Trump-Stormy Daniels settlement at heart of potential NY DA indictment didn't violate

PostmodernProphet said:
and what is it about that which leads you to conclude there's a difference?......can you be specific, naming the elements of the crime and distinguishing the state law from the federal law?.....oh wait, you don't know what those words mean, do you.......
Click to expand...

You said there are illegal leaks? Tell us more? Tell us about it... Lets start with, What leaks?
 
ExpressLane said:
So you actually think CNN did not deduct their NDA with the kid? Man are you an idiot! Move along you are too dumb for me to spend time with. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO. I didn't realize that the head of CNN was paying hush money for sex with a 17 year old so his wife wouldn't find out.

NDAs do not come with a payment. NDAs are to keep a payment secret. In reality the majority of business NDAs involve no money since they are signed to protect trade secrets.
 
ExpressLane said:
Yep

"but was allowed to plead down to misdemeanor petty larceny rap and walked out without any jail time,"
Click to expand...

So the guy plead guilty and you are complaining that they got a conviction?

Because they charged someone with a crime, then plead it down to a lower level crime means they shouldn't charge someone else with a crime? Do you realize how stupid you sound?
When they don't offer Trump a deal to plead guilty to a lesser crime after being indicted, then you could use this as an example of unfair treatment.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
and what is it about that which leads you to conclude there's a difference?......can you be specific, naming the elements of the crime and distinguishing the state law from the federal law?.....oh wait, you don't know what those words mean, do you.......
Click to expand...

You said there are illegal leaks? Tell us more? Tell us about it... Lets start with, What leaks?

Just more lies from you? As a Trumpper I know you lie a lot.
 
ExpressLane said:
It is obvious someone leaked to Trump.
Click to expand...
Leaked or his lawyers were given the heads up. It isn’t illegal for the DA to contact the attorneys of a high profile person such as Trump because there are special circumstances in arresting a former President. Remember, this is new to everyone.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
So the guy plead guilty and you are complaining that they got a conviction?

Because they charged someone with a crime, then plead it down to a lower level crime means they shouldn't charge someone else with a crime? Do you realize how stupid you sound?
When they don't offer Trump a deal to plead guilty to a lesser crime after being indicted, then you could use this as an example of unfair treatment.
Click to expand...
Not to the crime he actually committed.

If a guy raped your daughter would you want him to plea down to pinching her butt? Would you say but he did plea to something? I doubt it. But then again you may just be that stupid. :dunno: :laugh:
 
Phantasmal said:
Leaked or his lawyers were given the heads up. It isn’t illegal for the DA to contact the attorneys of a high profile person such as Trump because there are special circumstances in arresting a former President. Remember, this is new to everyone.
Click to expand...
I'm sure that Bragg is trying to be helpful.

:facepalm:
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
ROFLMAO.. NY law states that targets of a grand jury may be given the opportunity to testify if they so desire. Nothing was leaked to Trump. It would appear he was informed and given the opportunity to testify.
http://www.nyjuror.gov/pdfs/hb_Grand.pdf
https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/criminal-procedure-law/cpl-sect-190-50/
Click to expand...

The grand jury is still hearing testimony today so has not voted to indict Trump. Trump won't be arrested without an indictment.
 
arq-2ulmc7_t3-jpg.1232897
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top