What Would Happen if the Feds Attempted Forcible Confiscation of Firearms? Speculate.

evince said:
yes the gun nutters would go full Timmy McVeigh on Americans for LEGALLY BANNING ONE TYPE OF GUN


they are dangerous people who are itching for a reason to kill people with their metal penis replacements


Its why so many are being murdered with these weapons
Click to expand...

It's control freaks like you who are itching for a reason to kill people. Banning one type of gun would clearly be unconstitutional, besides being just another control freak wet dream. Such a ban would have no positive impact.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Bleeding heart said:
And just who are these "gun nutters" I own guns and most people I know and worked with were gun owners and not one I repeat not one was itching to go out and kill someone.

I believe to only nutter here is you.
Click to expand...
He can't wait to have the government kill people for him.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Gonzomin said:
Wrong.Lefty's are smart enough to know our gun laws are harmful to society and result in many deaths and woundings every year. But we also know what big babies you rightys are about guns and we know it is impossible to confiscate them. You guys talk confiscation to stir up gun lovers with a false and ridiculous concept.s You are so primal in your love of weapons, that is works well. Sleep well cuddling up to your AR. Nobody is coming for it.
Click to expand...
Yes, our gun laws, all 20,000 plus, are harmful to society. Like all gun laws, they haven't made anything better and have only contributed to making things worse. If you want to make things better, try a positive step such as putting gun safety education in all public schools. But the control freaks oppose that because it would actually work and isn't in line with their paranoia about guns.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Althea said:
It will happen in the states that are concerned about the safety of their children.

There will be a handful of states that won't comply, and it will be their own problem.
Click to expand...
It has nothing to do with "the safety of their children". That's just the front control freaks throw up to hide their true motivation, which is simply acute paranoia about guns.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Althea said:
Why aren't you paying attention? Mass killers wouldn't pay attention to what? Anyone seen in public with one of these weapons, will have it taken away. The idea is to make it illegal to walk around in public with a banned weapon. When it isn't commonplace, mass killers will be easy to spot. They'll also be susceptible to traffic stops.
Click to expand...

Which mass killers were walking around in public with a firearm openly displayed? The El Paso shooter was in a gun free zone, as is often the case. This idea appears to be just more control freak wishful thinking.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Althea said:
Ummmm...no. It's Wiki, so you are free to correct it.






Perhaps we'll see quite a few instances of those you speak of being shot and killed as they attempt to take on the govt.

Eventually, we'll have fewer mass shootings. Natural selection, as it were.
Click to expand...
What does any of that have to do with mass shootings?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Althea said:
You aren't missing much. We have one who makes idiotic clams re. a well reported incident where quite a few anti America separatists ended up in jail...or even dead.

And you have a special needs fool who can't seem to follow the discussion.

Pretty much what you would expect in a thread like this.
Click to expand...

You're the one who seems to be having trouble following the discussion.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Evmetro said:
Dodge, deflect, divert, convert, invert, ignore, redefine, or otherwise evade that opening post. He was spot on about domer being incapable of responding to a hypothetical situation, but you have the same limitations.
Click to expand...
Those are all your standard tactics.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
rjhenn said:
It appears that you are the one who needs to sober up. You don't seem to be aware of what you've posted.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I've very aware of what I posted, but feel free to quote me along with your drunken response(s)
 
rjhenn said:
What does any of that have to do with mass shootings?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
If you cannot follow the thread, then just stop adding to the discussion. Lucky for you, you're too damned stupid to realize that you're making an ass of yourself
 
rjhenn said:
What you continue to demonstrate is that the control freaks are completely delusional.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Look, kid - why do you think the whole of the world regards you as screaming nutters? Race prejudice or something, is it, or could it be you re just screaming nutters, fed thick shit by the NRA? :)
 
rjhenn said:
It has nothing to do with "the safety of their children". That's just the front control freaks throw up to hide their true motivation, which is simply acute paranoia about guns.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Acute paranoia? WTF. We have lived in a society of gun proliferation and many, many gun deaths. We have gotten used to gun lovers shooting each other and have lived through many mass shootings. It barely registers in the news anymore. We do feel sad that gun lovers are at peace with a more dangerous society as long they have a weapon to fondle. We are inured to gun lovers fighting to make America a more dangerous country. None of this is new. We are at the "here we go again" stage of acceptance.
 
archives said:
giphy.gif
Click to expand...

Usual "arsecheese" blather. :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top