Where is the proof?

Jarod said:
Because nobody official has actually made the allegation, only that there is a lot of liberal dreams that makes it look like Rump was colluding with Putin. Rump actually made the fake claim about Obama.

This is why there are investigations into Rump... no allegations yet.
Click to expand...

ftfy
 
Thing1 said:
Where did I say that I didn't think it happened?

It may have, it may not have. There is enough smoke there that there might be a fire. It's worth investigating.

Chill. We'll know soon enough. If they don't find anything, you can come on here & lie & say that we all guaranteed there would be something.
Click to expand...

So now you support a investigation into possible liberal voting fraud??
 
Thing1 said:
I don't know, and I think there IS a chance this could be nothing. But don't forget that he was losing most of the time - and some hearsay had it that even he thought he was going to lose right up until election day.

I don't think Trump has a moral compass, or any scruples. I think if he can rig anything to get ahead or gain advantage, he will.
Click to expand...

Are you accusing him of acting like Hillary and the DNC, during the Primary election??
 
christiefan915 said:
Jeebus. These are the same cons who couldn't get enough Benghazi investigations and hearings, complaining about one Russia investigation that hasn't even been completed yet.
Click to expand...

Regarding Benghazi - Where there's smoke, there's fire right??

Isn't that what you've been saying?
 
christiefan915 said:
Jeebus. These are the same cons who couldn't get enough Benghazi investigations and hearings, complaining about one Russia investigation that hasn't even been completed yet.
Click to expand...

And now we can accept their findings....

The collection of investigative reports reached harsh conclusions. Requests for extra security in Benghazi went unheeded in the weeks and months before the attacks, and there was poor communication within the State Department about those requests. National security officials did not respond to increased violence in the region by deploying more military assets nearby that could have responded sooner. After the attacks, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice was given inaccurate information about the incident that she shared widely with the American public.

In its report, the Accountability Review Board cited "systemic failures and leadership and management deficiencies" among senior officials at the State Department.Four agency employees were reassigned.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...owdy/74261098/

I hope you too accept their findings.....
 
three things

Of course the Obama administration had Trump wire tapped

of course there was no "collusion" between Trump and Russia during the election.

and thirdly, I couldn't care less about either

The democrats care about any slither of hope that they can pin something on Trump
but in the end it will be another conspiracy theory right along side the boogie man

And the only people pushing the wire tap allegation are the Democrats trying to use it as another Trump lied story.

If this wasn't reality Id swear I was watching children play games with their classmates
 
Milagro said:
Actually that pretty much what you said about the non-existent WMD?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I never did.

In fact, I never really faulted the intel, for the most part. My argument was always that Bush misused it - corroborated by your own British intel, who said that the intel was being fixed around the policy.

That was really the rub. Not that our intel community was fabricating things and way off. It's their job to keep gathering what they can - it's not always going to be accurate.
 
Jarod said:
Multiple lies covering up meetings with those who were involved.

Campaign manager accepting cash from those who conducted the break in at Campaign headquarters.

NSA lying about meetings with those who conducted the break in at the DNC and accepting payments from them...

There clearly is more or the FBI would not have an open criminal investigation into Donald Trump on the matter.
Click to expand...
Will there be an investigation into how the DNC hamstrung Bernie Sanders?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Yaya said:
Claiming that something is false about Trump, means I support him?

That is most dishonest thing you've probably ever said. How is saying something is not true about someone, mean you are a supporter?

I predict you will never explain it, because you know deep down it is bullshit.
Click to expand...

And as I predicted, the lying two faced Douchebag hasn't and will not ever explain it.
 
Queen Snowflake said:
It is called an ongoing investigation, things will be revealed when the investigation is done, we will then find out if there was collusion or no collusion. You just have to be patient. The Watergate investigation took awhile.
Click to expand...

Watergate STARTED with an arrest, you folks are still praying for one......
 
Thing1 said:
Exactly this.

This wasn't instigated by "liberals." 16 intelligence agencies started it.
Click to expand...

are you sure it wasn't liberals at 16 different intelligence agencies.......don't you find it odd that sixteen intelligence agencies investigated it for a year and none of them came up with anything beyond suspicion?.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top