Trump's best photograph

AProudLefty said:
Just don't do it again. ;)

It's up to the mods. Apparently it got deleted by a mod.
Click to expand...

Yes, I tried to delete it after you mentioned it was verboten, but I was too late.

As an act of penance, I will give myself a time out from posting.

I will see you all later after I feel I am suitably remorseful.
 
Trumpy said:
I have been chastened and will only send you such images, should they be necessary to make a point, by IM.

Or would that be a bannable offense, too?
Click to expand...

I doubt it unless it is reported.

You can make a point without posting explicit images though.

The sex trafficking is very well known. And Trump is associated with Epstein. Does that mean anything? I do not know.
 
Trumpy said:
Yes, I tried to delete it after you mentioned it was verboten, but I was too late.

As an act of penance, I will give myself a time out from posting.

I will see you all later after I feel I am suitably remorseful.
Click to expand...

LOL. Don't worry. You're new to this site. I, myself, have been warned for posting sexually explicit images. I've learned since.
 
Trumpy said:
And even though we knew all about those mutually agreed upon arrangements, we still elected him.

What do you think America would do or say if they knew all of Biden's scandals?
Click to expand...

TBH, even I was glad Trump beat Hillary even though I never voted for either of them nor Biden. Without a doubt, the nation would have been far better off if Trump tossed a lateral pass to Pence in late 2017 and resigned. Trump would have remained a RW hero to this day instead of a wannabe dictator whose end will not be pretty.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
TBH, even I was glad Trump beat Hillary even though I never voted for either of them nor Biden. Without a doubt, the nation would have been far better off if Trump tossed a lateral pass to Pence in late 2017 and resigned. Trump would have remained a RW hero to this day instead of a wannabe dictator whose end will not be pretty.
Click to expand...

Pence would have been the most boring president in history but I'd be glad to have him over Trump. That's pretty weird.
 
AProudLefty said:
I doubt it unless it is reported.

You can make a point without posting explicit images though.

The sex trafficking is very well known. And Trump is associated with Epstein. Does that mean anything? I do not know.
Click to expand...

If a mod caught it and deleted it, then it's up for discussion. It takes a majority (or unanimous?) vote to ban people...even though whiners bitch that's not true 5 or 6 years ago. Such voting means all have to be logged on so it could be quick or could take 24 hours.

What was the picture of?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
If a mod caught it and deleted it, then it's up for discussion. It takes a majority (or unanimous?) vote to ban people...even though whiners bitch that's not true 5 or 6 years ago.

What was the picture of?
Click to expand...

It's a picture of two pictures with Hunter being in bed with what appears to be a young girl on the left and what clearly to be a picture of some guy being led by a girl in two pieces bikini to a bed on the right. I assume the latter was taken on Epstein's island.
 
AProudLefty said:
It's a picture of two pictures with Hunter being in bed with what appears to be a young girl on the left and what clearly to be a picture of some guy being led by a girl in two pieces bikini to a bed on the right. I assume the latter was taken on Epstein's island.
Click to expand...

Were they explicit? If not, then I think he's okay unless he drew a direct line between them and a JPP member.

When Ghislaine releases the Trump videos, how many of the Qless will start pleading for lowering the age of consent to 13?
 
Trumpy said:
490efb19e00f7434c8caf730a0742225.jpg


Here are agents of the government posing as patriot protesters who helped advance the pre-planned Leftist agendas to make J6 into a media replay of 9/11.

Shiny, govt. shoes. IFB in their ears. Bogus ham handed T shirts.
Click to expand...

So let me get this straight; There was no Insurrection except for the one full of Antifa, BLM and FBI operatives? Just like Parler?
qpoJR5a.gif


4qzpx1.jpg
 
AProudLefty said:
Well they blur out the guy's penis on the right. But it is very suggestive. The girl on the right looks around 6 or 7.
Click to expand...

It's not nudity if blurred. Suggestive pics are one thing that's not verboten.

IMO, there's the written word and then there's precedent. By letting hundreds of posts about "Pedo Joe" to go unmolested**, then it would be unfair to punish others for doing the same about other public figures.

At this point, IMO, the only firm rule is NO DRAWING CONNECTIONS TO MEMBERS in any way, shape or form. I could be wrong. Trumpy will find out by tomorrow, but I'm betting, based on descriptions, he's okay. Maybe a warning to "Don't do that" or "Your picture has been removed".

12. Rule 12 - Limits on sexual content:

12(a) - No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

12(c) - Language that is sexually violent (e.g. rape/incest/graphic sex details that simply go 'too far') and/or is used in a manner to harass other users may be removed at moderator discretion without notice or apology, and could end up resulting in a ban if we get tired of repeatedly having to edit posts made by the same individuals over and over.



**Yes, I intended that. ;)
 
Dutch Uncle said:
It's not nudity if blurred. Suggestive is one thing that's not verboten. IMO, there's the written word and then there's precedent. By letting hundreds of posts about "Pedo Joe" to go unmolested**, then it would be unfair to punish others for doing the same about other public figures.

At this point, IMO, the only firm rule is NO DRAWING CONNECTIONS TO MEMBERS in any way, shape or form. I could be wrong. Trumpy will find out by tomorrow.

12. Rule 12 - Limits on sexual content:

12(a) - No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

12(c) - Language that is sexually violent (e.g. rape/incest/graphic sex details that simply go 'too far') and/or is used in a manner to harass other users may be removed at moderator discretion without notice or apology, and could end up resulting in a ban if we get tired of repeatedly having to edit posts made by the same individuals over and over.



**Yes, I intended that. ;)
Click to expand...

Well it's a screenshot of a video of ACTUAL child abuse. It's like if someone posts a real CP, but with parts cut out or blurred out, it gets a pass.

And that girl was a REAL victim in the process of being abused.
 
AProudLefty said:
Just don't do it again. ;)

It's up to the mods. Apparently it got deleted by a mod.
Click to expand...

No harm/no foul. Phantasmal deleted it and they understand the rule violation. We'll consider that his warning.

You can talk about Biden's son's sexual proclivity, posting images is where we draw that line. Another way to run foul of that rule is to suggest that one of our members is a pedophile.
 
Damocles said:
No harm/no foul. Phantasmal deleted it and they understand the rule violation. We'll consider that his warning.

You can talk about Biden's son's sexual proclivity, posting images is where we draw that line. Another way to run foul of that rule is to suggest that one of our members is a pedophile.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the clarification.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
I thought it was a lamp shade but it appears to be a chef's hat. You can see another one, slightly different, on the back row a few feet away.

https://www.escoffier.edu/blog/culinary-arts/the-history-of-the-chefs-hat/
The hat itself can be used to symbolize the prowess of the chef. Traditionally, the chef’s hat was meant to have 100 pleats, symbolizing 100 different ways to cook an egg. Today, there might not actually be 100 pleats in a chef’s hat, but the symbolism still stands. Other aspects of the hat can be symbolic: For example, in some kitchens, the chefs with the highest rank have the tallest hats. Different hat styles may also be used to distinguish roles in the kitchen.
Click to expand...

You'd have to be pretty tall to tower over Melania in her 5" heels. :laugh:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top