? Biden? Schumer?
Click to expand...

The MAGAs are the traitors.
 
Damocles said:
They believe the mid term results mean that people really like them. You shouldn't disabuse them of this notion. Though I will tell you that Trump will bring out the crazies to vote against him if he is the nominee. Giving them Trump to run on can make it very difficult to win as a republican running in 2024.
Click to expand...

Not true. We don't think the midterm proves anyone "really likes" Democrats. What the midterms proved is that American voters like the GOP Nazi party less.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top