U.S. "Arctic Outbreak" this week signals the End of Global Warming
- Thread starter Bigdog
- Start date
Diogenes
Gravitic propulsion systems powered aircraft
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Here, you are ripping a page straight out of AProudLefty's playbook. "Ummmm, I never SAAAAAAID [those precise words] ... DERRR!!!!" Yet, the positions that you are taking fully rely upon the assumed truth of that premise. You even do it again in the very next assertion that you make.
^^ Here, the Marxist "We" rears its ugly head again. Poor Richard Saunders has to pretend that he is speaking for a large group of unnamed people instead of just speaking for himself.
Here, you are assuming that Earth's temperature has been accurately measured ("multiple measurements" making up a valid data set that "an average of the temperature" can be calculated from). So, this brings us back to my question: How was Earth's temperature accurately measured? Accurate measurements of Earth's temperature are required in order to form a valid data set of Earth's temperature, and the existence of that valid data set is required in order to calculate an average temperature value from it.
^^ Here, the Marxist "We" rears its ugly head again. Poor Richard Saunders has to pretend that he is speaking for a large group of unnamed people instead of just speaking for himself.
Here, you are assuming that you know what Earth's emissivity is. You don't know what Earth's emissivity is. You also don't know what light is being emitted from Earth vs from other bodies such as the moon and the stars.
Here, you aren't making any sense. Idk what you mean by "one earth's temperature". There IS a temperature for Earth at any given point in time, though.
^^ Here, the Marxist "We" rears its ugly head again. Poor Richard Saunders has to pretend that he is speaking for a large group of unnamed people instead of just speaking for himself.
Here, you have made a statement so stupid that it will probably win a 'thooper thmart perthun award' of some sort at the end of this month. How are you visibly seeing that Earth has warmed by a fraction of a fraction of a degree Celsius over the last decade (as is commonly claimed by the Global Warming faith)?
I also didn't know that you could somehow calculate an average without the existence of a valid data set. Please show me how you are calculating Earth's average temperature (for any time period of your choosing) without the existence of any valid data set for Earth's temperature.
I also just want to note how funny it is that you are making reference to something you call "the averages" as if it is some sort of holy entity.
^^ Here, the Marxist "We" rears its ugly head again. Poor Richard Saunders has to pretend that he is speaking for a large group of unnamed people instead of just speaking for himself.
Here, you are claiming that you can somehow visibly see the northern hemisphere's temperature increasing by a fraction of a fraction of a degree Celsius over the last decade (as is commonly claimed by the Global Warming faith).
^^ Here, the Marxist "We" rears its ugly head again. Poor Richard Saunders has to pretend that he is speaking for a large group of unnamed people instead of just speaking for himself.
Here, you are attempting to make a stupid point using poor grammar. The surface area of ice at a specific defined boundary being more or less at any given time doesn't mean that Earth's temperature (or a hemisphere's temperature) has increased or decreased. This gets into IBDaMann's brilliant synopsis of the Global Warming religion and how it is essentially just one great big giant "lie of omission". In this instance, you are honing in on some warming while omitting cooling.
Here, you are blaming other people for your own issues. You can't fix your own issues by blaming other people for them.
For a simplistic answer, assuming that by "average" you are referring to a calculated mean value (the most common type of average), and that you are utilizing a data set consisting of 10,000 total temperature readings (1 temperature reading per 1 thermometer location), all of them simultaneously taken by the same observer, then you would sum up the values of each temperature reading and then divide that sum by 10,000 (the total number of readings). That would yield a mean temperature value (the average) for all 10,000 specific thermometer locations at a specific moment in time.
You cannot, however, turn around and claim that the average reading of those 10,000 thermometer locations is somehow "Earth's temperature" at the specific moment in time. That gets into a whole host of other issues (including but not limited to: declaring a margin of error value at the outset, removing all known biases (such as location and time), using only raw data, declaring and justifying a variance value, and calculating a margin of error value).
Let's see if you understand the answer to your first question before moving onto this question.
Last edited:
moon
Satire for Sanity
2024 was the warmest year on record.
news.un.org
Dumbass Deniers will have made the greatest contribution . We should start arresting them during 2025
2024 to become the hottest year on record
The year 2024 is set to be the warmest on record, capping a decade of unprecedented heat fuelled by human activities, according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).
Dumbass Deniers will have made the greatest contribution . We should start arresting them during 2025
Into the Night
Verified User
You don't get to speak for everybody, moonbat. You only get to speak for you.
The age of the Earth is unknown.
Into the Night
Verified User
No.
moon
Satire for Sanity
I'm simply relaying the proven facts as furnished by experts.
The age of the earth is , approximately, 4.5 billion years. That's universally accepted. This is going to hurt- your opinion doesn't count.
Haw, haw....................................haw.
Earth's Earliest Climate
What was Earth like in its youth? Explosive, hot, and unstable? Or cool and in control? Sedimentary rocks from the Archean Eon hint at something in between.
www.nature.com
Into the Night
Verified User
Arresting people because they don't believe in your religion??2024 was the warmest year on record.
2024 to become the hottest year on record
The year 2024 is set to be the warmest on record, capping a decade of unprecedented heat fuelled by human activities, according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).
Dumbass Deniers will have made the greatest contribution . We should start arresting them during 2025
DON'T TRY TO START A WAR YOU CANNOT WIN, MOONBAT!
moon
Satire for Sanity
Nightsoil- stfu
Earth's Earliest Climate
What was Earth like in its youth? Explosive, hot, and unstable? Or cool and in control? Sedimentary rocks from the Archean Eon hint at something in between.
www.nature.com
Into the Night
Verified User
Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). Attempted proof by void.
Into the Night
Verified User
Nature magazine wasn't around when the Earth was formed, moonbat.
Into the Night
Verified User
Heck. Gotta justify the annual party somehow, right?
Into the Night
Verified User
'Expert' worship. The age of the Earth is unknown, moonbat. No 'expert' was around when the Earth was formed. No magazine was around when the Earth was formed.
Void reference fallacy.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Don't you think that you've made a fool of yourself enough already ?
These are recent ' Into the Nightsoil's' statements ;
"Sweden is not to the east of the UK "
" There is no such science as paleoclimatology "
" There is no such thing as an unwritten Constitution "
" There were WMD in Iraq "
"There is no "weaponization of the dollar"
"Covid does not kill ."
"It is not possible to have a variant of a variant. "(Subvariants do not exist )
"Israel doesn't want to eradicate Palestine "
"The Arctic isn't melting "
"I don't need to seek attention"
"The age of the earth is unknown "
Dumbass or troll ?
Both.
Haw, haw........................................haw.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Nightsoil- and sock- here's an explanation of how the age of the earth is calculated......................for your age group;
education.nationalgeographic.org
Of course, you have to accept the existence of atoms and the rate of degradation of radioactive materials.
Maybe your best best is not to.
Haw, haw..............................................haw.
How Did Scientists Calculate the Age of Earth?
The examination and analysis of rocks on Earth’s surface, and of extraterrestrial rocks, have enabled scientists to determine the approximate age of the planet.
Of course, you have to accept the existence of atoms and the rate of degradation of radioactive materials.
Maybe your best best is not to.
Haw, haw..............................................haw.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Do you agree that the Earth is AT LEAST 1,000 years old?
Into the Night
Verified User
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Mantra 1a. Lame, moonbat.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
"2024 was the warmest year on record"
"2024 was the warmest year on record"
"2024 was the warmest year on record"
"2024 was the warmest year on record"
Into the Night
Verified User
I have no socks, moonbat. I don't need them like Sybil apparently does.Nightsoil- and sock- here's an explanation of how the age of the earth is calculated......................for your age group;
How Did Scientists Calculate the Age of Earth?
The examination and analysis of rocks on Earth’s surface, and of extraterrestrial rocks, have enabled scientists to determine the approximate age of the planet.
Of course, you have to accept the existence of atoms and the rate of degradation of radioactive materials.
Maybe your best best is not to.
Haw, haw..............................................haw.
It is not possible to calculate the age of the Earth. Radioactive decay means nothing here. Non-sequitur fallacy.
Into the Night
Verified User
The age of the Earth is unknown. There is, however, recorded history for 1000 years.