What should be the consequences of attempting to overthrow our government

[Poor Richard Saunders]

you're tard-tastic.

Thanks for playing the Troll. It's one thing you seem to think you are good at.

One thing you don't seem to be good at is providing evidence to support your statement that BLM attacked police officers.

But here is more evidence of Trump supporters attacking police officers

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

'A riot is the language of the unheard,' Martin Luther King Jr. explained 53 years ago

Riots occur on the street in neighborhoods. This is clearly an attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters unhappy with the outcome of a free and fair election.

 

[Drummie123]

No evidence to present to us? And you call me brainwashed? I am not preventing you from posting actual evidence here where we can discuss it's validity. But it seems you can't provide us with even specious arguments other than accusing anyone that doesn't swallow your unsupported hogwash without question of being an ideologue.

The people responsible for judging the evidence refuse to consider it.

Why?

The Washington Examiner


George Soros contributes record $50M to back 2020 Democratic efforts
by Mica Soellner, Breaking News Reporter | | July 27, 2020 04:06 PM

Liberal billionaire George Soros is breaking his own record by pouring more than $50 million into Democratic campaigns and causes just months before the November election.

Soros, an advocate with deep pockets for liberal causes, doled out $48 million total through his political action committee, Democracy PAC, which was created last year. An additional $4 million was given directly to Democratic campaigns and committees.

His spending is already more than double than the amount he committed to in the 2016 election cycle, the Washington Free Beacon reported Monday.

Federal data shows that the organizations receiving money from Democracy PAC include groups seeking to keep Democratic control of the House, Planned Parenthood, and various Senate campaigns.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...es-record-50m-to-back-2020-democratic-efforts

 

[Drummie123]

Riots occur on the street in neighborhoods. This is clearly an attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters unhappy with the outcome of a free and fair election.

You will like the consequences of the DNC intransigence even less than you like the 1/6/21 DC protest.

 

[Drummie123]

Riots occur on the street in neighborhoods. This is clearly an attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters unhappy with the outcome of a free and fair election.

riot
n. A wild or turbulent disturbance created by a large number of people.
n. A violent disturbance of the public peace by three or more persons assembled for a common purpose.
n. An unrestrained outbreak, as of laughter or passions.

More at Wordnik from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.

Not insurrection. Not a coup d'etat.

The riot was in response to the Democrat coup d'etat.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The people responsible for judging the evidence refuse to consider it.

Why?


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...es-record-50m-to-back-2020-democratic-efforts

They refused to consider it? I am curious as to which court rulings you have actually read. It's funny that you accuse me of only relying on the media but then you only post information from the media.

Here - read this court ruling and tell me what evidence you think the court failed to consider. Also explain how Soros was involved in the court ruling since you seem to want to make a specious argument that he prevented courts from hearing evidence.
https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315395

 

[Drummie123]

Soros spent less money than the Koch brothers.


https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2019-08-23/david-kochs-legacy-dark-money-network

If you are truly upset by spending and not an ideologue that simply hates spending by liberals then you should be decrying the spending by the Koch brothers long before you attack Soros.

What was Soros buying?

I say he bought the favoritism and integrity of the people who would disallow the evidence of the steal after Soros orchestrated the steal.

You intend to rob the bank. Then you bribe the bank guard to say he didn't see you the rob the bank.

What did the Koch's buy?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The riot was in response to the Democrat coup d'etat.

Do you have any evidence to support your specious claim of the election being a "Democrat coup d'etat"? A picture of the violent seizure of power by Democrats would be a good start.


Coup d'etat.
1.
a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

It seems like an attempted coup could be confused with a riot if you ignore that the Trump supporters were attacking the US government to prevent it from using it's power to count electoral votes.

Do you have any pictures of Biden supporters attacking the government to seize power?

 

[Drummie123]

They refused to consider it? I am curious as to which court rulings you have actually read. It's funny that you accuse me of only relying on the media but then you only post information from the media.

Here - read this court ruling and tell me what evidence you think the court failed to consider. Also explain how Soros was involved in the court ruling since you seem to want to make a specious argument that he prevented courts from hearing evidence.
https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315395

Convicted Felon George Soros: Buying Off Corrupt Politicians To Destroy Elections For America’s Judicial System:

He’s spent $45 Million to influence our judiciary?

Yup, that’s right. Soros has plugged the cash into left-wing action groups which are attempting to “remake the judiciary and fundamentally change the way judges are selected in the United States.” It seems that 39 states have some form of ballot judicial elections- which hold these judges accountable to the people. Soros wants to see a “merit” selection process instead, one in which there is a special panel that makes a list of judicial candidates from which the governor would choose to appoint.

The power to elect judges would be transferred from the American people to this panel, a group of individuals who are not elected and who would be accountable to no one. Soros is working to rid all conservative leaning justices from consideration by getting individuals on these panels who represent left-of-center ideology such as members of trial lawyers associations and other legal elites.

Control the special panel and you control the judiciary.

The rationale of Soros’ plan is explained this way: The public is too stupid to make informed decisions about judges, therefore, using a “merit system” would ensure that judges who are appointed are qualified. Sandra Day O’Connor is a proponent of this “merit system”. She claims that voters are “too unsophisticated to evaluate judges”.

Face it folks, the Left thinks of us as “Useful Idiots”.

Hey, didn’t Lenin have useful idiots?

https://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/...stroy-elections-for-americas-judicial-system/

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

What was Soros buying?

I say he bought the favoritism and integrity of the people who would disallow the evidence of the steal after Soros orchestrated the steal.

You intend to rob the bank. Then you bribe the bank guard to say he didn't see you the rob the bank.

What did the Koch's buy?

Hmm.... So when the GOP wins and Koch spent money, they didn't buy anything. But if the Democrats win that that is proof that Soros orchestrated a steal? Your argument doesn't even make sense since it relies on made up bullshit on your part that you can't provide any evidence to support.

This is an attempt to steal an election result by not allowing it to be certified:

 

[Yakuda]

That makes them traitors to this country and if you are a law and order type of person, then you know and support that the consequences is the death penalty. It dam well doesn't support the idea that we let this group have a voice in this country.

What if the govt should be changed? Are we to assume that just because it's the govt they should be allowed to do anything they wish?

 

[Drummie123]

Do you have any evidence to support your specious claim of the election being a "Democrat coup d'etat"? A picture of the violent seizure of power by Democrats would be a good start.


Coup d'etat.
1.
a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

It seems like an attempted coup could be confused with a riot if you ignore that the Trump supporters were attacking the US government to prevent it from using it's power to count electoral votes.

Do you have any pictures of Biden supporters attacking the government to seize power?

You have to lie and cheat and deceive to win.

Your post demonstrates this.

The Left has stolen this country's government through deception and treachery.*



*treachery
the act or fact of violating the trust or confidence of another

 

[Drummie123]

Hmm.... So when the GOP wins and Koch spent money, they didn't buy anything. But if the Democrats win that that is proof that Soros orchestrated a steal? Your argument doesn't even make sense since it relies on made up bullshit on your part that you can't provide any evidence to support.

This is an attempt to steal an election result by not allowing it to be certified:

Convicted Felon George Soros: Buying Off Corrupt Politicians To Destroy Elections For America’s Judicial System:

https://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/...stroy-elections-for-americas-judicial-system/

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Thanks for playing the Troll. It's one thing you seem to think you are good at.

One thing you don't seem to be good at is providing evidence to support your statement that BLM attacked police officers.

But here is more evidence of Trump supporters attacking police officers

you already admitted it was all true, backpedalling babboon.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Convicted Felon George Soros: Buying Off Corrupt Politicians To Destroy Elections For America’s Judicial System:

https://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/...stroy-elections-for-americas-judicial-system/

I see you are "using the dishonest media to brainwash the populace into accepting the sham."

The sham being your unsupported claim that Soros is doing this when you have no evidence.

I notice you failed to read the court ruling and tell us what evidence the court didn't consider.
Let me post the link for you again.
https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/...f&seqNo=315395

It seems you can't think for yourself, Drummie, but instead rely solely on the media that was used to brainwash you.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

you already admitted it was all true, backpedalling babboon.

People were arrested but many of those with known affiliations were members of RW groups such as the boogaloo bois.

Where is your evidence that any of the 74 arrested in Portland were members of BLM.

Evidence of Trump supporters that were arrested_

 

[Drummie123]

I see you are "using the dishonest media to brainwash the populace into accepting the sham."

The sham being your unsupported claim that Soros is doing this when you have no evidence.

I notice you failed to read the court ruling and tell us what evidence the court didn't consider.
Let me post the link for you again.
https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/...f&seqNo=315395

It seems you can't think for yourself, Drummie, but instead rely solely on the media that was used to brainwash you.

Just because crooks are human beings does not mean that all human beings are crooks.

Just because the mainstream media is crooked does not mean that all the media is dishonest.

You lack discernment. Or, more likely, you are pandering to those who can't tell the difference between trustworthy media and dishonest media.

You remind me of the snake oil salesman in this animated film.

Make Mine Freedom (1948)

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

People were arrested but many of those with known affiliations were members of RW groups such as the boogaloo bois.

Where is your evidence that any of the 74 arrested in Portland were members of BLM.

Evidence of Trump supporters that were arrested_

you already admitted it was all true.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Just because crooks are human beings does not mean that all human beings are crooks.

Just because the mainstream media is crooked does not mean that all the media is dishonest.

You lack discernment. Or, more likely, you are pandering to those who can't tell the difference between trustworthy media and dishonest media.

You remind me of the snake oil salesman in this animated film.

Make Mine Freedom (1948)

I gave you the opportunity to ignore the media entirely and look directly at the court ruling. I don't lack discernment. I go to original sources whenever possible.
https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315395

That is a court ruling unfiltered or distorted by media. Can you discuss it or not? So far, it seems you can't discuss anything that you haven't been told by the media you consider trustworthy after being told by the same media that you can trust them but not the rest of the media.

The only way to tell if media is telling you the truth is to check their sources and see if they are reporting correctly. The court rulings clearly show that the courts considered the evidence presented to them. Even in the court rulings where they ruled that the petitioner had not standing they on more than one occasion even went so far as to rule that the evidence presented was specious and without support. But you seem to be completely unaware of what is in the actual court rulings because you have not read any of them.

Here is another court ruling where the court clearly examined the evidence.
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Order-2.pdf
Let's discuss the fact that even though the complainant claimed there was signature fraud, their expert could not testify to any fraud in the signatures they examined.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

you already admitted it was all true.

Was that before or after you admitted you are simply an internet troll?