What makes unalienable rights “unalienable?”

Robo said:
Courts are conducted by fallible men sworn to administer justice based in the proposition that all men are created equal and are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. If a court violates that principle it's humans who were on a lunch break & a damned good argument for an appeal, don't you think?
Click to expand...

and how many people have been exonerated after a couple of decades????? how many innocent people still reside in prison, or worse, have actually been executed?
 
rjhenn said:
IOW, your higher power is completely imaginary and has no actual power.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Imaginary, or not the power rules in the "imagination" of only Men who believe & it works so well, better than any governance devoid of a just and caring "CREATOR." You can no more prove an "imaginary" Creator, than anybody else can prove an actual Creator. What is provable, simply by common sense though, is the fact that all of CREATION, had to be "CREATED."
 
rjhenn said:
Words. No God has ever enforced your "guarantee". That's always been up to us fallible humans.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Principled Men are the "CREATOR'S" enforcers! Unprincipled Men are progressive neo-communist, fascist & authoritarians.
 
rjhenn said:
Yet there are many countries where those rights do not exist. Where is the guarantor of those rights?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Damned sure NOT in their governments, huh? Apparently they have no just & good "CREATOR' nor the principles thereof!
 
SmarterthanYou said:
and how many people have been exonerated after a couple of decades????? how many innocent people still reside in prison, or worse, have actually been executed?
Click to expand...

Courts are conducted by fallible men sworn to administer justice based in the proposition that all men are created equal and are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. If a court violates that principle it's humans who were on a lunch break & a damned good argument for an appeal, don't you think?
 
Robo said:
Courts are conducted by fallible men sworn to administer justice based in the proposition that all men are created equal and are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. If a court violates that principle it's humans who were on a lunch break & a damned good argument for an appeal, don't you think?
Click to expand...

Laughable bullshit.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
and how many people have been exonerated after a couple of decades????? how many innocent people still reside in prison, or worse, have actually been executed?
Click to expand...

Courts are conducted by fallible men sworn to administer justice based in the proposition that all men are created equal and are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. If a court violates that principle it's humans who were on a lunch break & a damned good argument for an appeal, don't you think?
 
Robo said:
Courts are conducted by fallible men sworn to administer justice based in the proposition that all men are created equal and are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. If a court violates that principle it's humans who were on a lunch break & a damned good argument for an appeal, don't you think?
Click to expand...

Laughable liar. :lolup:
 
Robo said:
What makes unalienable rights “unalienable?”

“We hold these truths to be self evident, that all Men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, and among these rights are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

The second paragraph of our Declaration Of Independence says it all. It reminds us all that without a “creator” there is no such thing as unalienable rights. Thus, our entire concept of rights being incapable of being taken away is only secured by a belief in a creator of all Men, as all members of the human race without regard for sex. It was those words that ended slavery and incorporated “All Men” into the concept of unalienable rights without regard for race or creed, but the concept of a creator is in and of itself unalienable to have the unalienable power to guarantee unalienable rights to all Men. Otherwise, all Men would have to rely on human government for any guarantee of any rights, an exercise in futility to say the least.

Thus, to deny the “creator” is to deny any logical concept of unalienable rights. Think about that before you vote. Who among our politicians holds the concept of a creator as being a self evident truth? Who among our politicians holds the concept of all Men being created equal as an endowment of our creator? Who among our politicians holds America’s founding principles as “truths.” Who are the real traditional Americans? Who are America’s true patriots? If we know our history, we know the answers to all of those questions.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately no one know who (or what) that creator is/was.
 
Robo said:
Principled Men are the "CREATOR'S" enforcers! Unprincipled Men are progressive neo-communist, fascist & authoritarians.
Click to expand...
IOW you're admitting that your "CREATOR" is a figment of your imagination and isn't real.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Robo said:
Courts are conducted by fallible men sworn to administer justice based in the proposition that all men are created equal and are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. If a court violates that principle it's humans who were on a lunch break & a damned good argument for an appeal, don't you think?
Click to expand...
IOW there is no God.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top