What Would Happen if the Feds Attempted Forcible Confiscation of Firearms? Speculate.

Althea said:
Ummmm...no. It's Wiki, so you are free to correct it.






Perhaps we'll see quite a few instances of those you speak of being shot and killed as they attempt to take on the govt.

Eventually, we'll have fewer mass shootings. Natural selection, as it were.
Click to expand...

As I stated, some got time served, but the central figures, won. Their charges were dismissed.

That you wish to continue presenting what I said while pretending it doesn't say that doesn't change the reality. After Cliven's charges were dismissed the Feds moved to dismiss the rest of the charges as well, however one guy who had already been convicted did get 14 years, the rest that were already convicted but not yet sentenced all got time served or parole.

Ryan Bundy, who was with his father, is suing. Though that lawsuit is not yet complete.

What we "will have" is only people who know they have no possibility of winning saying dumb things like they'll send cops to take away guns... (Kamala) or that they'll magically get rid of guns in some magical way by "buying back"...
 
Disclaimer: I have not read all the responses to the OP. I have the OP author on ignore.

My guess is that the vast majority of our faux-patriots/wannabe-Rambos will meekly turn them over rather than face either being shot, or arrested, then loss of job/income while incarcerated, which of course would be followed by poverty and loss of family.

Of course this will never happen, but a fun speculation anyways.
 
Damocles said:
As I stated, some got time served, but the central figures, won. Their charges were dismissed.

That you wish to continue presenting what I said while pretending it doesn't say that doesn't change the reality. After Cliven's charges were dismissed the Feds moved to dismiss the rest of the charges as well, however one guy who had already been convicted did get 14 years, the rest that were already convicted but not yet sentenced all got time served or parole.

Ryan Bundy, who was with his father, is suing. Though that lawsuit is not yet complete.

What we "will have" is only people who know they have no possibility of winning saying dumb things like they'll send cops to take away guns... (Kamala) or that they'll magically get rid of guns in some magical way by "buying back"...
Click to expand...
So Wiki was THAT wrong?
 
Althea said:
So Wiki was THAT wrong?
Click to expand...

No, Wiki also told you that charges were dismissed for Cliven Bundy and his kids, etc. Pretty much everything I said... You just ignored it, like all good liberals and facts that don't work with what they want to believe.
 
Althea said:
Why aren't you paying attention? Mass killers wouldn't pay attention to what? Anyone seen in public with one of these weapons, will have it taken away. The idea is to make it illegal to walk around in public with a banned weapon. When it isn't commonplace, mass killers will be easy to spot. They'll also be susceptible to traffic stops.
Click to expand...

So they would do what they do now, hide it until they're ready to start shooting.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Althea said:
Ummmm...no. It's Wiki, so you are free to correct it.






Perhaps we'll see quite a few instances of those you speak of being shot and killed as they attempt to take on the govt.

Eventually, we'll have fewer mass shootings. Natural selection, as it were.
Click to expand...
Which of those mentioned committed mass shootings?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Damocles said:
No, Wiki also told you that charges were dismissed for Cliven Bundy and his kids, etc. Pretty much everything I said... You just ignored it, like all good liberals and facts that don't work with what they want to believe.
Click to expand...
LMAO. Ignored? One dead, one Bundy wounded, and a shitload of zealots in jail. Yea...exactly what you said.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Disclaimer: I have not read all the responses to the OP. I have the OP author on ignore.

My guess is that the vast majority of our faux-patriots/wannabe-Rambos will meekly turn them over rather than face either being shot, or arrested, then loss of job/income while incarcerated, which of course would be followed by poverty and loss of family.

Of course this will never happen, but a fun speculation anyways.
Click to expand...
You aren't missing much. We have one who makes idiotic clams re. a well reported incident where quite a few anti America separatists ended up in jail...or even dead.

And you have a special needs fool who can't seem to follow the discussion.

Pretty much what you would expect in a thread like this.
 
Gonzomin said:
Stupid premise. Nobody can or will confiscate guns. It is a thread designed to infuriate gun lovers.
Click to expand...

Dodge, deflect, divert, convert, invert, ignore, redefine, or otherwise evade that opening post. He was spot on about domer being incapable of responding to a hypothetical situation, but you have the same limitations.
 
Sirthinksalot said:
Just curious what people think about how that would play out in the real world if it was tried.

My guess is that several states, counties and cities would immediately pass laws forbidding law enforcement from complying with the laws. I'm certain that many Sheriffs, chiefs and individual officers would refuse to comply as well.

I want to be absolutely clear that I don't advocate for violence, but I believe many otherwise law abiding citizens would target and kill police. Police would leave the job, en masse, resulting in exponential increases in violent and property crime, and general chaos would ensue. I believe that any attempt to confiscate firearms from law abiding Americans would result in far more deaths than all the mass shootings combined.

I'd like to hear what people think about the subject. Am I correct? Or would the millions of gun owners in the country passively comply? Liberals, feel free to make your dumb Barney Fife comments.

***Minimal thread bans. Banning Character Assassin because he is the most useless shit poster on the forum. I wasn't going to ban domer from this one, but I realized that he is far too stupid to speculate about what might happen in a hypothetical situation (we've all seen his moronic if/would posts).***
Click to expand...

I suspect that this would drastically increase the firearms black market that already exists because of infringement of 2nd amendment rights. Even MORE ghost guns, even less information on who owns guns.
 
evince said:
stone by stone is not a liberal


no liberal would say America should be all white

stone by stone is a fake
Click to expand...

Stonebystone is a lefty, which is synonymous with socialist, communist, progressive, democrat, rhino, libertarian, and commie.
 
Gonzomin said:
Wrong.Lefty's are smart enough to know our gun laws are harmful to society and result in many deaths and woundings every year. But we also know what big babies you rightys are about guns and we know it is impossible to confiscate them. You guys talk confiscation to stir up gun lovers with a false and ridiculous concept.s You are so primal in your love of weapons, that is works well. Sleep well cuddling up to your AR. Nobody is coming for it.
Click to expand...

Thiso is not how one responds to a hypothetical situation. You are unable to process and respond to hypothetical situations, so you should have been banned from this thread like domer was.
 
Gonzomin said:
He said buyback. You are wrong and an alarmist. I would prefer buyback followed by confiscation.
Click to expand...

Buyback? The government never sold any guns, so obviously they cannot buy back what they never sold in the first place. This would mean that the original sellers buy their guns back. This would be a big mess.
 
Penderyn said:
Since when are murderous gunmen 'the People'? What you mean is the NRA has scared the media and the politicians shitless.
Click to expand...
What you continue to demonstrate is that the control freaks are completely delusional.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top