U.S. "Arctic Outbreak" this week signals the End of Global Warming

Bigdog said:
No. The Milankovitch cycles do NOT predict glaciation cycles, anymore.

The Oceans are the largest heat sink. We can not measure how much heat they contain. We can't even map the deep ocean currents.

NASA can NOT even measure insulation and reflectivity of the Earth's cloud coverage. They just fudge the numbers to get the desired computer results.
Click to expand...
Heat is not contained in anything. Heat has no location. Deep ocean currents are easily mapped by submarines. Clouds are not insulation.
 
Cypress said:
^° I know you didn't come up with this on your own. Link me to the peer reviewed source you got this information from, and where in the article it says these observations disprove or falsify the scientific consensus on global warming.
Click to expand...
Science does not use consensus, Sybil. There is no voting bloc in science. Science has no politics or religion.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
 
Nomad said:
BigN4Tdog thinks that because he once worked as a janitor in the science building at the local community college, that he's qualified to understand and comment on subjects that are as far beyond his understanding as they are to an actual dog.
Click to expand...
Science is not a college, building, or university.
 
Into the Night said:
The age of the Earth is unknown.
Click to expand...
Hilarious !

I'm going to add this to your list of proclamations, if that's OK

These are recent ' Into the Nightsoil's' statements ;

"Sweden is not to the east of the UK "
" There is no such science as paleoclimatology "
" There is no such thing as an unwritten Constitution "
" There were WMD in Iraq "
"There is no "weaponization of the dollar"
"Covid does not kill ."
"It is not possible to have a variant of a variant. "(Subvariants do not exist )
"Israel doesn't want to eradicate Palestine "
"The Arctic isn't melting "
"I don't need to seek attention"
"The age of the earth is unknown "

Dumbass or troll ?
Both.

 
Yakuda said:
That or the one climate nut who had more than two brain cells realized "global warming" wasn't selling anymore not people with common sense. You people do this ALL THE TIME you change the meaning of words to meet the situation. I remember when vaccines prevented diseases not any more
Click to expand...
No vaccine prevents infection.
Vaccines can mitigate what happens when you get infected with that virus, but that's all.

Otherwise you are correct.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You really going to adopt Into the Night's idiot argument?
Click to expand...
What argument of his? YOU'RE the one who is affirmatively claiming that Earth's temperature can, and has been, accurately measured, thus YOU are the one who needs to explain to us "idiots" precisely how that has been done.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Go ahead. Prove you are just as stupid as he is when it comes to math and science.
Click to expand...
Here, you are projecting your own issues onto him (and now me).
Poor Richard Saunders said:
How do you calculate an average?
Click to expand...
Depends. You need to be more specific.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You really going to adopt Into the Night's idiot argument?

Go ahead. Prove you are just as stupid as he is when it comes to math and science.
How do you calculate an average?
Click to expand...
They're a pair of socks. Have been for years. Nightsoil is the original, fgm7.15 is his back-up.
They specialize in denial. It doesn't matter what.
 
Into the Night said:
You haven't been celebrating New Year's Eve for a billion years, moonbat.
Click to expand...
You mean approximately 4.5 billion years, the age of our planet as scientifically measured.
No, I haven't. That's very astute of you.


Haw, haw..............................................haw.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You really going to adopt Into the Night's idiot argument?
Click to expand...
That is not measuring the temperature of the Earth. Try again. How would you measure the temperature of the Earth?
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Go ahead. Prove you are just as stupid as he is when it comes to math and science.
How do you calculate an average?
Click to expand...
Math errors: No published unbiased raw data. Failure to select by randN. Failure to normalize by paired randR. Failure to declare and justify variance. Failure to calculate margin of error. Attempt to use random numbers to speculate.

You are not discussing science or mathematics.
 
moon said:
You mean approximately 4.5 billion years, the age of our planet as scientifically measured.
No, I haven't. That's very astute of you.


Haw, haw..............................................haw.
Click to expand...
Science does not measure anything. Science has no theories about past unobserved events.

The age of Earth is unknown. Science is not speculation.
 
gfm7175 said:
What argument of his? YOU'RE the one who is affirmatively claiming that Earth's temperature can, and has been, accurately measured, thus YOU are the one who needs to explain to us "idiots" precisely how that has been done.
Click to expand...
Where did I make that claim that the temperature of the earth has been accurately measured? We can find an average of the temperature using multiple measurements. We can estimate the temperature based on Stefan Bolzmann and the energy entering the earth and leaving the earth. There is no one earth's temperature. That is your strawman that you want to beat up on. We don't even have to know the temperature of the earth to know if it is warming or cooling. If the averages are warming then the earth is warming. But we don't even have to rely on thermometers to tell the northern hemisphere is warming. We can just look at 600 years of ice out records on northern lakes to see that either warming is occurring or the temperature at which ice formed on lakes melts is changing.
gfm7175 said:
Here, you are projecting your own issues onto him (and now me).

Depends. You need to be more specific.
Click to expand...
I don't have an issue with science. That is your problem. You seem to think that if you make declarative nonsense statements than it negates science. You and Into the Night are nothing but idiots screaming into the wind.

If you have temperature readings from 10,000 different places, how do you find their average?
If you take those readings twice a day for 150 years, how do you find out if there is a change in the average over time?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top