What would the ideal leftist America look like?

We have an amendment process for changing the Constitution, replete with checks and balances; an important facet of the work of our founding fathers. Of course these are ideals unknown to an illiterate clown like you.

Is the Constitutional Amendment process the same as it is for regular legislation, yes or no?

What does the Constitution say when it comes to passing legislation that isn't a Constitutional Amendment or Impeachment?
 
We've already established that you're dumb as dogshit - but far less pleasant to be around.

You're the idiot who tried to sound smart by using supposition when you meant assumption.

What was most hilarious about it was that you fucked up a post where you tried to convince everyone of your high education level.

But instead, you just put your foot in your mouth and gave me all the ammunition I need to discredit everything you say.
 
When we look at the Oligarchs who rule this nation - Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Nazi fuck George Soros, Warren Buffet, Jack Dorsey, Sergie Brin, Tim Cook, et al. - something stands out; they are all radical left socialists.

How is a billionaire also a socialist?

That makes no sense.

Billionaires are capitalists, not socialists.

If they were socialists, they wouldn't be billionaires.
 
If you had the capacity for thought - it might dawn on you that the Oligarchs pushing socialism and the democrat war to end the Constitutional Republic isn't to "punish the rich."

You run your big, fat stupid mouth a lot, but you say nothing in the end.

It's all just a cover for your insecurity around your personal education level.

You're panicking and stalling.
 
You are what's known colloquially as "a stupid fuck."

You're the fucking numbnuts that doesn't know the difference between an assumption and a supposition, and in your attempt to paint yourself as somehow smarter than me, you ended up putting your tiny foot in your big mouth because you're a fucking idiot, and you know it.
 
You were programmed by one of the hate sites to vomit out idiocy about "majority vote" in congress. Being that you are abysmally stupid - you STILL fail to grasp that the House remains a purely majority. Beyond this, despite my shoving your uneducated face into the fact that the Constitution explicitly calling for two-thirds majority for some actions by the Senate, you continue to ignorantly lie that the Senate was based on a majority vote "until 1837."

True or false, until 1837 every vote, except for Constitutional Amendments, taken in the House and Senate was done along majority lines.

It's a simple true or false.

All your screeching isn't going to change history.
 
And here were are again, DESPITE my posting Webster's, despite my graphing it out for your ignorant, lying ass.

LMAO!

Now you forgot what you said.

Long COVID brain.

You said that your "supposition of [my] education level was unquestionably accurate", then you tried to say it was your "hypothesis", but then you posted hypothesis as a synonym of assumption which isn't what you said.

You said "supposition" and you said that because you were trying to sound smarter than you actually are.

So in your dumb attempt to make me look dumb, you ended up making yourself look dumb and pathetic and desperate.
 
Your level of integrity is equal to your intellect - that is non-existent.

You have no integrity whatsoever and this conversation proves it.

You started off by saying "My supposition of your education level is unquestionably accurate"

Then when you realized you fucked up, shifted the goalposts to say that your "hypothesis" is what is unquestionably accurate, except that "supposition" and "hypothesis" are not synonyms.

Assumption is a synonym for hypothesis, which you helpfully pointed out.

But you didn't say "assumption", you said "supposition".

You are not a smart person...you're not even good at pretending to be smart.
 
Your questions are irrelevant because you're a lying cunt..

You're trying to sound smart again but you're just not a smart person.

You're a dumbass with a pretty bad case of Dunning-Kruger.

You can't seem to remember what you say from post to post, and then when you do you have to lie and redefine what you meant because you opened your big mouth and put your tiny foot in it.

All I had to do was just quote you.
 
So, there's a much greater range of diversity on what makes a good education, than there is on the course of an asteroid.

No there isn't.

You aren't entitled or credible enough to dictate how kids are educated because you've done nothing to earn that entitlement or credibility.

We don't come down to where you work and slap the dick out of your mouth...but maybe we should since apparently someone with no background is entitled to give their perspective into how you do your job.



only the opinion of educators matters and the rest of us should shut up and listen, as LV426 keeps trying to tell us.

So what is wrong with that?

You want to butt into a subject you have absolutely no knowledge of, and you are only self-evaluating your skills and credibility...no one has validated any of that.

So as it stands now, why the fuck should anyone listen to you when you haven't earned it?
 
True or false, until 1837 every vote, except for Constitutional Amendments, taken in the House and Senate was done along majority lines.

It's a simple true or false.

All your screeching isn't going to change history.

Oh, now you're trying to hedge...

True or false - you're dumb as all fuck?
 
LMAO!

Now you forgot what you said.

Long COVID brain.

You said that your "supposition of [my] education level was unquestionably accurate", then you tried to say it was your "hypothesis", but then you posted hypothesis as a synonym of assumption which isn't what you said.

You said "supposition" and you said that because you were trying to sound smarter than you actually are.

So in your dumb attempt to make me look dumb, you ended up making yourself look dumb and pathetic and desperate.


You dumb motherfucker.

You really think you can lie your way out of this, after being exposed as the moron you are?
 
Oh, now you're trying to hedge...

How am I trying to hedge when I've been saying the same thing for a dozen posts now?

You say that the Constitution "protects the minority" when it comes to Constitutional Amendments and Impeachments, but you don't say how...you just say those votes require 2/3 and you're pretending that it's applied to every vote when you know it's not.

So before, when you spoke of "integrity", you were really just projecting because you have none of your own, as evidenced by your shitty argument.
 
How am I trying to hedge when I've been saying the same thing for a dozen posts now?

You say that the Constitution "protects the minority" when it comes to Constitutional Amendments and Impeachments, but you don't say how...you just say those votes require 2/3 and you're pretending that it's applied to every vote when you know it's not.

So before, when you spoke of "integrity", you were really just projecting because you have none of your own, as evidenced by your shitty argument.


No, you lying sack of shit.

You suddenly toss in amendments (you forgot impeachment, you dumb fuck).

You're a lying cunt. You know it.
 
Back
Top