Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
Well, thank God for that. ID is meant to be a school of philosophy whereas creationism would be a theology course. They are worlds apart, but it still is not a school of science, I agree. What philosophy often tends to do is demonstrate the limits of science, like when that moron David Hume told us that we cannot trust our senses and therefore can never know what is real.No, not because of you, because I could tell that it was just more of Asshat's history.
The "conspiratorial" view of history is no more a real, legitimate school of history than intelligent design is a school of biology. It's both made up with people with an agenda, with no interest in proving their claims, wanting to shove it into schools first instead of put it through the fair peer review process.
As an example, scientific law states that matter is neither created nor destroyed, but merely changes form. And yet, there exists a Big Rip Theory which states that the Universe will unravel and all matter will cease to exist. And again, any theory that speaks of origins is also breaking that law.
I find myself constantly surprised at people who cannot separate evolution from the Big Bang. They are not the same thing, and belief in evolution does not validate the other theory. Nor does believing in a giant cosmic explosion prove anything, since it takes faith to accept. Either way, I can't understand Fundamentalists who feel threatened by science...