Trump's are 2 Types of supporters ... which one are you?

Rich people don't rent homes- they buy them.

They buy them to rent them out.

It's why NYC, SF, LA, and Seattle have housing problems. Nowhere is that better seen than in Manhattan.

This is what I mean when I say you're full of shit and are lying about yourself on the internet so you can lend your argument credibility, authority, and sympathy it doesn't inherently have.


There are very few homes in my area that are rented, if any. Rich people don't rent out their vacation homes because they don't want low lifes touching their stuff.

You're a liar and a phony. You catfish people in order to make you feel better about yourself.
 
Again, if I got them off Google then you can too. A simple right click....

Googling images is just one way you catfish someone. There are other ways. Maybe you pulled the image off a Google search. Maybe you were someone who worked at the home, but didn't own it, but you wanted people to think you did so you could be more important. Maybe you have a friend who does own the home, and you took pictures of it and tried to pass it off as you. It's like that kid in high school that kept the photo-insert in his wallet to pretend it was his "girlfriend from Canada". Again, not my first rodeo with people misrepresenting themselves. Caught Ashley Todd, caught Sam (Joe) Wurzelbacher (The Plumber), caught Julie Boonstra. All three of them were about as good at lying as you.


I never aid that I live in the Blue Ridge all year 'round. It's my weekend home.....

Right, you say this now once you read what I had already written about Blue Ridge.

How is it that I know more about Blue Ridge than you, and I only visit there on weekends sometimes?
 
In the blue ridge mountains, sure! There are some really nice vacation rentals up there; but they're vacation rentals, and the owners of those homes spend less time there than you do at the dentist.

Again, rich people don't rent their homes. I sure as hell won't. You don't know what you're talking about.
 
Googling images is just one way you catfish someone. There are other ways. Maybe you pulled the image off a Google search. Maybe you were someone who worked at the home, but didn't own it, but you wanted people to think you did so you could be more important.




Right, you say this now once you read what I had already written about Blue Ridge.

How is it that I know more about Blue Ridge than you, and I only visit there on weekends sometimes?

It's already been proven that you know next to nothing about the Blue Ridge.

Come on Mr. Google- show me the images that I posted of "my" homes are in the public domain.
 
The "preponderance of evidence" now suggests that you know that I'm right and that you are too embarrassed to admit your fail.

No it doesn't. There is no "preponderance of evidence" those pictures are genuine, yours, or of what you're pretending them to be.

Like I said, not my first rodeo when it comes to Conservatives lying about their credentials. Like Ashley Todd, Sam Wurzelbacher, and Julie Boonstra, you're not convincing.
 
Then you should have no problem accepting my challenge. But you won't because you know that I have won.

Well, no, because you refuse to provide your basic info. So I can't certify your claims -no one can, and you know that, which is why you make them.
 
They buy them to rent them out.

It's why NYC, SF, LA, and Seattle have housing problems. Nowhere is that better seen than in Manhattan.

This is what I mean when I say you're full of shit and are lying about yourself on the internet so you can lend your argument credibility, authority, and sympathy it doesn't inherently have.




You're a liar and a phony. You catfish people in order to make you feel better about yourself.

They buy the shitty homes and condos to rent them out.

Rich folks in my 'hood never rent their fine homes out.
 
Well, no, because you refuse to provide your basic info. So I can't certify your claims -no one can, and you know that, which is why you make them.

Basic info is the "fingerprint" pattern of the brickwork on the front of my fine "city" home.
 
Again, rich people don't rent their homes. I sure as hell won't. You don't know what you're talking about.

Of course they rent their homes! The rental income supplements whatever income they have. What rich person leaves money on the table, particularly when you buy a nice home in the Blue Ridge mountains? No one is retiring up there because it's all poor white trash.

Wow man.

Now I'm really convinced you're catfishing people.
 
No it doesn't. There is no "preponderance of evidence" those pictures are genuine, yours, or of what you're pretending them to be.

Like I said, not my first rodeo when it comes to Conservatives lying about their credentials. Like Ashley Todd, Sam Wurzelbacher, and Julie Boonstra, you're not convincing.

Surely you can't be this dim.
 
Of course they rent their homes! The rental income supplements whatever income they have. What rich person leaves money on the table, particularly when you buy a nice home in the Blue Ridge mountains? No one is retiring up there because it's all poor white trash.

Wow man.

Now I'm really convinced you're catfishing people.

No they don't. Again, they don't want renters near their stuff. No one sleeps in my bed except me and my hot wife.

:D
 
It's already been proven that you know next to nothing about the Blue Ridge.

Well, here's the thing; you didn't say you spent only your weekends up in Blue Ridge. You were pretending that you spent all your time there with your fellow rich people in your gated community, or whatever.

After I pointed out that the people who actually live in Blue Ridge are mostly poor white trash, that's when your story started to change. That's when suddenly this home you were passively representing as your primary residence was just in fact your weekend residence. See, you deliberately spoke in vague terms so you could wiggle yourself around the parameters later down the road. Only, you ended up tangling with someone who has a degree in Journalism and understands exactly what kind of bullshit you're pulling.

So you pull up your stakes and declare victory when all you have to go on are photos that may or may not have come from you, that may or may not be what you claim to be, that may or may not even be real.

It's almost exactly what Sam Wurzelbacher did when we exposed him for misrepresenting himself as "Joe the Plumber" just so he could lure Obama into saying something on the campaign trail to use out of context later on.

Pathetic and not even original.
 
They buy the shitty homes and condos to rent them out.

They buy vacation homes too, dingus. Then they register their homes with a vacation rental company like Escape to Blue Ridge or Blue Sky Cabin Rentals, and sit back and collect the fees after giving the rental company a share.


Rich folks in my 'hood never rent their fine homes out.

1. I don't believe you own a home.

2. I don't believe you know any rich people other than those who you probably did work for on their homes.

3. I've seen this pattern of behavior before, and it wasn't clever then. It's not clever now.
 
Hello Bourbon,

1529330907-df-ptcpwkaa9lts.jpg

No, I disagree.

This is just as disingenuous as the propaganda of the Right Wing Spin Machine.

There are a lot of good people who voted for Trump and defend their votes.

They have their reasons and they are not stupid people, nor are they billionaires.

What about all the millionaires who voted for Trump?

And then there are a lot of people who didn't so much vote for Trump as they voted against Hillary.

You know the Right Wing Propaganda Machine really did a number on her.

Even Hillary said only half of Trump voters fit into the Basket Of Deplorables.
 
They buy vacation homes too, dingus. Then they register their homes with a vacation rental company like Escape to Blue Ridge or Blue Sky Cabin Rentals, and sit back and collect the fees after giving the rental company a share.




1. I don't believe you own a home.

2. I don't believe you know any rich people other than those who you probably did work for on their homes.

3. I've seen this pattern of behavior before, and it wasn't clever then. It's not clever now.


Blah, blah, blah. You keep repeating the same thing. Fess up and prove yourself.
 
Well, here's the thing; you didn't say you spent only your weekends up in Blue Ridge. You were pretending that you spent all your time there with your fellow rich people in your gated community, or whatever.

After I pointed out that the people who actually live in Blue Ridge are mostly poor white trash, that's when your story started to change. That's when suddenly this home you were passively representing as your primary residence was just in fact your weekend residence. See, you deliberately spoke in vague terms so you could wiggle yourself around the parameters later down the road. Only, you ended up tangling with someone who has a degree in Journalism and understands exactly what kind of bullshit you're pulling.

So you pull up your stakes and declare victory when all you have to go on are photos that may or may not have come from you, that may or may not be what you claim to be, that may or may not even be real.

It's almost exactly what Sam Wurzelbacher did when we exposed him for misrepresenting himself as "Joe the Plumber" just so he could lure Obama into saying something on the campaign trail to use out of context later on.

Pathetic and not even original.

Theories, theories....
 
Basic info is the "fingerprint" pattern of the brickwork on the front of my fine "city" home.

And you have no way of proving that is yours unless you reveal your actual name. Which you won't do because doing so would expose you as lying to everyone here. And your ego cannot take that hit.

So now we're in circular reasoning territory with you:

I am rich and own a home.
Prove it.
Here's a photo.
How do I know this is yours?
Take my word for it.
No.
I'm rich and own a home.
I don't believe you.
Here's a photo.
This is the same photo from before.
How could it not be mine if you can see the signature?
How do we know that's your signature?
I can't prove that beyond a reasonable doubt.
::facepalm::
 
Back
Top