Was it necessary for the police to shoot?

Was it necessary for the police to shoot?

  • Yes

    Votes: 4 40.0%

  • No

    Votes: 6 60.0%
  • Total voters
    10
come on anad answer me guys.

You claim to have enough information about this to accuse the police of misconduct so you MUST know the answer to that one
 
you guys claim to know exactly what happened so well you can condem the police right now.


how many bullets?
 
you don't know do you?


which proves you know so little about this case that you don't have any right accusing anyone of misconduct
 
She had a weapon that weights tons and kills people every fucking day you idiot.

she had already ran over a police officer.

trayvon did nothing but try to stand HIS ground



all facts you stupid Aox


why do facts make you groan?
 
Big money said:
How can you justify the shooting of an unarmed Black woman with a child?
Click to expand...

Lorca said:
LOL Talk about baiting.

And intellectually dishonest.
Click to expand...

Big money said:
How so?

Was she unarmed?

Was she Black?

Was she shot to death in front of her child?
Click to expand...

Ah, you edited my quote, it was "intellectually" dishonest.
(The editing part is dishonest, lol)

And it is intellectually dishonest because you used inflammatory jargon and yet you left out the circumstance OF the shooting. Implying that those are the only reason why they shot.

I notice you post alot of little open questions, intentionally vanilla.....trolling to see if someone posts something you can exploit. But rarely contributing anything of substance.

People tend to do that when they've had their asses handed to them in alot of discussions to play it safe and try and improve their chances of "being right" (on the Internet!).

This forum section looks like it's been splattered with your polls and bait. I notice many are ignored. I'm beginning to understand that.
 
evince said:
are you fucking serious?


cops are never trained where to shoot a car to try and disable it?



can you prove that stupidity?
Click to expand...
cops are trained to shoot to stop a threat. period. that means if its a car, they shoot the driver, not the damned car. maybe YOU can show us where a policy states to shoot to disable a car.
 
Miriam Carey was shot Thursday afternoon as she emerged from her car after a high-speed chase near some of Washington's most sensitive landmarks.



Had Carey been shot a few moments earlier, such as when police had surrounded her car and she drove into them or as she sped off, it would have been justified because she had just aimed her car -- a deadly weapon -- at the officers, said Mark O'Mara, a CNN legal analyst.



But witnesses say the shooting occurred after the car had stopped and Carey had gotten out...





http://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/04/justice/capitol-hill-shooting-protocol/
 
SmarterthanYou said:
did she know it was a police officer? she was depressed with mental issues, right? maybe all she saw was a man pointing a gun at her.
Click to expand...

I agree, it's sad thing. But cops have to deal with the mentally ill more and more these days, and more and more of these mentally ill seem to be getting violent. In some places they are implementing training on recognizing mentally ill reactions/situations and handling them but the cops are still supposed to protect themselves and the public. It's not always black and white. She may have panicked, who knows? But there was a legitimate, imminent threat to others from what I saw in the videos.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top