Wow. You begin with a simple repetition fallacy
Fallacy fallacy. Responding to a repetition is not itself a repetition.
(Covid19 does not kill, repeated may make it seem real to you, but it certainly did kill many folks,
Covid19 does not kill. NONE of the covid/SARS series of viruses so far discovered kill.
and like even complications form simple colds can kill folks so can complications from Covid19 today),
Dying from something else is not dying from covid19. If you want to go THERE, consider:
A mild cold does not kill. It can cause pneumonia though, which certainly CAN kill. Indeed, ANY respiratory virus can do this, including any covid/SARS series virus, including covid19.
A car does not kill. A driver can kill using a car, though.
Funeral homes did NOT record a marked increase in bodies to process during the whole Covid19 fear mongering. In my own county, people falling off of ladders and the like were ALL listed as 'covid deaths'. Why? Money.
The mRNA vaccine forced upon people HAS caused some cardiac problems, sometimes resulting in death.
Masks forced upon people did nothing, as N95 dust masks are completely ineffective against viruses. They are also not designed for long term use. Wearing such masks long term (or other similar covering) DOES increase risk of bacteriological and fungal infections (some of which can be quite dangerous). The N95 specification backs me up on this. These are DUST MASKS. The cheap masks coming out of China didn't even meet THAT specification. Most of the time their packaging even lists the warning.
The Church of Covid is a fundamentalist style religion. Don't fall for it. It depends on two paradoxes:
Paradox M:
1) I wear a mask to protect myself from Covid19.
2) I demand YOU wear a mask because mine doesn't work.
Paradox V:
1) I get the Covid19 'vaccine' (it isn't a vaccine) to protect myself from Covid19.
2) I demand YOU get the 'vaccine' because mine doesn't work.
then progress from that fallacy on.
Fallacy fallacy. Semantics fallacy.
You and I often agree, but listing supposed "fallacies" during conversations (yes, here we may type our responses, but this is conversational, not thematic writing) is not participating in the conversation in any useful way.
A fallacy is not a conversation. It is an error in logic. You cannot form a valid argument out of a fallacy.
List the fallacies you think exist, then back it up with an explanation at the very least, then give a reasonable response.
I have.
You wound up with a "fruit of the poisoned tree" fallacy in your post because you began with and extended from the repetition fallacy.
Fallacy fallacy. I have already explained why.