Into the Night
Verified User
Blatant lie.I am. And you never challenge me.
Blatant lie.I am. And you never challenge me.
shut up you stupid assholeBlatant lie.
DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEM ON ANYBODY ELSE!After you make a personal attack. Don't waste your time playing your troll game.
you are a moronDON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEM ON ANYBODY ELSE!
There isn't one.I recommend you start with the philosophy of irony.
Bulverism fallacy.Nothing you write makes sense.
You are a mentally ill troll. Back to ignore.Bulverism fallacy.
Again, not an example of philosophy, mathematics, logic, or science. Just an insult fallacy.troll
Omniscience fallacy. You can't make anyone shut up.shut up you stupid asshole
Cowardice won't save you.You are a mentally ill troll. Back to ignore.
You are not learning it. You cannot think for yourself. All you can do is cut and paste...The goal is not to teach students how to craft their lives, but to enable them to think through what that entails and then make their own choices.
Serious thinking is not a natural attribute even in thinking beings. It needs to be learned. We would catch people in their late teens and early twenties as they move out of the parental home, facing big decisions that will define the shape of their personal and social lives: about education, work, love, relationships, family, politics, culture, and religion.
![]()
Is a Public Philosophy Still Possible? - Liberties
Are we living in a “golden age” of public philosophy, as some claim? There sure is a lot of it, as magazines, blogs, podcasts, and Substack newsletters proliferate. Even the New York Times ran a philosophy column for over a decade in which philosophers shared their thoughts on issues “timely and...libertiesjournal.com
You deny logic. You are still locked in paradoxes. You still make the same fallacies.Citizens also need to learn the skills of reasoned debate.
That is why method is important: mastering techniques of argumentation — logical and semantic tools that allow us to clarify our views and give reasons for our claims. Our students must be taught the virtues of discussion — valuing the truth more than winning an argument and trying one’s best to understand the viewpoint of the opponent.
Random phrases is not philosophy.The duality of eternity is that life is simultaneous for all things living spontaneously evolving inception to conception their replacements or not as life is a constant adapt or become extinct situation for each ancestral generation gap's reproductions changing form shaped fertilized cell to dead corpse alive each rotation between the arrival a and departure of each individual lifetime.
The mean time of simultaneously alive is the equality of living isn't a fair, just balanced daily. Cycles within cycles combined and compounding results never same details again to that specific rotation of a planet living happens regardless universal location as cellular forms are shaped from the erosion of the periodic elements combined into that universal unique location. Same as each life form of the locations natural food chain of events as a whole.
Eternal life evolves on a day to day still alive basis each unique lifetime occupying space each today in the life tomorrow evolves same way as yesterday except new total sum daily for each lifetime present.
The human species chooses to believe that isn't possible and create realities of anything else was.
How, philosophy, psychology, psychiatry, reasonable doubt, laws that order social compliance or individuals will face insubordination, treason, blasphemy any generation gap, race, creed, color, national origin, gender biases, political leaning, spiritual conviction, character matters social conscience, economic status, rank in the artificial social order beyond 16 original great great grandparents, 8 great grandparents, 4 grandparents, 2 parenting, 5th generation of arriving great great grandchildren born each rotation of the planet one ata time living in series parallel environment.
Name an academic subject that does that, I have never seen one in any society, historically with the ones that do exist educated anything else is possible than life is limited to eternally separated daily in plain sight of adapting as displaced.
Moral of my post is history has defined the outcome of human behavior ignoring how evolving naturally happens.
Blatent lie.I am. And you never challenge me.
Evolving isn't a philosophy either. It is a direct outcome from being conceived to replace one's own [previous generation gaps lived prior to one's conception adding another generation gap forward of ever changing people alive daily as specifically added until dead.Random phrases is not philosophy.
DON'T TRY TO COUCH YOUR HATRED IN PHILOSOPHY, LOGIC, MATHEMATICS, OR SCIENCE!
Random phrases is not philosophy.Evolving isn't a philosophy either. It is a direct outcome from being conceived to replace one's own [previous generation gaps lived prior to one's conception adding another generation gap forward of ever changing people alive daily as specifically added until dead.
You familiar with thermodynamic principles regarding periodic elements combined as universal positions as a perpetual balancing universe here now? time works in series parallel outcomes existing spontaneously here simultaneously as geographically present this rotation of this planet.
I understand the natural algorithm timing for each 31st arrival in ancestral lineages great great grandchildren born one at a time this rotation and they existed 0-9 months before being born today.
that process has been working since inception of this species becoming the 8 billion inhabiting space today.
I don't, I explain how philosophy weaponizes power of suggesting life isn't self evident evolving when timed apart from rotation of conception to rotation dead.Random phrases is not philosophy.
DON'T TRY TO COUCH YOUR HATRED IN PHILOSOPHY, LOGIC, MATHEMATICS, OR SCIENCE!
why should philosophy be made mandatory?troll
I'mma vote we concentrate on stuff with real world value.The goal is not to teach students how to craft their lives, but to enable them to think through what that entails and then make their own choices.
Serious thinking is not a natural attribute even in thinking beings. It needs to be learned. We would catch people in their late teens and early twenties as they move out of the parental home, facing big decisions that will define the shape of their personal and social lives: about education, work, love, relationships, family, politics, culture, and religion.
![]()
Is a Public Philosophy Still Possible? - Liberties
Are we living in a “golden age” of public philosophy, as some claim? There sure is a lot of it, as magazines, blogs, podcasts, and Substack newsletters proliferate. Even the New York Times ran a philosophy column for over a decade in which philosophers shared their thoughts on issues “timely and...libertiesjournal.com