Where is the proof?

Thing1 said:
What do you guys even mean "what smoke?" Do you read the news? 16 intel agencies. 16. And the FBI.

If there wasn't enough to investigate, they wouldn't investigate. I don't know what the big deal is. Let them investigate. How does it affect you?
Click to expand...

Put the hackery aside and stop and think for a minute.

Trump is in the midst of campaigning in either the primary or general. You don't like to give him credit for anything but Trump ran a very effective campaign in both elections. Why would he risk everything employing Russians[!?] to do something his own people could do better?

Would Flynn be STUPID[!!] enough to discuss sketchy business with Russians over the flipping phone or electronically? Flynn is an experienced spook himself: *assuming* he were up to something with the Russians, he knows how to cover his tracks and/or be able to fall back on plausible deniability.

Nothing about it adds up.
 
Darth Omar said:
Put the hackery aside and stop and think for a minute.

Trump is in the midst of campaigning in either the primary or general. You don't like to give him credit for anything but Trump ran a very effective campaign in both elections. Why would he risk everything employing Russians[!?] to do something his own people could do better?

Would Flynn be STUPID[!!] enough to discuss sketchy business with Russians over the flipping phone or electronically? Flynn is an experienced spook himself: *assuming* he were up to something with the Russians, he knows how to cover his tracks and/or be able to fall back on plausible deniability.

Nothing about it adds up.
Click to expand...

I don't know, and I think there IS a chance this could be nothing. But don't forget that he was losing most of the time - and some hearsay had it that even he thought he was going to lose right up until election day.

I don't think Trump has a moral compass, or any scruples. I think if he can rig anything to get ahead or gain advantage, he will.
 
Thing1 said:
I don't know, and I think there IS a chance this could be nothing. But don't forget that he was losing most of the time - and some hearsay had it that even he thought he was going to lose right up until election day.

I don't think Trump has a moral compass, or any scruples. I think if he can rig anything to get ahead or gain advantage, he will.
Click to expand...

No, he wasn't.
 
Thing1 said:
What do you guys even mean "what smoke?" Do you read the news? 16 intel agencies. 16. And the FBI.

If there wasn't enough to investigate, they wouldn't investigate. I don't know what the big deal is. Let them investigate. How does it affect you?
Click to expand...

Jeebus. These are the same cons who couldn't get enough Benghazi investigations and hearings, complaining about one Russia investigation that hasn't even been completed yet.
 
Guille said:
As soon as you answer my first question we can continue.

And why do you think he was losing? Did MSNBC tell you he was, lol?
Click to expand...

He was down in the polls for most of the election season. And yeah - the polls were close to right at the end. Hillary won nationally by about 2%.

Even if you add in MOE, he was still losing most of the time.

What are you going on? Your gut? The # of signs you saw?
 
Thing1 said:
I don't know, and I think there IS a chance this could be nothing. But don't forget that he was losing most of the time - and some hearsay had it that even he thought he was going to lose right up until election day.

I don't think Trump has a moral compass, or any scruples. I think if he can rig anything to get ahead or gain advantage, he will.
Click to expand...

Some say the same could be said about the previous administration.

Or even politicians, generally. People give Anatta grief, but I think he's mostly right: there's an unelected sub-government that doesn't have the people's interest in mind.
 
christiefan915 said:
Jeebus. These are the same cons who couldn't get enough Benghazi investigations and hearings, complaining about one Russia investigation that hasn't even been completed yet.
Click to expand...

Right? It's a basic investigation. And if it's a "witch hunt," the GOP Congress is leading it.

Say "Benghazi" to these guys and they still turn into rabid dogs. Or "email server."
 
Darth Omar said:
Some say the same could be said about the previous administration.

Or even politicians, generally. People give Anatta grief, but I think he's mostly right: there's an unelected sub-government that doesn't have the people's interest in mind.
Click to expand...

I think most people have come around to that viewpoint.
 
Darth Omar said:
Some say the same could be said about the previous administration.

Or even politicians, generally. People give Anatta grief, but I think he's mostly right: there's an unelected sub-government that doesn't have the people's interest in mind.
Click to expand...

Who says?

That's a Trump thing. "Some are saying...I'm not saying it, but some are..." I have never heard anyone who isn't a rabid partisan imply that the Obama admin was amoral.
 
Yaya said:
Good idea, so you and the two people who thank you agree with that sentiment about Trump and Russia, right?

I honesty think the whole Trump Russia thing is the new birther thing
Click to expand...

You know, I don't know how anyone can think you are a Trump supporter.

Nope, no support for Trump in the above post.

:rofl2:
 
Thing1 said:
Who says?

That's a Trump thing. "Some are saying...I'm not saying it, but some are..." I have never heard anyone who isn't a rabid partisan imply that the Obama admin was amoral.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that anyone implying the Obama administration was amoral is a rabid partisan? Pucker up to Obama's ass.
 
Yaya said:
Liberals immediately demanded this when Trump made his dumbass tweet that Obama wiretapped his Trump tower.

Yet, we still have no proof of any collusion between Trump and Russia to secure his election, YET, liberals pretend it is a fact.

Knock it off. Grow up.

I doubt there is any proof Obama had Trump towers wiretapped. I think Trump read brietbart and said, oh look there is proof.

Okay liberals, where is the proof of collusion? If you don't have any by now, then stand down.
Click to expand...

Oh. I thought you were looking for Trump's nonexistent proof.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top