What's the Norwegian word for 'Teabagger'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
Interesting. I would say if he were say, blowing up an abortion clinic, and was doing it because Jebus told him to, that would be a "Christian Terrorist"... In this case he appears to be a random terrorist, not one doing it in the name of an all powerful blood-thirsty invisible friend.


So unless a killer announces that they hear voices -and according to Alias, wear overtly religious jewelry - it's incorrect to refer to them by their religious affiliation?


Awesome.



Is it allowed to describe a soldier as 'Chinese' if they were to, say, shoot a Tibetan if they didn't shout "I do this for China" when they pull the trigger?


Just askin'.
 
So unless a killer announces that they hear voices -and according to Alias, wear overtly religious jewelry - it's incorrect to refer to them by their religious affiliation?


Awesome.



Is it allowed to describe a soldier as 'Chinese' if they were to, say, shoot a Tibetan if they didn't shout "I do this for China" when they pull the trigger?


Just askin'.

Not really. Let's paint a picture.

Let's say I'm a Wiccan.

I join a group that dislikes people because they have blue hair we'll call it the "Blue-Hair Hating Bandits", then go and shoot up the Blue Man Group's concert and everybody in the audience who has blue hair or is near it.. because I hate their hair. Was I doing it because I am a Wiccan or did I do it because I'm a member of the Blue-Hair Hating Bandits, a "home-grown" terrorist organization?

Now, if I say joined a Wiccan group that espoused that saving the Earth was vital and to do it we needed to whack everybody not Wiccan, then shot up the same concert with the same result would I be doing it because of the "Blue-Hair Hating Bandits" or would I be a "Wiccan Terrorist"?
 
If you went nuts and started doing crazy shit like respecting life and showing love and tolerance to all I'd describe you as a Buddhist. Is that wrong?
 
When word first broke of the deadly bombing and mass shooting in Norway, there was little information available to suggest what party or parties were responsible.



Much of the right-wing commentariat filled that information vacuum with their own prejudices, declaring that this was clearly an act of Islamic terrorism. It was later reported that the suspect in custody, Anders Behring Breivik, is a native Norwegian with extreme right-wing politics and ties to fundamentalist Christianity.


Now that the uninformed and ideologically motivated guesswork has been proven wrong, these same conservatives are adopting the "No True Scotsman" fallacy and claiming that Breivik's abhorrent behavior was not that of a Christian, but more akin to that of a Muslim.



Muslim-bashing is one of the pillars of today's conservative movement, and they rarely pass up the chance to equate "Muslim" with "terrorist."



The reaction from conservatives to the tragedy in Norway -- from the initial round of shoddy guesswork to the subsequent dissembling on Breivik's ideological identity -- demonstrates the intensity of that anti-Muslim fervor.
















http://mediamatters.org/blog/201107240004
 
Poet's a brand new poster. Check his thread in the Announcements section. Poet's a proud liberal and all the rabid righties are in a froth over it.

Poet made a point of telling everyone he is a black gay male. How many posters write in their greeting....."I'm a straight white male"

That's not a greeting. That's an invitation for a date.
 
Poet made a point of telling everyone he is a black gay male. How many posters write in their greeting....."I'm a straight white male" That's not a greeting. That's an invitation for a date.



And I see it's gotten a response. Who'd have thought it?
 
Poet made a point of telling everyone he is a black gay male. How many posters write in their greeting....."I'm a straight white male"

That's not a greeting. That's an invitation for a date.

So the guy announces he's black, male and gay....and YOU interpret that as a date?

Relax toodles, this is an anonymous discussion board. If Poet's announcement turned you on, no one really cares. And if it didn't, no one really cares. People offer as much or little personal information on discussion boards as they want to let others know who they're dealing with. Ain't no thing.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Then you need to state up front what your opinion is, as it seems you keep trying to pass it off as fact. Also, you need to acknowledge that you were wrong about Breivik was an isolated persons, as his documented connection to local right wing extremist groups plainly states otherwise.

Brevik says he acted alone. I don't try to pass off anything. I make my statements and you can take them as you want to take them.

Brevik says a lot of things, but the evidence says something else. The chronology of the posts displays your dubious nature during this discussion, as just admitting you're wrong on any level seems beyond your Alias personality.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
I thought racial slurs were banned by the rules for this site, and those using them would be banned as well? Hmmm, seems Webbway's unprovoked racism is being given a pass....I wonder why?


You're not the only one to wonder that, but I'll give you the stock answers: freedom of speech, very relaxed moderation, one man's meat is another man's poison, we have him on IA and we only see what he writes when someone answers him, put him on "ignore" if he offends you, blah blah blah.

So, the usual BS. Seems the creators, supervisors and moderators of this site are playing favorites. Oh well, life goes on.
 
So the guy announces he's black, male and gay....and YOU interpret that as a date?

Relax toodles, this is an anonymous discussion board. If Poet's announcement turned you on, no one really cares. And if it didn't, no one really cares. People offer as much or little personal information on discussion boards as they want to let others know who they're dealing with. Ain't no thing.

Oh, for sure, Daphne. How many people who are new here make pronouncements of ....."Hi, I'm a straight white male"
 
Which hate-filled, fearmongering nutbag said it?



A. "We will not put up with any hint of Sharia law being any sort of law of the land".






B. "There is this attempt to gradually ease sharia law and the Muslim faith into our government".






C. "Time is of the essence. We have only a few decades to consolidate a sufficient level of resistance before our major cities are completely demographically overwhelmed by Muslims"










































A. Failin' Palin, the Grifter Grandma
B. Spermin' Herman Cain, Token Teabagger Tom
C. Conservative Christian crusader Anders 'Hitman' Breivik
 
Which hate-filled, fearmongering nutbag said it?



A. "We will not put up with any hint of Sharia law being any sort of law of the land".






B. "There is this attempt to gradually ease sharia law and the Muslim faith into our government".






C. "Time is of the essence. We have only a few decades to consolidate a sufficient level of resistance before our major cities are completely demographically overwhelmed by Muslims"










































A. Failin' Palin, the Grifter Grandma
B. Spermin' Herman Cain, Token Teabagger Tom
C. Conservative Christian crusader Anders 'Hitman' Breivik

So you're okay with Sharia Law in the USA?
 

You're confused. I am not the one who brought up Sharia Law. I'd be glad to discuss the shooter and the fact that you claim he acted in the name of Jesus in the same manner as muslim terrorists act in the name of Allah. Do you want to make your case to back up your claim?
 
Back
Top