The usual ignorant BS that's all we ever see from the control freaks.
You moron; the control freaks are the Fascists on the left who think by taking away guns from law abiding citizens, it will make them safer. Nothing could be dumber.
![Roll eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png)
The usual ignorant BS that's all we ever see from the control freaks.
First off it would never happen. There aren't enough anti-gun zealots in government. Then they would need the military another violation of the constitution that people in charge would ignore not counting that the troops are not going to turn their guns on the people. That might happen in some action movie but not in the real world.
They thought that way in Italy and Germany too.![]()
Which mass killers were walking around in public with a firearm openly displayed? The El Paso shooter was in a gun free zone, as is often the case. This idea appears to be just more control freak wishful thinking.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Just curious what people think about how that would play out in the real world if it was tried.
My guess is that several states, counties and cities would immediately pass laws forbidding law enforcement from complying with the laws. I'm certain that many Sheriffs, chiefs and individual officers would refuse to comply as well.
I want to be absolutely clear that I don't advocate for violence, but I believe many otherwise law abiding citizens would target and kill police. Police would leave the job, en masse, resulting in exponential increases in violent and property crime, and general chaos would ensue. I believe that any attempt to confiscate firearms from law abiding Americans would result in far more deaths than all the mass shootings combined.
I'd like to hear what people think about the subject. Am I correct? Or would the millions of gun owners in the country passively comply? Liberals, feel free to make your dumb Barney Fife comments.
***Minimal thread bans. Banning Character Assassin because he is the most useless shit poster on the forum. I wasn't going to ban domer from this one, but I realized that he is far too stupid to speculate about what might happen in a hypothetical situation (we've all seen his moronic if/would posts).***
Just curious what people think about how that would play out in the real world if it was tried.
My guess is that several states, counties and cities would immediately pass laws forbidding law enforcement from complying with the laws. I'm certain that many Sheriffs, chiefs and individual officers would refuse to comply as well.
I want to be absolutely clear that I don't advocate for violence, but I believe many otherwise law abiding citizens would target and kill police. Police would leave the job, en masse, resulting in exponential increases in violent and property crime, and general chaos would ensue. I believe that any attempt to confiscate firearms from law abiding Americans would result in far more deaths than all the mass shootings combined.
I'd like to hear what people think about the subject. Am I correct? Or would the millions of gun owners in the country passively comply? Liberals, feel free to make your dumb Barney Fife comments.
***Minimal thread bans. Banning Character Assassin because he is the most useless shit poster on the forum. I wasn't going to ban domer from this one, but I realized that he is far too stupid to speculate about what might happen in a hypothetical situation (we've all seen his moronic if/would posts).***
What if the government sent Cub Scouts and Brownies to go to gun lovers homes and ask them to turn in their ARs?
By "manhood symbols", I will assume that you are referring to "arms" (ie, guns).Nobody on the left has suggested confiscating your manhood symbols.
No, it is a legitimate threat. See above.Rightys just cry about it to keep each other angry and scared.
No, it is a legitimate threat. See above.It is Stinksalot stirring up a fantasy to cry about.
They ARE coming for our AR's... They ARE coming for our rifles... They ARE coming for our guns. Many people will not willingly hand them over. That will likely result in some sort of war.What if they try to confiscate our wepons what would we do? OMG what a terrible scenario. They are coming for our Ars, then our rifles, then our guns . What can we do? It is war.
Nobody on the left has suggested confiscating your manhood symbols. Rightys just cry about it to keep each other angry and scared. It is Stinksalot stirring up a fantasy to cry about. What if they try to confiscate our wepons what would we do? OMG what a terrible scenario. They are coming for our Ars, then our rifles, then our guns . What can we do? It is war.
surprise surprise surprise this isn't Germany or Italy.
You should let imbeciles like AOC know that. She claims we have concentration camps near our Southern border.
You're the one who brought up mass shootings in a thread that has nothing to do with them.I've very aware of what I posted, but feel free to quote me along with your drunken response(s)
IOW, you just threw in a stupid remark about mass shootings because....If you cannot follow the thread, then just stop adding to the discussion. Lucky for you, you're too damned stupid to realize that you're making an ass of yourself
Too stupid to follow a link.LMAO. Where would that be?
Because much of the rest of the world is just as ignorant, delusional and paranoid about guns as you are.Look, kid - why do you think the whole of the world regards you as screaming nutters? Race prejudice or something, is it, or could it be you re just screaming nutters, fed thick shit by the NRA?![]()
Not really, your typical everyday bolt action hunting rifle is better suited.Why is it that politicians are only concerned with tactical rifles when they are the least common firearm used in murders ?
They are the best choice for political assasination.